All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
	Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
	Nitesh Narayan Lal <nitesh@redhat.com>,
	Alex Belits <abelits@marvell.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [patch V2 8/8] hrtimer: Avoid more SMP function calls in clock_was_set()
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2021 13:49:33 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210430164933.GA73701@fuller.cnet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87a6pgfdps.ffs@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>

On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 09:12:15AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> By unconditionally updating the offsets there are more indicators
> whether the SMP function calls on clock_was_set() can be avoided:
> 
>   - When the offset update already happened on the remote CPU then the
>     remote update attempt will yield the same seqeuence number and no
>     IPI is required.
> 
>   - When the remote CPU is currently handling hrtimer_interrupt(). In
>     that case the remote CPU will reevaluate the timer bases before
>     reprogramming anyway, so nothing to do.
> 
>   - After updating it can be checked whether the first expiring timer in
>     the affected clock bases moves before the first expiring (softirq)
>     timer of the CPU. If that's not the case then sending the IPI is not
>     required.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> ---
> V2: Fix the in_hrtirq thinko (Marcelo)
>     Add the missing masking (reported by 0day)
> 
> P.S.: The git branch is updated as well
> 
> ---
>  kernel/time/hrtimer.c |   74 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 65 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> --- a/kernel/time/hrtimer.c
> +++ b/kernel/time/hrtimer.c
> @@ -880,6 +880,68 @@ static void hrtimer_reprogram(struct hrt
>  	tick_program_event(expires, 1);
>  }
>  
> +static bool update_needs_ipi(struct hrtimer_cpu_base *cpu_base,
> +			     unsigned int active)
> +{
> +	struct hrtimer_clock_base *base;
> +	unsigned int seq;
> +	ktime_t expires;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Update the base offsets unconditionally so the following
> +	 * checks whether the SMP function call is required works.
> +	 *
> +	 * The update is safe even when the remote CPU is in the hrtimer
> +	 * interrupt or the hrtimer soft interrupt and expiring affected
> +	 * bases. Either it will see the update before handling a base or
> +	 * it will see it when it finishes the processing and reevaluates
> +	 * the next expiring timer.
> +	 */
> +	seq = cpu_base->clock_was_set_seq;
> +	hrtimer_update_base(cpu_base);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * If the sequence did not change over the update then the
> +	 * remote CPU already handled it.
> +	 */
> +	if (seq == cpu_base->clock_was_set_seq)
> +		return false;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * If the remote CPU is currently handling an hrtimer interrupt, it
> +	 * will reevaluate the first expiring timer of all clock bases
> +	 * before reprogramming. Nothing to do here.
> +	 */
> +	if (cpu_base->in_hrtirq)
> +		return false;

Looks good, thanks.

> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Walk the affected clock bases and check whether the first expiring
> +	 * timer in a clock base is moving ahead of the first expiring timer of
> +	 * @cpu_base. If so, the IPI must be invoked because per CPU clock
> +	 * event devices cannot be remotely reprogrammed.
> +	 */
> +	active &= cpu_base->active_bases;
> +
> +	for_each_active_base(base, cpu_base, active) {
> +		struct timerqueue_node *next;
> +
> +		next = timerqueue_getnext(&base->active);
> +		expires = ktime_sub(next->expires, base->offset);
> +		if (expires < cpu_base->expires_next)
> +			return true;
> +
> +		/* Extra check for softirq clock bases */
> +		if (base->clockid < HRTIMER_BASE_MONOTONIC_SOFT)
> +			continue;
> +		if (cpu_base->softirq_activated)
> +			continue;
> +		if (expires < cpu_base->softirq_expires_next)
> +			return true;
> +	}
> +	return false;
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * Clock was set. This might affect CLOCK_REALTIME, CLOCK_TAI and
>   * CLOCK_BOOTTIME (for late sleep time injection).
> @@ -914,16 +976,10 @@ void clock_was_set(unsigned int bases)
>  		unsigned long flags;
>  
>  		raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&cpu_base->lock, flags);
> -		/*
> -		 * Only send the IPI when there are timers queued in one of
> -		 * the affected clock bases. Otherwise update the base
> -		 * remote to ensure that the next enqueue of a timer on
> -		 * such a clock base will see the correct offsets.
> -		 */
> -		if (cpu_base->active_bases & bases)
> +
> +		if (update_needs_ipi(cpu_base, bases))
>  			cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, mask);
> -		else
> -			hrtimer_update_base(cpu_base);
> +
>  		raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cpu_base->lock, flags);
>  	}
>  
> 
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2021-04-30 16:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-27  8:25 [patch 0/8] hrtimers: Overhaul the clock_was_set() logic Thomas Gleixner
2021-04-27  8:25 ` [patch 1/8] hrtimer: Ensure timerfd notification for HIGHRES=n Thomas Gleixner
2021-04-27  8:25 ` [patch 2/8] hrtimer: Force clock_was_set() handling for the HIGHRES=n, NOHZ=y case Thomas Gleixner
2021-05-12 14:59   ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-05-12 16:40     ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-04-27  8:25 ` [patch 3/8] timerfd: Provide timerfd_resume() Thomas Gleixner
2021-04-27  8:25 ` [patch 4/8] timekeeping: Distangle resume and clock-was-set events Thomas Gleixner
2021-04-27  8:25 ` [patch 5/8] time/timekeeping: Avoid invoking clock_was_set() twice Thomas Gleixner
2021-04-27  8:25 ` [patch 6/8] hrtimer: Add bases argument to clock_was_set() Thomas Gleixner
2021-04-27  8:25 ` [patch 7/8] hrtimer: Avoid unnecessary SMP function calls in clock_was_set() Thomas Gleixner
2021-05-13 14:59   ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-05-14 18:52     ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-05-14 23:28       ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-05-15  0:24         ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-04-27  8:25 ` [patch 8/8] hrtimer: Avoid more " Thomas Gleixner
2021-04-27 15:11   ` Marcelo Tosatti
2021-04-27 19:59     ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-04-30  7:12       ` [patch V2 " Thomas Gleixner
2021-04-30 16:49         ` Marcelo Tosatti [this message]
2021-05-13  7:47         ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-05-14 19:08           ` Thomas Gleixner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210430164933.GA73701@fuller.cnet \
    --to=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=abelits@marvell.com \
    --cc=anna-maria@linutronix.de \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nitesh@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.