All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
To: Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Fangrui Song <maskray@google.com>,
	Prasad Sodagudi <psodagud@quicinc.com>,
	Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] gcov: re-fix clang-11+ support
Date: Wed,  7 Apr 2021 11:54:55 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210407185456.41943-2-ndesaulniers@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210407185456.41943-1-ndesaulniers@google.com>

LLVM changed the expected function signature for
llvm_gcda_emit_function() in the clang-11 release.  Users of clang-11 or
newer may have noticed their kernels producing invalid coverage
information:

$ llvm-cov gcov -a -c -u -f -b <input>.gcda -- gcno=<input>.gcno
1 <func>: checksum mismatch, \
  (<lineno chksum A>, <cfg chksum B>) != (<lineno chksum A>, <cfg chksum C>)
2 Invalid .gcda File!
...

Fix up the function signatures so calling this function interprets its
parameters correctly and computes the correct cfg checksum. In
particular, in clang-11, the additional checksum is no longer optional.

Link: https://reviews.llvm.org/rG25544ce2df0daa4304c07e64b9c8b0f7df60c11d
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org #5.4+
Reported-by: Prasad Sodagudi <psodagud@quicinc.com>
Tested-by: Prasad Sodagudi <psodagud@quicinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
---
 kernel/gcov/clang.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/gcov/clang.c b/kernel/gcov/clang.c
index d41f5ecda9db..1747204541bf 100644
--- a/kernel/gcov/clang.c
+++ b/kernel/gcov/clang.c
@@ -69,7 +69,9 @@ struct gcov_fn_info {
 
 	u32 ident;
 	u32 checksum;
+#if CONFIG_CLANG_VERSION < 110000
 	u8 use_extra_checksum;
+#endif
 	u32 cfg_checksum;
 
 	u32 num_counters;
@@ -111,6 +113,7 @@ void llvm_gcda_start_file(const char *orig_filename, u32 version, u32 checksum)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(llvm_gcda_start_file);
 
+#if CONFIG_CLANG_VERSION < 110000
 void llvm_gcda_emit_function(u32 ident, u32 func_checksum,
 		u8 use_extra_checksum, u32 cfg_checksum)
 {
@@ -126,6 +129,21 @@ void llvm_gcda_emit_function(u32 ident, u32 func_checksum,
 	info->cfg_checksum = cfg_checksum;
 	list_add_tail(&info->head, &current_info->functions);
 }
+#else
+void llvm_gcda_emit_function(u32 ident, u32 func_checksum, u32 cfg_checksum)
+{
+	struct gcov_fn_info *info = kzalloc(sizeof(*info), GFP_KERNEL);
+
+	if (!info)
+		return;
+
+	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&info->head);
+	info->ident = ident;
+	info->checksum = func_checksum;
+	info->cfg_checksum = cfg_checksum;
+	list_add_tail(&info->head, &current_info->functions);
+}
+#endif
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(llvm_gcda_emit_function);
 
 void llvm_gcda_emit_arcs(u32 num_counters, u64 *counters)
@@ -256,11 +274,16 @@ int gcov_info_is_compatible(struct gcov_info *info1, struct gcov_info *info2)
 		!list_is_last(&fn_ptr2->head, &info2->functions)) {
 		if (fn_ptr1->checksum != fn_ptr2->checksum)
 			return false;
+#if CONFIG_CLANG_VERSION < 110000
 		if (fn_ptr1->use_extra_checksum != fn_ptr2->use_extra_checksum)
 			return false;
 		if (fn_ptr1->use_extra_checksum &&
 			fn_ptr1->cfg_checksum != fn_ptr2->cfg_checksum)
 			return false;
+#else
+		if (fn_ptr1->cfg_checksum != fn_ptr2->cfg_checksum)
+			return false;
+#endif
 		fn_ptr1 = list_next_entry(fn_ptr1, head);
 		fn_ptr2 = list_next_entry(fn_ptr2, head);
 	}
@@ -378,17 +401,22 @@ size_t convert_to_gcda(char *buffer, struct gcov_info *info)
 
 	list_for_each_entry(fi_ptr, &info->functions, head) {
 		u32 i;
-		u32 len = 2;
-
-		if (fi_ptr->use_extra_checksum)
-			len++;
 
 		pos += store_gcov_u32(buffer, pos, GCOV_TAG_FUNCTION);
-		pos += store_gcov_u32(buffer, pos, len);
+#if CONFIG_CLANG_VERSION < 110000
+		pos += store_gcov_u32(buffer, pos,
+			fi_ptr->use_extra_checksum ? 3 : 2);
+#else
+		pos += store_gcov_u32(buffer, pos, 3);
+#endif
 		pos += store_gcov_u32(buffer, pos, fi_ptr->ident);
 		pos += store_gcov_u32(buffer, pos, fi_ptr->checksum);
+#if CONFIG_CLANG_VERSION < 110000
 		if (fi_ptr->use_extra_checksum)
 			pos += store_gcov_u32(buffer, pos, fi_ptr->cfg_checksum);
+#else
+		pos += store_gcov_u32(buffer, pos, fi_ptr->cfg_checksum);
+#endif
 
 		pos += store_gcov_u32(buffer, pos, GCOV_TAG_COUNTER_BASE);
 		pos += store_gcov_u32(buffer, pos, fi_ptr->num_counters * 2);
-- 
2.31.1.295.g9ea45b61b8-goog


  reply	other threads:[~2021-04-07 18:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-07 18:54 [PATCH 0/2] gcov: re-fix clang-11 support Nick Desaulniers
2021-04-07 18:54 ` Nick Desaulniers [this message]
2021-04-07 19:51   ` [PATCH 1/2] gcov: re-fix clang-11+ support Nathan Chancellor
2021-04-07 21:21   ` Andrew Morton
2021-04-07 21:28     ` Nick Desaulniers
2021-04-07 22:26       ` Andrew Morton
2021-04-08 18:46         ` [PATCH v2] " Nick Desaulniers
2021-04-07 18:54 ` [PATCH 2/2] gcov: re-drop support for clang-10 Nick Desaulniers
2021-04-07 19:07   ` Fangrui Song
2021-04-07 19:51   ` Nathan Chancellor

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210407185456.41943-2-ndesaulniers@google.com \
    --to=ndesaulniers@google.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maskray@google.com \
    --cc=nathan@kernel.org \
    --cc=oberpar@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=psodagud@quicinc.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.