From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Seiderer Date: Sun, 2 May 2021 12:27:46 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH v1 1/3] package/libtomcrypt: add pkgconfig support In-Reply-To: <45c379f0-8ca0-6891-1b1e-b166600da9ca@mind.be> References: <20210412195527.9282-1-ps.report@gmx.net> <20210412221453.5195d4b5@windsurf.home> <20210412231516.6cbc09f2@gmx.net> <45c379f0-8ca0-6891-1b1e-b166600da9ca@mind.be> Message-ID: <20210502122746.7988707d@gmx.net> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Hello Arnout, On Sat, 1 May 2021 15:18:42 +0200, Arnout Vandecappelle wrote: > On 12/04/2021 23:15, Peter Seiderer wrote: > > Hello Thomas, > > > > On Mon, 12 Apr 2021 22:14:53 +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > > > >> On Mon, 12 Apr 2021 21:55:25 +0200 > >> Peter Seiderer wrote: > >> > >>> Signed-off-by: Peter Seiderer > >> > >> Is there any specific motivation? Does this had a chance of going > >> upstream ? > > > > For an custom project, previously developed on with cmake on ubuntu (which > > provides the pkgconfig file).... > > > > Can try to suggest upstream... > > Adding a .pc file in Buildroot usually doesn't make much sense, because no > package that depends on it is going to use it. So yes, please organise this > upstream. But a buildroot provided library should be usable for buildroot packages AND out-of-tree/custom packages? Nevertheless, did take a second look at the libtomcrypt sources, already providing a libtomcrypt.pc.in template (but only used/installed in case of 'makefile.shared'/'makefile.unix' and the buildroot compile uses the default 'makefile' one)... Regards, Peter > > Therefore, I've marked this patch as Rejected. > > Regards, > Arnout