All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	daniel@iogearbox.net, ast@kernel.org, andrii@kernel.org
Cc: bjorn.topel@intel.com, magnus.karlsson@intel.com,
	ciara.loftus@intel.com, john.fastabend@gmail.com,
	toke@redhat.com
Subject: [PATCH v5 bpf-next 16/17] selftests: xsk: Remove mutex and condition variable
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2021 00:43:15 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210329224316.17793-17-maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210329224316.17793-1-maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>

From: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@intel.com>

The usage of the condition variable is broken, and overkill. Replace it
with a pthread barrier.

Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@intel.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdpxceiver.c | 33 ++++--------------------
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdpxceiver.h |  3 +--
 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdpxceiver.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdpxceiver.c
index 95d9d35dbb93..084ba052fa89 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdpxceiver.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdpxceiver.c
@@ -126,18 +126,6 @@ static void __exit_with_error(int error, const char *file, const char *func, int
 			       test_type == TEST_TYPE_STATS ? "Stats" : "",\
 			       test_type == TEST_TYPE_BPF_RES ? "BPF RES" : ""))
 
-static void init_sync_resources(void)
-{
-	pthread_mutex_init(&sync_mutex, NULL);
-	pthread_cond_init(&signal_rx_condition, NULL);
-}
-
-static void destroy_sync_resources(void)
-{
-	pthread_mutex_destroy(&sync_mutex);
-	pthread_cond_destroy(&signal_rx_condition);
-}
-
 static void *memset32_htonl(void *dest, u32 val, u32 size)
 {
 	u32 *ptr = (u32 *)dest;
@@ -876,9 +864,7 @@ static void *worker_testapp_validate_rx(void *arg)
 	fds[0].fd = xsk_socket__fd(ifobject->xsk->xsk);
 	fds[0].events = POLLIN;
 
-	pthread_mutex_lock(&sync_mutex);
-	pthread_cond_signal(&signal_rx_condition);
-	pthread_mutex_unlock(&sync_mutex);
+	pthread_barrier_wait(&barr);
 
 	while (1) {
 		if (test_type != TEST_TYPE_STATS) {
@@ -903,24 +889,19 @@ static void *worker_testapp_validate_rx(void *arg)
 
 static void testapp_validate(void)
 {
-	struct timespec max_wait = { 0, 0 };
 	bool bidi = test_type == TEST_TYPE_BIDI;
 	bool bpf = test_type == TEST_TYPE_BPF_RES;
 
-	pthread_mutex_lock(&sync_mutex);
+	if (pthread_barrier_init(&barr, NULL, 2))
+		exit_with_error(errno);
 
 	/*Spawn RX thread */
 	pthread_create(&t0, NULL, ifdict_rx->func_ptr, ifdict_rx);
 
-	if (clock_gettime(CLOCK_REALTIME, &max_wait))
-		exit_with_error(errno);
-	max_wait.tv_sec += TMOUT_SEC;
-
-	if (pthread_cond_timedwait(&signal_rx_condition, &sync_mutex, &max_wait) == ETIMEDOUT)
+	pthread_barrier_wait(&barr);
+	if (pthread_barrier_destroy(&barr))
 		exit_with_error(errno);
 
-	pthread_mutex_unlock(&sync_mutex);
-
 	/*Spawn TX thread */
 	pthread_create(&t1, NULL, ifdict_tx->func_ptr, ifdict_tx);
 
@@ -1160,15 +1141,11 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
 
 	ksft_set_plan(TEST_MODE_MAX * TEST_TYPE_MAX);
 
-	init_sync_resources();
-
 	for (i = 0; i < TEST_MODE_MAX; i++) {
 		for (j = 0; j < TEST_TYPE_MAX; j++)
 			run_pkt_test(i, j);
 	}
 
-	destroy_sync_resources();
-
 cleanup:
 	for (int i = 0; i < MAX_INTERFACES; i++) {
 		if (ifdict[i]->ns_fd != -1)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdpxceiver.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdpxceiver.h
index 78863820fb81..ef219c0785eb 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdpxceiver.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdpxceiver.h
@@ -148,8 +148,7 @@ static struct ifobject *ifdict_rx;
 static struct ifobject *ifdict_tx;
 
 /*threads*/
-pthread_mutex_t sync_mutex;
-pthread_cond_t signal_rx_condition;
+pthread_barrier_t barr;
 pthread_t t0, t1;
 
 TAILQ_HEAD(head_s, pkt) head = TAILQ_HEAD_INITIALIZER(head);
-- 
2.20.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-03-29 22:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-29 22:42 [PATCH v5 bpf-next 00/17] AF_XDP selftests improvements & bpf_link Maciej Fijalkowski
2021-03-29 22:43 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 01/17] selftests: xsk: don't call worker_pkt_dump() for stats test Maciej Fijalkowski
2021-03-29 22:43 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 02/17] selftests: xsk: remove struct ifaceconfigobj Maciej Fijalkowski
2021-03-29 22:43 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 03/17] selftests: xsk: remove unused function Maciej Fijalkowski
2021-03-29 22:43 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 04/17] selftests: xsk: remove inline keyword from source file Maciej Fijalkowski
2021-03-29 22:43 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 05/17] selftests: xsk: simplify frame traversal in dumping thread Maciej Fijalkowski
2021-03-29 22:43 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 06/17] libbpf: xsk: use bpf_link Maciej Fijalkowski
2021-03-31 13:10   ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-03-29 22:43 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 07/17] samples: bpf: do not unload prog within xdpsock Maciej Fijalkowski
2021-03-29 22:43 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 08/17] selftests: xsk: remove thread for netns switch Maciej Fijalkowski
2021-03-29 22:43 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 09/17] selftests: xsk: split worker thread Maciej Fijalkowski
2021-03-29 22:43 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 10/17] selftests: xsk: remove Tx synchronization resources Maciej Fijalkowski
2021-03-29 22:43 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 11/17] selftests: xsk: refactor teardown/bidi test cases and testapp_validate Maciej Fijalkowski
2021-03-29 22:43 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 12/17] selftests: xsk: remove sync_mutex_tx and atomic var Maciej Fijalkowski
2021-03-29 22:43 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 13/17] veth: implement ethtool's get_channels() callback Maciej Fijalkowski
2021-03-29 22:43 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 14/17] selftests: xsk: implement bpf_link test Maciej Fijalkowski
2021-03-29 22:43 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 15/17] selftests: xsk: remove thread attribute Maciej Fijalkowski
2021-03-29 22:43 ` Maciej Fijalkowski [this message]
2021-03-29 22:43 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 17/17] selftests: xsk: Remove unused defines Maciej Fijalkowski
2021-03-30 16:34 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 00/17] AF_XDP selftests improvements & bpf_link Alexei Starovoitov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210329224316.17793-17-maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
    --to=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bjorn.topel@intel.com \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ciara.loftus@intel.com \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=magnus.karlsson@intel.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=toke@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.