From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB321C433ED for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 13:55:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CEE26144B for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 13:55:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S243006AbhDUN42 (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Apr 2021 09:56:28 -0400 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:12825 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S242991AbhDUN4R (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Apr 2021 09:56:17 -0400 IronPort-SDR: /z5Uds6EhP9vAgs3m6iBsqqSG/IwSo0pz3bbuN7bpMSaZdy/edwh4CWm086F3Dg2ahfMnL6TF/ OtnFjntsGLAg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,9961"; a="195813564" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.82,240,1613462400"; d="scan'208";a="195813564" Received: from fmsmga004.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.48]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 21 Apr 2021 06:55:44 -0700 IronPort-SDR: a0O7fup/fNWapIQUoQDd4Us1kG2YhvXRSlca7TFcVhV5ftYCHn7OaIP3lFVgBiOzDREuQTNjey nVUytfM/VGGw== X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.82,240,1613462400"; d="scan'208";a="445941924" Received: from smtp.ostc.intel.com ([10.54.29.231]) by fmsmga004-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 21 Apr 2021 06:55:43 -0700 Received: from localhost (mtg-dev.jf.intel.com [10.54.74.10]) by smtp.ostc.intel.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECA1B6363; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 06:55:42 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 06:55:42 -0700 From: mark gross To: Jassi Brar Cc: mgross@linux.intel.com, Rob Herring , markgross@kernel.org, "arnd@arndb.de" , bp@suse.de, damien.lemoal@wdc.com, dragan.cvetic@xilinx.com, Greg KH , Jonathan Corbet , palmerdabbelt@google.com, paul.walmsley@sifive.com, Peng Fan , Shawn Guo , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Daniele Alessandrelli , Devicetree List Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 04/34] dt-bindings: Add bindings for Keem Bay IPC driver Message-ID: <20210421135542.GB108315@linux.intel.com> Reply-To: mgross@linux.intel.com References: <20210212222304.110194-1-mgross@linux.intel.com> <20210212222304.110194-5-mgross@linux.intel.com> <20210305210140.GA622142@robh.at.kernel.org> <20210308202008.GA138795@linux.intel.com> <20210420221459.GA108315@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210420221459.GA108315@linux.intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 03:14:59PM -0700, mark gross wrote: > On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 04:24:41PM -0500, Jassi Brar wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 2:20 PM mark gross wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 03:01:40PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > > > > On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 02:22:34PM -0800, mgross@linux.intel.com wrote: > > > > > From: Daniele Alessandrelli > > > > > > > > > > Add DT binding documentation for the Intel Keem Bay IPC driver, which > > > > > > > > Bindings are for h/w blocks, not drivers. From a binding perspective, I > > > > don't really care what the driver architecture for some OS looks like. I > > > > continue to not understand what this h/w looks like. A block diagram > > > > would help as would understanding what blocks have multiple clients > > > > (mailboxes and xlink in particular). > > > I'm working to gather this info. > > > > > Do I pick the mailbox related patches (and which ones exactly) ? > > v6-0002-dt-bindings-mailbox-Add-Intel-VPU-IPC-mailbox-bin.patch > and > v6-0003-mailbox-vpu-ipc-mailbox-Add-support-for-Intel-VPU.patch > Sorry for the confusion and delay. It seems there are some internal requests to change the name of this part of the VPU driver stack to avoid possible future namespace collisions. We will rename the vpu-ipc-mailbox with something more specific to KMB on the next posting. That looks like will have to be against v5.13-rc1 at this point. Sigh. Thanks, --mark