All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
	Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
	Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 5/7] KVM: nVMX: Reset eVMCS clean fields data from prepare_vmcs02()
Date: Mon, 17 May 2021 15:50:52 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210517135054.1914802-6-vkuznets@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210517135054.1914802-1-vkuznets@redhat.com>

When nested state migration happens during L1's execution, it
is incorrect to modify eVMCS as it is L1 who 'owns' it at the moment.
At lease genuine Hyper-v seems to not be very happy when 'clean fields'
data changes underneath it.

'Clean fields' data is used in KVM twice: by copy_enlightened_to_vmcs12()
and prepare_vmcs02_rare() so we can reset it from prepare_vmcs02() instead.

Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c | 14 ++++++++------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
index eb2d25a93356..3bfbf991bf45 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
@@ -2081,14 +2081,10 @@ void nested_sync_vmcs12_to_shadow(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
 	struct vcpu_vmx *vmx = to_vmx(vcpu);
 
-	if (vmx->nested.hv_evmcs) {
+	if (vmx->nested.hv_evmcs)
 		copy_vmcs12_to_enlightened(vmx);
-		/* All fields are clean */
-		vmx->nested.hv_evmcs->hv_clean_fields |=
-			HV_VMX_ENLIGHTENED_CLEAN_FIELD_ALL;
-	} else {
+	else
 		copy_vmcs12_to_shadow(vmx);
-	}
 
 	vmx->nested.need_vmcs12_to_shadow_sync = false;
 }
@@ -2629,6 +2625,12 @@ static int prepare_vmcs02(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vmcs12 *vmcs12,
 
 	kvm_rsp_write(vcpu, vmcs12->guest_rsp);
 	kvm_rip_write(vcpu, vmcs12->guest_rip);
+
+	/* Mark all fields as clean so L1 hypervisor can set what's dirty */
+	if (hv_evmcs)
+		vmx->nested.hv_evmcs->hv_clean_fields |=
+			HV_VMX_ENLIGHTENED_CLEAN_FIELD_ALL;
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
-- 
2.31.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-05-17 13:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-17 13:50 [PATCH v2 0/7] KVM: nVMX: Fixes for nested state migration when eVMCS is in use Vitaly Kuznetsov
2021-05-17 13:50 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] KVM: nVMX: Introduce nested_evmcs_is_used() Vitaly Kuznetsov
2021-05-24 12:11   ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-05-24 12:35     ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2021-05-26 14:34       ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-05-27  7:54         ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2021-05-27 14:10           ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-05-24 13:54   ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-05-24 14:09     ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2021-05-24 14:18       ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-05-24 14:37         ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2021-05-17 13:50 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] KVM: nVMX: Release enlightened VMCS on VMCLEAR Vitaly Kuznetsov
2021-05-24 12:13   ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-05-17 13:50 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] KVM: nVMX: Ignore 'hv_clean_fields' data when eVMCS data is copied in vmx_get_nested_state() Vitaly Kuznetsov
2021-05-24 12:26   ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-05-24 13:01     ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2021-05-24 13:58       ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-05-26 14:44         ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-05-24 13:56   ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-05-24 14:12     ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2021-05-17 13:50 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] KVM: nVMX: Force enlightened VMCS sync from nested_vmx_failValid() Vitaly Kuznetsov
2021-05-24 12:27   ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-05-17 13:50 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov [this message]
2021-05-24 12:34   ` [PATCH v2 5/7] KVM: nVMX: Reset eVMCS clean fields data from prepare_vmcs02() Maxim Levitsky
2021-05-24 13:07     ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2021-05-17 13:50 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] KVM: nVMX: Request to sync eVMCS from VMCS12 after migration Vitaly Kuznetsov
2021-05-24 12:35   ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-05-17 13:50 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] KVM: selftests: evmcs_test: Test that KVM_STATE_NESTED_EVMCS is never lost Vitaly Kuznetsov
2021-05-24 12:36   ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-05-24 12:08 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] KVM: nVMX: Fixes for nested state migration when eVMCS is in use Maxim Levitsky
2021-05-24 12:44   ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2021-05-26 14:41     ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-05-27  8:01       ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2021-05-27 14:11         ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-05-27 14:17           ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-05-24 14:01 ` Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210517135054.1914802-6-vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --to=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.