From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 821DC2F9A for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 06:43:46 +0000 (UTC) IronPort-SDR: 8z0YHeCW5VkDayMLf8WKrqPlpNjSIIQGvDfkuxZhPz9eEj4rpzI8iZmmTKOQzvQh7inx5h+vrL Rs3HXpRGChZg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,9969"; a="217947948" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.82,260,1613462400"; d="scan'208";a="217947948" Received: from orsmga006.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.51]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 29 Apr 2021 23:43:45 -0700 IronPort-SDR: 4rOfv24PM6WHiFGSH9bzpw2vA0yXJwhx6NPRvksNu8aJ6AtBXb7FbxFxz1WeMwkh2snxEXwVIM 49fjJOoYr58g== X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.82,260,1613462400"; d="scan'208";a="388438373" Received: from paasikivi.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.42]) by orsmga006-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 29 Apr 2021 23:43:43 -0700 Received: from paasikivi.fi.intel.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by paasikivi.fi.intel.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 02DBD203B0; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 09:43:40 +0300 (EEST) Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2021 09:43:39 +0300 From: Sakari Ailus To: Deepak R Varma Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/9] staging: media: atomisp: code cleanup fixes Message-ID: <20210430064339.GB3@paasikivi.fi.intel.com> References: X-Mailing-List: linux-staging@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Hi Deepak, On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 11:34:29PM +0530, Deepak R Varma wrote: > This patch set addresses multiple issues reported by of checkpatch script as > WARNING and CHECK complaints. Other feedback received from the > maintainers is incorporated as well. > > Note: > - The patches should be applied in the ascending order. > - Patch count revised to 9 from 6 > - patch 1/9 is not being sent since it was already submitted by > another developer. Then what is now the 2nd patch should have been the first. No need to resend because of just that though. For the rest of the patches apart from 5th, Acked-by: Sakari Ailus -- Sakari Ailus