From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6C32C433B4 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 13:33:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AFAB61185 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 13:33:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233494AbhDZNdp (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Apr 2021 09:33:45 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:41303 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231862AbhDZNdp (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Apr 2021 09:33:45 -0400 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 8FF7B68C7B; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 15:33:00 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2021 15:33:00 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Christian Brauner Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Aleksa Sarai , Al Viro , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Richard Guy Briggs , Christian Brauner Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] fcntl: remove unused VALID_UPGRADE_FLAGS Message-ID: <20210426133300.GA14812@lst.de> References: <20210423111037.3590242-1-brauner@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210423111037.3590242-1-brauner@kernel.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 01:10:35PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote: > From: Christian Brauner > > We currently do not maky use of this feature and should we implement > something like this in the future it's trivial to add it back. Looks like that ->upgrade_mask field never made it into mainline? Either way removing and unused mask always seems valid, so: Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig