All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>,
	Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com>,
	Jintack Lim <jintack@cs.columbia.edu>,
	Haibo Xu <haibo.xu@linaro.org>, James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
	kernel-team@android.com
Subject: [PATCH v4 14/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Handle SPSR_EL2 specially
Date: Mon, 10 May 2021 17:58:28 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210510165920.1913477-15-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210510165920.1913477-1-maz@kernel.org>

SPSR_EL2 needs special attention when running nested on ARMv8.3:

If taking an exception while running at vEL2 (actually EL1), the
HW will update the SPSR_EL1 register with the EL1 mode. We need
to track this in order to make sure that accesses to the virtual
view of SPSR_EL2 is correct.

To do so, we place an illegal value in SPSR_EL1.M, and patch it
accordingly if required when accessing it.

Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c            | 23 +++++++++++++++--
 2 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
index 1c10fbe7d1c3..f63872db1e39 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
@@ -238,6 +238,43 @@ static inline bool is_hyp_ctxt(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	return __is_hyp_ctxt(&vcpu->arch.ctxt);
 }
 
+static inline u64 __fixup_spsr_el2_write(struct kvm_cpu_context *ctxt, u64 val)
+{
+	if (!__vcpu_el2_e2h_is_set(ctxt)) {
+		/*
+		 * Clear the .M field when writing SPSR to the CPU, so that we
+		 * can detect when the CPU clobbered our SPSR copy during a
+		 * local exception.
+		 */
+		val &= ~0xc;
+	}
+
+	return val;
+}
+
+static inline u64 __fixup_spsr_el2_read(const struct kvm_cpu_context *ctxt, u64 val)
+{
+	if (__vcpu_el2_e2h_is_set(ctxt))
+		return val;
+
+	/*
+	 * SPSR.M == 0 means the CPU has not touched the SPSR, so the
+	 * register has still the value we saved on the last write.
+	 */
+	if ((val & 0xc) == 0)
+		return ctxt_sys_reg(ctxt, SPSR_EL2);
+
+	/*
+	 * Otherwise there was a "local" exception on the CPU,
+	 * which from the guest's point of view was being taken from
+	 * EL2 to EL2, although it actually happened to be from
+	 * EL1 to EL1.
+	 * So we need to fix the .M field in SPSR, to make it look
+	 * like EL2, which is what the guest would expect.
+	 */
+	return (val & ~0x0c) | CurrentEL_EL2;
+}
+
 /*
  * The layout of SPSR for an AArch32 state is different when observed from an
  * AArch64 SPSR_ELx or an AArch32 SPSR_*. This function generates the AArch32
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
index 70fa43f599e4..2c1ab8cd58b4 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
@@ -137,11 +137,14 @@ u64 vcpu_read_sys_reg(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int reg)
 			goto memory_read;
 
 		/*
-		 * ELR_EL2 is special cased for now.
+		 * ELR_EL2 and SPSR_EL2 are special cased for now.
 		 */
 		switch (reg) {
 		case ELR_EL2:
 			return read_sysreg_el1(SYS_ELR);
+		case SPSR_EL2:
+			val = read_sysreg_el1(SYS_SPSR);
+			return __fixup_spsr_el2_read(&vcpu->arch.ctxt, val);
 		}
 
 		/*
@@ -198,6 +201,10 @@ void vcpu_write_sys_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 val, int reg)
 		case ELR_EL2:
 			write_sysreg_el1(val, SYS_ELR);
 			return;
+		case SPSR_EL2:
+			val = __fixup_spsr_el2_write(&vcpu->arch.ctxt, val);
+			write_sysreg_el1(val, SYS_SPSR);
+			return;
 		}
 
 		/* No EL1 counterpart? We're done here.? */
@@ -1544,6 +1551,18 @@ static bool access_sp_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 	return true;
 }
 
+static bool access_spsr_el2(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+			    struct sys_reg_params *p,
+			    const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
+{
+	if (p->is_write)
+		vcpu_write_sys_reg(vcpu, p->regval, SPSR_EL2);
+	else
+		p->regval = vcpu_read_sys_reg(vcpu, SPSR_EL2);
+
+	return true;
+}
+
 /*
  * Architected system registers.
  * Important: Must be sorted ascending by Op0, Op1, CRn, CRm, Op2
@@ -1971,7 +1990,7 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc sys_reg_descs[] = {
 	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_VTCR_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, VTCR_EL2, 0 },
 
 	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_DACR32_EL2), NULL, reset_unknown, DACR32_EL2 },
-	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_SPSR_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, SPSR_EL2, 0 },
+	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_SPSR_EL2), access_spsr_el2, reset_val, SPSR_EL2, 0 },
 	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_ELR_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, ELR_EL2, 0 },
 	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_SP_EL1), access_sp_el1},
 
-- 
2.29.2


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kernel-team@android.com, Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 14/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Handle SPSR_EL2 specially
Date: Mon, 10 May 2021 17:58:28 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210510165920.1913477-15-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210510165920.1913477-1-maz@kernel.org>

SPSR_EL2 needs special attention when running nested on ARMv8.3:

If taking an exception while running at vEL2 (actually EL1), the
HW will update the SPSR_EL1 register with the EL1 mode. We need
to track this in order to make sure that accesses to the virtual
view of SPSR_EL2 is correct.

To do so, we place an illegal value in SPSR_EL1.M, and patch it
accordingly if required when accessing it.

Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c            | 23 +++++++++++++++--
 2 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
index 1c10fbe7d1c3..f63872db1e39 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
@@ -238,6 +238,43 @@ static inline bool is_hyp_ctxt(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	return __is_hyp_ctxt(&vcpu->arch.ctxt);
 }
 
+static inline u64 __fixup_spsr_el2_write(struct kvm_cpu_context *ctxt, u64 val)
+{
+	if (!__vcpu_el2_e2h_is_set(ctxt)) {
+		/*
+		 * Clear the .M field when writing SPSR to the CPU, so that we
+		 * can detect when the CPU clobbered our SPSR copy during a
+		 * local exception.
+		 */
+		val &= ~0xc;
+	}
+
+	return val;
+}
+
+static inline u64 __fixup_spsr_el2_read(const struct kvm_cpu_context *ctxt, u64 val)
+{
+	if (__vcpu_el2_e2h_is_set(ctxt))
+		return val;
+
+	/*
+	 * SPSR.M == 0 means the CPU has not touched the SPSR, so the
+	 * register has still the value we saved on the last write.
+	 */
+	if ((val & 0xc) == 0)
+		return ctxt_sys_reg(ctxt, SPSR_EL2);
+
+	/*
+	 * Otherwise there was a "local" exception on the CPU,
+	 * which from the guest's point of view was being taken from
+	 * EL2 to EL2, although it actually happened to be from
+	 * EL1 to EL1.
+	 * So we need to fix the .M field in SPSR, to make it look
+	 * like EL2, which is what the guest would expect.
+	 */
+	return (val & ~0x0c) | CurrentEL_EL2;
+}
+
 /*
  * The layout of SPSR for an AArch32 state is different when observed from an
  * AArch64 SPSR_ELx or an AArch32 SPSR_*. This function generates the AArch32
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
index 70fa43f599e4..2c1ab8cd58b4 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
@@ -137,11 +137,14 @@ u64 vcpu_read_sys_reg(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int reg)
 			goto memory_read;
 
 		/*
-		 * ELR_EL2 is special cased for now.
+		 * ELR_EL2 and SPSR_EL2 are special cased for now.
 		 */
 		switch (reg) {
 		case ELR_EL2:
 			return read_sysreg_el1(SYS_ELR);
+		case SPSR_EL2:
+			val = read_sysreg_el1(SYS_SPSR);
+			return __fixup_spsr_el2_read(&vcpu->arch.ctxt, val);
 		}
 
 		/*
@@ -198,6 +201,10 @@ void vcpu_write_sys_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 val, int reg)
 		case ELR_EL2:
 			write_sysreg_el1(val, SYS_ELR);
 			return;
+		case SPSR_EL2:
+			val = __fixup_spsr_el2_write(&vcpu->arch.ctxt, val);
+			write_sysreg_el1(val, SYS_SPSR);
+			return;
 		}
 
 		/* No EL1 counterpart? We're done here.? */
@@ -1544,6 +1551,18 @@ static bool access_sp_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 	return true;
 }
 
+static bool access_spsr_el2(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+			    struct sys_reg_params *p,
+			    const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
+{
+	if (p->is_write)
+		vcpu_write_sys_reg(vcpu, p->regval, SPSR_EL2);
+	else
+		p->regval = vcpu_read_sys_reg(vcpu, SPSR_EL2);
+
+	return true;
+}
+
 /*
  * Architected system registers.
  * Important: Must be sorted ascending by Op0, Op1, CRn, CRm, Op2
@@ -1971,7 +1990,7 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc sys_reg_descs[] = {
 	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_VTCR_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, VTCR_EL2, 0 },
 
 	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_DACR32_EL2), NULL, reset_unknown, DACR32_EL2 },
-	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_SPSR_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, SPSR_EL2, 0 },
+	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_SPSR_EL2), access_spsr_el2, reset_val, SPSR_EL2, 0 },
 	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_ELR_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, ELR_EL2, 0 },
 	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_SP_EL1), access_sp_el1},
 
-- 
2.29.2

_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>,
	Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com>,
	Jintack Lim <jintack@cs.columbia.edu>,
	Haibo Xu <haibo.xu@linaro.org>, James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
	kernel-team@android.com
Subject: [PATCH v4 14/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Handle SPSR_EL2 specially
Date: Mon, 10 May 2021 17:58:28 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210510165920.1913477-15-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210510165920.1913477-1-maz@kernel.org>

SPSR_EL2 needs special attention when running nested on ARMv8.3:

If taking an exception while running at vEL2 (actually EL1), the
HW will update the SPSR_EL1 register with the EL1 mode. We need
to track this in order to make sure that accesses to the virtual
view of SPSR_EL2 is correct.

To do so, we place an illegal value in SPSR_EL1.M, and patch it
accordingly if required when accessing it.

Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c            | 23 +++++++++++++++--
 2 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
index 1c10fbe7d1c3..f63872db1e39 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
@@ -238,6 +238,43 @@ static inline bool is_hyp_ctxt(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	return __is_hyp_ctxt(&vcpu->arch.ctxt);
 }
 
+static inline u64 __fixup_spsr_el2_write(struct kvm_cpu_context *ctxt, u64 val)
+{
+	if (!__vcpu_el2_e2h_is_set(ctxt)) {
+		/*
+		 * Clear the .M field when writing SPSR to the CPU, so that we
+		 * can detect when the CPU clobbered our SPSR copy during a
+		 * local exception.
+		 */
+		val &= ~0xc;
+	}
+
+	return val;
+}
+
+static inline u64 __fixup_spsr_el2_read(const struct kvm_cpu_context *ctxt, u64 val)
+{
+	if (__vcpu_el2_e2h_is_set(ctxt))
+		return val;
+
+	/*
+	 * SPSR.M == 0 means the CPU has not touched the SPSR, so the
+	 * register has still the value we saved on the last write.
+	 */
+	if ((val & 0xc) == 0)
+		return ctxt_sys_reg(ctxt, SPSR_EL2);
+
+	/*
+	 * Otherwise there was a "local" exception on the CPU,
+	 * which from the guest's point of view was being taken from
+	 * EL2 to EL2, although it actually happened to be from
+	 * EL1 to EL1.
+	 * So we need to fix the .M field in SPSR, to make it look
+	 * like EL2, which is what the guest would expect.
+	 */
+	return (val & ~0x0c) | CurrentEL_EL2;
+}
+
 /*
  * The layout of SPSR for an AArch32 state is different when observed from an
  * AArch64 SPSR_ELx or an AArch32 SPSR_*. This function generates the AArch32
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
index 70fa43f599e4..2c1ab8cd58b4 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
@@ -137,11 +137,14 @@ u64 vcpu_read_sys_reg(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int reg)
 			goto memory_read;
 
 		/*
-		 * ELR_EL2 is special cased for now.
+		 * ELR_EL2 and SPSR_EL2 are special cased for now.
 		 */
 		switch (reg) {
 		case ELR_EL2:
 			return read_sysreg_el1(SYS_ELR);
+		case SPSR_EL2:
+			val = read_sysreg_el1(SYS_SPSR);
+			return __fixup_spsr_el2_read(&vcpu->arch.ctxt, val);
 		}
 
 		/*
@@ -198,6 +201,10 @@ void vcpu_write_sys_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 val, int reg)
 		case ELR_EL2:
 			write_sysreg_el1(val, SYS_ELR);
 			return;
+		case SPSR_EL2:
+			val = __fixup_spsr_el2_write(&vcpu->arch.ctxt, val);
+			write_sysreg_el1(val, SYS_SPSR);
+			return;
 		}
 
 		/* No EL1 counterpart? We're done here.? */
@@ -1544,6 +1551,18 @@ static bool access_sp_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 	return true;
 }
 
+static bool access_spsr_el2(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+			    struct sys_reg_params *p,
+			    const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
+{
+	if (p->is_write)
+		vcpu_write_sys_reg(vcpu, p->regval, SPSR_EL2);
+	else
+		p->regval = vcpu_read_sys_reg(vcpu, SPSR_EL2);
+
+	return true;
+}
+
 /*
  * Architected system registers.
  * Important: Must be sorted ascending by Op0, Op1, CRn, CRm, Op2
@@ -1971,7 +1990,7 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc sys_reg_descs[] = {
 	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_VTCR_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, VTCR_EL2, 0 },
 
 	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_DACR32_EL2), NULL, reset_unknown, DACR32_EL2 },
-	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_SPSR_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, SPSR_EL2, 0 },
+	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_SPSR_EL2), access_spsr_el2, reset_val, SPSR_EL2, 0 },
 	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_ELR_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, ELR_EL2, 0 },
 	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_SP_EL1), access_sp_el1},
 
-- 
2.29.2


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-05-10 17:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 226+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-10 16:58 [PATCH v4 00/66] KVM: arm64: ARMv8.3/8.4 Nested Virtualization support Marc Zyngier
2021-05-10 16:58 ` [PATCH v4 01/66] arm64: Add ARM64_HAS_NESTED_VIRT cpufeature Marc Zyngier
2021-05-20 13:32   ` Zenghui Yu
2021-05-24 12:38     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-05-10 16:58 ` [PATCH v4 02/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Introduce nested virtualization VCPU feature Marc Zyngier
2021-05-10 16:58 ` [PATCH v4 03/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Reset VCPU to EL2 registers if VCPU nested virt is set Marc Zyngier
2021-05-10 16:58 ` [PATCH v4 04/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Allow userspace to set PSR_MODE_EL2x Marc Zyngier
2021-05-10 16:58 ` [PATCH v4 05/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Add EL2 system registers to vcpu context Marc Zyngier
2021-05-10 16:58 ` [PATCH v4 06/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Add nested virt VCPU primitives for vEL2 VCPU state Marc Zyngier
2021-05-10 16:58 ` [PATCH v4 07/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Handle HCR_EL2.NV system register traps Marc Zyngier
2021-05-10 16:58 ` [PATCH v4 08/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Reset VMPIDR_EL2 and VPIDR_EL2 to sane values Marc Zyngier
2021-05-10 16:58 ` [PATCH v4 09/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Support virtual EL2 exceptions Marc Zyngier
2021-05-20 12:55   ` Zenghui Yu
2021-05-24 12:35     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-05-10 16:58 ` [PATCH v4 10/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Inject HVC exceptions to the virtual EL2 Marc Zyngier
2021-05-10 16:58 ` [PATCH v4 11/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Handle trapped ERET from " Marc Zyngier
2021-05-10 16:58 ` [PATCH v4 12/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Add non-VHE-EL2->EL1 translation helpers Marc Zyngier
2021-05-10 16:58 ` [PATCH v4 13/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Handle virtual EL2 registers in vcpu_read/write_sys_reg() Marc Zyngier
2021-05-10 16:58 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2021-05-10 16:58 ` [PATCH v4 15/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Handle HCR_EL2.E2H specially Marc Zyngier
2021-05-10 16:58 ` [PATCH v4 16/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Save/Restore vEL2 sysregs Marc Zyngier
2021-05-10 16:58 ` [PATCH v4 17/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Emulate PSTATE.M for a guest hypervisor Marc Zyngier
2021-05-10 16:58 ` [PATCH v4 18/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Trap EL1 VM register accesses in virtual EL2 Marc Zyngier
2021-05-10 16:58 ` [PATCH v4 19/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Trap SPSR_EL1, ELR_EL1 and VBAR_EL1 from " Marc Zyngier
2021-05-10 16:58 ` [PATCH v4 20/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Trap CPACR_EL1 access in " Marc Zyngier
2021-05-10 16:58 ` [PATCH v4 21/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Handle PSCI call via smc from the guest Marc Zyngier
2021-05-10 16:58 ` [PATCH v4 22/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Respect virtual HCR_EL2.TWX setting Marc Zyngier
2021-05-10 16:58 ` [PATCH v4 23/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Respect virtual CPTR_EL2.{TFP, FPEN} settings Marc Zyngier
2021-05-10 16:58 ` [PATCH v4 24/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Respect the virtual HCR_EL2.NV bit setting Marc Zyngier
2021-05-10 16:58 ` [PATCH v4 25/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Respect virtual HCR_EL2.TVM and TRVM settings Marc Zyngier
2021-05-10 16:58 ` [PATCH v4 26/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Respect the virtual HCR_EL2.NV1 bit setting Marc Zyngier
2021-05-10 16:58 ` [PATCH v4 27/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Emulate EL12 register accesses from the virtual EL2 Marc Zyngier
2021-05-10 16:58 ` [PATCH v4 28/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Forward debug traps to the nested guest Marc Zyngier
2021-05-10 16:58 ` [PATCH v4 29/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Configure HCR_EL2 for nested virtualization Marc Zyngier
2021-05-10 16:58 ` [PATCH v4 30/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Only toggle cache for virtual EL2 when SCTLR_EL2 changes Marc Zyngier
2021-05-10 16:58 ` [PATCH v4 31/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Filter out unsupported features from ID regs Marc Zyngier
2021-05-10 16:58 ` [PATCH v4 32/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Hide RAS from nested guests Marc Zyngier
2021-05-10 16:58 ` [PATCH v4 33/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Support multiple nested Stage-2 mmu structures Marc Zyngier
2021-05-10 16:58 ` [PATCH v4 34/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Implement nested Stage-2 page table walk logic Marc Zyngier
2021-05-10 16:58 ` [PATCH v4 35/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Handle shadow stage 2 page faults Marc Zyngier
2021-05-10 16:58 ` [PATCH v4 36/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Restrict S2 RD/WR permissions to match the guest's Marc Zyngier
2021-05-10 16:58 ` [PATCH v4 37/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Unmap/flush shadow stage 2 page tables Marc Zyngier
2021-05-10 16:58 ` [PATCH v4 38/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Introduce sys_reg_desc.forward_trap Marc Zyngier
2021-05-10 16:58 ` [PATCH v4 39/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Set a handler for the system instruction traps Marc Zyngier
2021-05-10 16:58 ` [PATCH v4 40/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Trap and emulate AT instructions from virtual EL2 Marc Zyngier
2021-05-10 16:58 ` [PATCH v4 41/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Trap and emulate TLBI " Marc Zyngier
2021-07-14 16:40   ` Chase Conklin
2021-05-10 16:58 ` [PATCH v4 42/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Fold guest's HCR_EL2 configuration into the host's Marc Zyngier
2021-05-10 16:58 ` [PATCH v4 43/66] KVM: arm64: nv: arch_timer: Support hyp timer emulation Marc Zyngier
2021-05-10 16:58 ` [PATCH v4 44/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Add handling of EL2-specific timer registers Marc Zyngier
2021-05-10 16:58 ` [PATCH v4 45/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Load timer before the GIC Marc Zyngier
2021-05-10 16:59 ` [PATCH v4 46/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Nested GICv3 Support Marc Zyngier
2021-05-10 16:59 ` [PATCH v4 47/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Don't load the GICv4 context on entering a nested guest Marc Zyngier
2021-05-10 16:59 ` [PATCH v4 48/66] KVM: arm64: nv: vgic: Emulate the HW bit in software Marc Zyngier
2021-05-10 16:59 ` [PATCH v4 49/66] KVM: arm64: nv: vgic: Allow userland to set VGIC maintenance IRQ Marc Zyngier
2021-05-10 16:59 ` [PATCH v4 50/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Implement maintenance interrupt forwarding Marc Zyngier
2021-05-10 16:59 ` [PATCH v4 51/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Add nested GICv3 tracepoints Marc Zyngier
2021-05-10 16:59 ` [PATCH v4 52/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Allow userspace to request KVM_ARM_VCPU_NESTED_VIRT Marc Zyngier
2021-05-10 16:59 ` [PATCH v4 53/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Add handling of ARMv8.4-TTL TLB invalidation Marc Zyngier
2021-05-10 16:59 ` [PATCH v4 54/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Invalidate TLBs based on shadow S2 TTL-like information Marc Zyngier
2021-05-10 16:59 ` [PATCH v4 55/66] KVM: arm64: Allow populating S2 SW bits Marc Zyngier
2021-05-10 16:59 ` [PATCH v4 56/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Tag shadow S2 entries with nested level Marc Zyngier
2021-05-10 16:59 ` [PATCH v4 57/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Add include containing the VNCR_EL2 offsets Marc Zyngier
2021-05-10 16:59 ` [PATCH v4 58/66] KVM: arm64: Map VNCR-capable registers to a separate page Marc Zyngier
2021-05-10 16:59 ` [PATCH v4 59/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Move nested vgic state into the sysreg file Marc Zyngier
2021-05-10 16:59 ` [PATCH v4 60/66] KVM: arm64: Add ARMv8.4 Enhanced Nested Virt cpufeature Marc Zyngier
2021-05-10 16:59 ` [PATCH v4 61/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Synchronize PSTATE early on exit Marc Zyngier
2021-05-10 16:59 ` [PATCH v4 62/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Sync nested timer state with ARMv8.4 Marc Zyngier
2021-05-10 16:59 ` [PATCH v4 63/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Allocate VNCR page when required Marc Zyngier
2021-05-10 16:59 ` [PATCH v4 64/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Enable ARMv8.4-NV support Marc Zyngier
2021-05-10 16:59 ` [PATCH v4 65/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Fast-track 'InHost' exception returns Marc Zyngier
2021-05-10 16:59 ` [PATCH v4 66/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Fast-track EL1 TLBIs for VHE guests Marc Zyngier
2021-06-03  7:07 ` [PATCH v4 00/66] KVM: arm64: ARMv8.3/8.4 Nested Virtualization support Jamie Iles
2021-06-03  8:39   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-03 11:08     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-07  9:59     ` Jamie Iles

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210510165920.1913477-15-maz@kernel.org \
    --to=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
    --cc=andre.przywara@arm.com \
    --cc=christoffer.dall@arm.com \
    --cc=haibo.xu@linaro.org \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=jintack@cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH v4 14/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Handle SPSR_EL2 specially' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.