From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,HK_RANDOM_FROM,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 862AAC433B4 for ; Fri, 7 May 2021 11:14:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6040461415 for ; Fri, 7 May 2021 11:14:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233705AbhEGLPE convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 May 2021 07:15:04 -0400 Received: from mail.kingsoft.com ([114.255.44.145]:24564 "EHLO mail.kingsoft.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230007AbhEGLPC (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 May 2021 07:15:02 -0400 X-AuditID: 0a580157-bebff70000027901-e6-609520f9e94f Received: from mail.kingsoft.com (localhost [10.88.1.79]) (using TLS with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mail.kingsoft.com (SMG-1-NODE-87) with SMTP id 05.AE.30977.9F025906; Fri, 7 May 2021 19:14:01 +0800 (HKT) Received: from alex-virtual-machine (10.88.1.103) by KSBJMAIL4.kingsoft.cn (10.88.1.79) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2176.2; Fri, 7 May 2021 19:14:00 +0800 Date: Fri, 7 May 2021 19:14:00 +0800 From: Aili Yao To: "HORIGUCHI =?UTF-8?B?TkFPWUE=?=(=?UTF-8?B?5aCA5Y+j44CA55u05Lmf?=)" CC: "Luck, Tony" , Naoya Horiguchi , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , Andrew Morton , Oscar Salvador , David Hildenbrand , "Borislav Petkov" , Andy Lutomirski , Jue Wang , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] mm,hwpoison: fix sending SIGBUS for Action Required MCE Message-ID: <20210507191400.6258dee6@alex-virtual-machine> In-Reply-To: <20210507052422.GB2158342@hori.linux.bs1.fc.nec.co.jp> References: <20210421005728.1994268-1-nao.horiguchi@gmail.com> <87ba79daaba1416589b203118be096cb@intel.com> <20210507052422.GB2158342@hori.linux.bs1.fc.nec.co.jp> Organization: kingsoft X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.8 (GTK+ 2.24.30; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-Originating-IP: [10.88.1.103] X-ClientProxiedBy: KSBJMAIL1.kingsoft.cn (10.88.1.31) To KSBJMAIL4.kingsoft.cn (10.88.1.79) X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFprGIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsXCFcHor/tTYWqCQdtHCYs569ewWXze8I/N 4uv6X8wWN2+ZWFzeNYfN4t6a/6wW53etZbVYNe8Os8XFxgOMFmemFVm8uXCPxeJZ61UWBx6P 7619LB47Z91l91iwqdRj8Z6XTB6bVnWyeWz6NInd48SM3yweL65uZPF4v+8qm8fm09UenzfJ BXBHcdmkpOZklqUW6dslcGWs/7yKrWAtW8XuFffZGxi7WLsYOTkkBEwk5l67ytbFyMUhJDCd SeL9wndMEM4zRon+ra9YQKpYBFQkTlybzQhiswmoSuy6NwusW0QgSWLx7K9gDcwCW5klPm+6 zwySEBYIlTj76ylYA6+AlcSRczvAGjgFnCXubH0Gte4qo8SatSvAEvwCYhK9V/4DTeIAusle 4vF6RYheQYmTM5+AHcEsoCnRuv03O4StLbFs4WuwXUICihKHl/xih3hHXuLu7+mMEHasRNOB W2wTGIVnIRk1C8moWUhGLWBkXsXIUpybbriJERJ14TsY5zV91DvEyMTBeIhRgoNZSYT39KLJ CUK8KYmVValF+fFFpTmpxYcYpTlYlMR5G2cCpQTSE0tSs1NTC1KLYLJMHJxSDUymswX1lYW1 mZ8tKDqy4ufZzsmcljr7FmQeXurfWjHdZ+l1lYqlmn57F855c5xpmR6zmXfW2UjePpdpDLdq VdsuT9O+cbZ4auC1JXued+1ntemoWKrrlH97q76E6c4uoa3n03cvkbhlvj1Mn8/kvYV4V4O+ kF5mc8qdWYteP3rsLZIpVHm/zZ3Zc3vc6rfbj+yOEQ03W39j1d93m74HfhT7der7xqr5nVqZ M79/sGDoY1vzcz/b2hXcXZo7zayD9rBmXDpkxai396C0YvJTjbj0ysW3/21LK315vfrogvZv CcrLGV5oOK/2Kt2T+ejppPjjTA7lullTxCxSnxon7VY4sWuBrJ7/7muhpm5ntjEpsRRnJBpq MRcVJwIA6+vuZCkDAAA= Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 7 May 2021 05:24:22 +0000 HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口　直也) wrote: > On Fri, May 07, 2021 at 03:37:07AM +0000, Luck, Tony wrote: > > >> I updated the series based on previous feedbacks/discussions. > > > > > > Tested-by: Tony Luck > > > > Maybe this series should get a "Cc: stable" tag too? > > The second patch (I squashed 2/3 and 3/3 into one in v4) is a little > too large (more than 100 lines of change), which doesn't meet stable rule. > But the first patch looks suitable to me for stable. Before cc:stable, would you please do one stress test first? It failed in my server, but I didn't dig into it, maybe the fail is meaningless. Just a small suggestion. Thanks! Aili Yao