From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D59B7C433ED for ; Thu, 8 Apr 2021 22:13:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21E3861132 for ; Thu, 8 Apr 2021 22:13:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232675AbhDHWNz (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Apr 2021 18:13:55 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:41156 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232265AbhDHWNz (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Apr 2021 18:13:55 -0400 Received: from mail.enpas.org (zhong.enpas.org [IPv6:2a03:4000:2:537::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E346C061760; Thu, 8 Apr 2021 15:13:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.enpas.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 09DD7FF95A; Thu, 8 Apr 2021 22:13:38 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2021 00:13:35 +0200 From: Max Staudt To: Wolfram Sang Cc: Heikki Krogerus , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/12] i2c: icy: Constify the software node Message-ID: <20210409001335.2d3b9484.max@enpas.org> In-Reply-To: <20210408212251.GJ1900@kunai> References: <20210329105047.51033-1-heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> <20210329105047.51033-10-heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> <20210330155856.3cf32fce.max@enpas.org> <20210408212251.GJ1900@kunai> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 8 Apr 2021 23:22:51 +0200 Wolfram Sang wrote: > I read this as "Reviewed-by" ;) Sure, why not :) Reviewed-by: Max Staudt