All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
To: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com>,
	Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
	peterx@redhat.com, Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>,
	Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>,
	"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>
Subject: [PATCH v2 02/24] mm: Clear vmf->pte after pte_unmap_same() returns
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2021 12:12:55 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210427161317.50682-3-peterx@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210427161317.50682-1-peterx@redhat.com>

pte_unmap_same() will always unmap the pte pointer.  After the unmap, vmf->pte
will not be valid any more.  We should clear it.

It was safe only because no one is accessing vmf->pte after pte_unmap_same()
returns, since the only caller of pte_unmap_same() (so far) is do_swap_page(),
where vmf->pte will in most cases be overwritten very soon.

pte_unmap_same() will be used in other places in follow up patches, so that
vmf->pte will not always be re-written.  This patch enables us to call
functions like finish_fault() because that'll conditionally unmap the pte by
checking vmf->pte first.  Or, alloc_set_pte() will make sure to allocate a new
pte even after calling pte_unmap_same().

Since we'll need to modify vmf->pte, directly pass in vmf into pte_unmap_same()
and then we can also avoid the long parameter list.

Reviewed-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
---
 mm/memory.c | 13 +++++++------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
index ffda19542bc6d..955a0bb6b855c 100644
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -2618,19 +2618,20 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(apply_to_existing_page_range);
  * proceeding (but do_wp_page is only called after already making such a check;
  * and do_anonymous_page can safely check later on).
  */
-static inline int pte_unmap_same(struct mm_struct *mm, pmd_t *pmd,
-				pte_t *page_table, pte_t orig_pte)
+static inline int pte_unmap_same(struct vm_fault *vmf)
 {
 	int same = 1;
 #if defined(CONFIG_SMP) || defined(CONFIG_PREEMPTION)
 	if (sizeof(pte_t) > sizeof(unsigned long)) {
-		spinlock_t *ptl = pte_lockptr(mm, pmd);
+		spinlock_t *ptl = pte_lockptr(vmf->vma->vm_mm, vmf->pmd);
 		spin_lock(ptl);
-		same = pte_same(*page_table, orig_pte);
+		same = pte_same(*vmf->pte, vmf->orig_pte);
 		spin_unlock(ptl);
 	}
 #endif
-	pte_unmap(page_table);
+	pte_unmap(vmf->pte);
+	/* After unmap of pte, the pointer is invalid now - clear it. */
+	vmf->pte = NULL;
 	return same;
 }
 
@@ -3319,7 +3320,7 @@ vm_fault_t do_swap_page(struct vm_fault *vmf)
 	vm_fault_t ret = 0;
 	void *shadow = NULL;
 
-	if (!pte_unmap_same(vma->vm_mm, vmf->pmd, vmf->pte, vmf->orig_pte))
+	if (!pte_unmap_same(vmf))
 		goto out;
 
 	entry = pte_to_swp_entry(vmf->orig_pte);
-- 
2.26.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-04-27 16:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-27 16:12 [PATCH v2 00/24] userfaultfd-wp: Support shmem and hugetlbfs Peter Xu
2021-04-27 16:12 ` [PATCH v2 01/24] shmem/userfaultfd: Take care of UFFDIO_COPY_MODE_WP Peter Xu
2021-04-27 16:12 ` Peter Xu [this message]
2021-04-27 16:12 ` [PATCH v2 03/24] mm/userfaultfd: Introduce special pte for unmapped file-backed mem Peter Xu
2021-04-27 16:12 ` [PATCH v2 04/24] mm/swap: Introduce the idea of special swap ptes Peter Xu
2021-04-27 16:12 ` [PATCH v2 05/24] shmem/userfaultfd: Handle uffd-wp special pte in page fault handler Peter Xu
2021-04-27 18:54   ` Peter Xu
2021-04-27 16:12 ` [PATCH v2 06/24] mm: Drop first_index/last_index in zap_details Peter Xu
2021-04-27 16:13 ` [PATCH v2 07/24] mm: Introduce zap_details.zap_flags Peter Xu
2021-04-27 16:13 ` [PATCH v2 08/24] mm: Introduce ZAP_FLAG_SKIP_SWAP Peter Xu
2021-04-27 16:13 ` [PATCH v2 09/24] mm: Pass zap_flags into unmap_mapping_pages() Peter Xu
2021-04-27 16:13 ` [PATCH v2 10/24] shmem/userfaultfd: Persist uffd-wp bit across zapping for file-backed Peter Xu
2021-04-27 16:13 ` [PATCH v2 11/24] shmem/userfaultfd: Allow wr-protect none pte for file-backed mem Peter Xu
2021-04-27 16:13 ` [PATCH v2 12/24] shmem/userfaultfd: Allows file-back mem to be uffd wr-protected on thps Peter Xu
2021-04-27 16:13 ` [PATCH v2 13/24] shmem/userfaultfd: Handle the left-overed special swap ptes Peter Xu
2021-04-27 16:13 ` [PATCH v2 14/24] shmem/userfaultfd: Pass over uffd-wp special swap pte when fork() Peter Xu
2021-04-27 16:13 ` [PATCH v2 15/24] mm/hugetlb: Drop __unmap_hugepage_range definition from hugetlb.h Peter Xu
2021-04-27 16:13 ` [PATCH v2 16/24] hugetlb/userfaultfd: Hook page faults for uffd write protection Peter Xu
2021-04-28  0:07   ` Peter Xu
2021-04-27 16:13 ` [PATCH v2 17/24] hugetlb/userfaultfd: Take care of UFFDIO_COPY_MODE_WP Peter Xu
2021-04-27 16:13 ` [PATCH v2 18/24] hugetlb/userfaultfd: Handle UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT Peter Xu
2021-04-27 16:13 ` [PATCH v2 19/24] mm/hugetlb: Introduce huge version of special swap pte helpers Peter Xu
2021-04-27 16:13 ` [PATCH v2 20/24] hugetlb/userfaultfd: Handle uffd-wp special pte in hugetlb pf handler Peter Xu
2021-04-27 16:13 ` [PATCH v2 21/24] hugetlb/userfaultfd: Allow wr-protect none ptes Peter Xu
2021-04-27 16:13 ` [PATCH v2 22/24] hugetlb/userfaultfd: Only drop uffd-wp special pte if required Peter Xu
2021-04-27 16:13 ` [PATCH v2 23/24] mm/userfaultfd: Enable write protection for shmem & hugetlbfs Peter Xu
2021-04-27 16:13 ` [PATCH v2 24/24] userfaultfd/selftests: Enable uffd-wp for shmem/hugetlbfs Peter Xu
2021-05-12 19:00 ` [PATCH v2 00/24] userfaultfd-wp: Support shmem and hugetlbfs Peter Xu
2021-05-14  7:07   ` Hugh Dickins
2021-05-14  7:07     ` Hugh Dickins
2021-05-14 13:18     ` Peter Xu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210427161317.50682-3-peterx@redhat.com \
    --to=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=jglisse@redhat.com \
    --cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
    --cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
    --cc=nadav.amit@gmail.com \
    --cc=rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.