From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailout4.zoneedit.com (mailout4.zoneedit.com [64.68.198.64]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web08.1427.1618511077727301656 for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 11:24:38 -0700 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=missing; spf=none, err=permanent DNS error (domain: denix.org, ip: 64.68.198.64, mailfrom: denis@denix.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailout4.zoneedit.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9824E40C81; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 18:24:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailout4.zoneedit.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zmo14-pco.easydns.vpn [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sHNpiu40qU2d; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 18:24:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.denix.org (pool-100-15-86-127.washdc.fios.verizon.net [100.15.86.127]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailout4.zoneedit.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 52A52407E5; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 18:24:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.denix.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A61671745B4; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 14:24:31 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2021 14:24:31 -0400 From: "Denys Dmytriyenko" To: praneeth@ti.com Cc: Denys Dmytriyenko , Lokesh Vutla , Nikhil Devshatwar , meta-ti@lists.yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: [meta-ti] [dunfell/master PATCH 0/6] am65x/j7*: Remove non-existent 5.10.y dtb* Message-ID: <20210415182431.GU15937@denix.org> References: <20210415051105.1626-1-praneeth@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 12:07:05PM -0500, praneeth via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote: > Denys, > > On 4/15/2021 12:10 AM, praneeth@ti.com wrote: > >From: Praneeth Bajjuri > > > >The current ti-linux-5.10.y integration branch doesnt have support for > >non base board dtb/o form the primary latest processor board on am65 and > >j7* evms yet. > > > >Removing these dtb/o for enabling the builds to continue. > >Plan to add these blob and overlays back once the equivalent support is > >added in the integrated ti-linux-5.10.y kernel. > > > > Need your recommendation if this is the right approach to enable the > builds at this early stage of LTS migration (and re-enable the > overlays once the support is added in kernel). That's kind of normal to start a new LTS with bare minimum of dtb/o support. But I have 2 concerns: 1. Maybe better to just push commit with removal, instead of reverting old commits - it may get quite confusing soon with reverts of reverts... 2. Do you think it's still premature to make 5.10 as a default in meta-ti dunfell branch? Since dunfell is kind of established stable (not a new LTS), anyone who updates meta-ti will go from fully working 5.4 to a very minimal and bare 5.10 - may be a bad user experience... > >Praneeth Bajjuri (6): > > Revert "conf: j7-evm: Add jailhouse dtbo" > > Revert "j7-evm: add new k3-j721e-proc-board-tps65917.dtb" > > Revert "j7-evm: add new infotainment DTBO file" > > Revert "j7-evm: add k3-j721e-pcie-backplane.dtbo" > > Revert "conf: machine: j7200-evm: Add Jailhouse overlay" > > conf/machine: am65xx: Remove non-existent dtb* from 5.10 > > > > conf/machine/include/am65xx.inc | 11 ----------- > > conf/machine/j7-evm.conf | 4 ---- > > conf/machine/j7200-evm.conf | 1 - > > 3 files changed, 16 deletions(-) > > -- Regards, Denys Dmytriyenko PGP: 0x420902729A92C964 - https://denix.org/0x420902729A92C964 Fingerprint: 25FC E4A5 8A72 2F69 1186 6D76 4209 0272 9A92 C964