All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Cc: Anand Ashok Dumbre <anandash@xilinx.com>,
	Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>,
	linux-iio@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] iio: xilinx-xadc: Make IRQ optional
Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2021 16:25:59 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210425162559.11371323@jic23-huawei> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210425102638.9511-2-lars@metafoo.de>

On Sun, 25 Apr 2021 12:26:38 +0200
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de> wrote:

> In some setups the IRQ signal of the XADC might not be wired to the host
> system. The driver currently requires that an interrupt is specified. Make
> the interrupt optional so the driver can be used in such setups where the
> interrupt is not connected.
> 
> Since both buffered capture as well as events depend on the interrupt being
> connected both are not available when the interrupt is not connected.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>

Code looks fine to me but raises a question.  As there is no validate_trigger
callback in this driver, nothing stops it being associated with for example
an hrtimer trigger.  I don't think that will work so perhaps we should add the
callback?  If it does work, then the presence or not of an irq should not
change whether we register the buffer.

Jonathan

> ---
>  drivers/iio/adc/xilinx-xadc-core.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++-----------
>  1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/xilinx-xadc-core.c b/drivers/iio/adc/xilinx-xadc-core.c
> index dd1c92b2811f..ffefb01a3893 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/xilinx-xadc-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/xilinx-xadc-core.c
> @@ -1182,7 +1182,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id xadc_of_match_table[] = {
>  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, xadc_of_match_table);
>  
>  static int xadc_parse_dt(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, struct device_node *np,
> -	unsigned int *conf)
> +	unsigned int *conf, int irq)
>  {
>  	struct device *dev = indio_dev->dev.parent;
>  	struct xadc *xadc = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> @@ -1195,6 +1195,7 @@ static int xadc_parse_dt(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, struct device_node *np,
>  	u32 ext_mux_chan;
>  	u32 reg;
>  	int ret;
> +	int i;
>  
>  	*conf = 0;
>  
> @@ -1273,6 +1274,14 @@ static int xadc_parse_dt(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, struct device_node *np,
>  	}
>  	of_node_put(chan_node);
>  
> +	/* No IRQ => no events */
> +	if (irq <= 0) {
> +		for (i = 0; i < num_channels; i++) {
> +			channels[i].event_spec = NULL;
> +			channels[i].num_event_specs = 0;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
>  	indio_dev->num_channels = num_channels;
>  	indio_dev->channels = devm_krealloc(dev, channels,
>  					    sizeof(*channels) * num_channels,
> @@ -1322,9 +1331,9 @@ static int xadc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	if (!id)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
> -	irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> -	if (irq <= 0)
> -		return -ENXIO;
> +	irq = platform_get_irq_optional(pdev, 0);
> +	if (irq < 0 && irq != -ENXIO)
> +		return irq;
>  
>  	indio_dev = devm_iio_device_alloc(dev, sizeof(*xadc));
>  	if (!indio_dev)
> @@ -1345,11 +1354,11 @@ static int xadc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	indio_dev->modes = INDIO_DIRECT_MODE;
>  	indio_dev->info = &xadc_info;
>  
> -	ret = xadc_parse_dt(indio_dev, dev->of_node, &conf0);
> +	ret = xadc_parse_dt(indio_dev, dev->of_node, &conf0, irq);
>  	if (ret)
>  		return ret;
>  
> -	if (xadc->ops->flags & XADC_FLAGS_BUFFERED) {
> +	if (irq > 0 && (xadc->ops->flags & XADC_FLAGS_BUFFERED)) {
>  		ret = devm_iio_triggered_buffer_setup(dev, indio_dev,
>  						      &iio_pollfunc_store_time,
>  						      &xadc_trigger_handler,
> @@ -1396,15 +1405,17 @@ static int xadc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> -	ret = devm_request_irq(dev, irq, xadc->ops->interrupt_handler, 0,
> -			       dev_name(dev), indio_dev);
> -	if (ret)
> -		return ret;
> +	if (irq > 0) {
> +		ret = devm_request_irq(dev, irq, xadc->ops->interrupt_handler,
> +				       0, dev_name(dev), indio_dev);
> +		if (ret)
> +			return ret;
>  
> -	ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, xadc_cancel_delayed_work,
> -				       &xadc->zynq_unmask_work);
> -	if (ret)
> -		return ret;
> +		ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, xadc_cancel_delayed_work,
> +					       &xadc->zynq_unmask_work);
> +		if (ret)
> +			return ret;
> +	}
>  
>  	ret = xadc->ops->setup(pdev, indio_dev, irq);
>  	if (ret)


  reply	other threads:[~2021-04-25 15:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-25 10:26 [PATCH 1/2] iio: xilinx-xadc: Remove `irq` field from state struct Lars-Peter Clausen
2021-04-25 10:26 ` [PATCH 2/2] iio: xilinx-xadc: Make IRQ optional Lars-Peter Clausen
2021-04-25 15:25   ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2021-04-25 16:05     ` Lars-Peter Clausen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210425162559.11371323@jic23-huawei \
    --to=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=anandash@xilinx.com \
    --cc=lars@metafoo.de \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michal.simek@xilinx.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.