From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tom Rini Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 14:38:00 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Revert "spl: Drop bd_info in the data section" In-Reply-To: References: <20210409205312.GL1310@bill-the-cat> <20210412132546.GS1310@bill-the-cat> <20210412144044.GT1310@bill-the-cat> <043c5ab0-8176-97f2-88fb-50c7ce914cf6@gmail.com> <20210412162640.GX1310@bill-the-cat> <20210412181818.GY1310@bill-the-cat> Message-ID: <20210412183800.GA1310@bill-the-cat> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 06:26:08AM +1200, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Tom, > > On Tue, 13 Apr 2021 at 06:18, Tom Rini wrote: > > > > On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 05:49:19AM +1200, Simon Glass wrote: [snip] > > > As to a weak function, what would the default behaviour be? If we can > > > define that, then it would be better IMO. > > > > > > When we try to refactor things, weak functions and undefined (or > > > arch-specific behaviour) can really make things tough. > > > > Well, what was the problem you were trying to solve here? I assumed > > there was a case where things actively broke, with the previous design, > > and it's not just the 64byte savings in some cases. But is it? > > Yes the region of memory is not writable, so must be allocated at runtime. Where, on x86? Some ARM cases? That's one of the other things to sort out here. -- Tom -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 659 bytes Desc: not available URL: