From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3897C433B4 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 13:47:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B889F61176 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 13:47:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233699AbhDZNrz (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Apr 2021 09:47:55 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:37282 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230250AbhDZNrx (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Apr 2021 09:47:53 -0400 Received: from fieldses.org (fieldses.org [IPv6:2600:3c00:e000:2f7::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60FCDC061574; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 06:47:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by fieldses.org (Postfix, from userid 2815) id 966213723; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 09:47:11 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 fieldses.org 966213723 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fieldses.org; s=default; t=1619444831; bh=o1uV8mMXke6YWci50VHqZhlaQRReuOaqTAAYtR+elE0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=qTPyU0qm8YYRWeSjDPQeY0Bdm37EJnecOt71xY/pT/e03dK0uipO2rk+Xu/IAsYhk CTtheiYvyfbzjjf7L6A+8KGZo5dbWd1GqkfBAkeN5GYAuyEJaIeQDsb1o359SmOPOY M+CIqqYl5mV/6uL/wKRw+HM5O2GYRXkXvxqhfQe4= Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2021 09:47:11 -0400 From: "J. Bruce Fields" To: Greg KH Cc: Theodore Ts'o , Al Viro , Leon Romanovsky , "Shelat, Abhi" , Sudip Mukherjee , Aditya Pakki , Chuck Lever , Trond Myklebust , Anna Schumaker , "David S. Miller" , Jakub Kicinski , Dave Wysochanski , "linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org" , netdev , linux-kernel Subject: Re: [PATCH] SUNRPC: Add a check for gss_release_msg Message-ID: <20210426134711.GE21222@fieldses.org> References: <20210422193950.GA25415@fieldses.org> <20210423180727.GD10457@fieldses.org> <20210423214850.GI10457@fieldses.org> <20210424213454.GA4239@fieldses.org> <20210426133605.GD21222@fieldses.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210426133605.GD21222@fieldses.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 09:36:05AM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > On Sun, Apr 25, 2021 at 08:29:53AM +0200, Greg KH wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 24, 2021 at 08:41:27PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > > > On Sat, Apr 24, 2021 at 05:34:54PM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > > > > In Greg's revert thread, Kangjie Lu's messages are also missing from the > > > > archives: > > > > > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210421130105.1226686-1-gregkh@linuxfoundation.org/ > > > > > > > > > > I'm going to guess it's one of two things. The first is that they are > > > sending mail messages with HTML which is getting bounced; the other > > > possibility is that some of the messages were sent only to Greg, and > > > he added the mailing list back to the cc. > > > > > > So for exampple, message-id > > > CA+EnHHSw4X+ubOUNYP2zXNpu70G74NN1Sct2Zin6pRgq--TqhA@mail.gmail.com > > > isn't in lore, but Greg's reply: > > > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nfs/YH%2FfM%2FTsbmcZzwnX@kroah.com/ > > > > > > can be found in lore.kernel.org was presumably because the message > > > where Aditya accused "wild accusations bordering on slander" and his > > > claim that his patches were the fault of a "new static code analyzer" > > > was sent only to Greg? Either that, or it was bounced because he sent > > > it from gmail without suppressing HTML. > > > > I did not "add back" the mailing list, it looks like they sent email in > > html format which prevented it from hitting the public lists. I have > > the originals sent to me that shows the author intended it to be public. > > Yes, the list cc's are all on there. > > It's multipart/alternative with equivalent plain text and html parts, > which appears to be gmail's default behavior. Is that really rejected > by default? Hah, when I sent that mail I quoted parts of the message including the Content-Type headers delineating the parts and got an immediate bounce saying "The message contains HTML subpart, therefore we consider it SPAM or Outlook Virus. TEXT/PLAIN is accepted". Which seems perfectly clear. OK, sorry for the noise! --b.