From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: ardb@kernel.org, broonie@kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
james.morse@arm.com, madvenka@linux.microsoft.com,
mark.rutland@arm.com, maz@kernel.org, suzuki.poulose@arm.com,
will@kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 4/6] arm64: smp: remove stack from secondary_data
Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 12:50:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210520115031.18509-5-mark.rutland@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210520115031.18509-1-mark.rutland@arm.com>
When we boot a secondary CPU, we pass it a task and a stack to use. As
the stack is always the task's stack, which can be derived from the
task, let's have the secondary CPU derive this itself and avoid passing
redundant information.
There should be no functional change as a result of this patch.
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Suzuki Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/smp.h | 2 --
arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c | 1 -
arch/arm64/kernel/head.S | 7 ++++---
arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c | 2 --
4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/smp.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/smp.h
index 0e357757c0cc..fc55f5a57a06 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/smp.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/smp.h
@@ -73,12 +73,10 @@ asmlinkage void secondary_start_kernel(void);
/*
* Initial data for bringing up a secondary CPU.
- * @stack - sp for the secondary CPU
* @status - Result passed back from the secondary CPU to
* indicate failure.
*/
struct secondary_data {
- void *stack;
struct task_struct *task;
long status;
};
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c
index 0cb34ccb6e73..4a5e204c33af 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c
@@ -99,7 +99,6 @@ int main(void)
DEFINE(SOFTIRQ_SHIFT, SOFTIRQ_SHIFT);
DEFINE(IRQ_CPUSTAT_SOFTIRQ_PENDING, offsetof(irq_cpustat_t, __softirq_pending));
BLANK();
- DEFINE(CPU_BOOT_STACK, offsetof(struct secondary_data, stack));
DEFINE(CPU_BOOT_TASK, offsetof(struct secondary_data, task));
BLANK();
DEFINE(FTR_OVR_VAL_OFFSET, offsetof(struct arm64_ftr_override, val));
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/head.S b/arch/arm64/kernel/head.S
index cc2d45d54838..9be95e11367d 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/head.S
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/head.S
@@ -645,11 +645,12 @@ SYM_FUNC_START_LOCAL(__secondary_switched)
isb
adr_l x0, secondary_data
- ldr x1, [x0, #CPU_BOOT_STACK] // get secondary_data.stack
- cbz x1, __secondary_too_slow
- mov sp, x1
ldr x2, [x0, #CPU_BOOT_TASK]
cbz x2, __secondary_too_slow
+
+ ldr x1, [x2, #TSK_STACK]
+ add sp, x1, #THREAD_SIZE
+
msr sp_el0, x2
scs_load x2, x3
setup_final_frame
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
index 92e83e8bac94..73625cc39574 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
@@ -120,7 +120,6 @@ int __cpu_up(unsigned int cpu, struct task_struct *idle)
* page tables.
*/
secondary_data.task = idle;
- secondary_data.stack = task_stack_page(idle) + THREAD_SIZE;
update_cpu_boot_status(CPU_MMU_OFF);
/* Now bring the CPU into our world */
@@ -141,7 +140,6 @@ int __cpu_up(unsigned int cpu, struct task_struct *idle)
pr_crit("CPU%u: failed to come online\n", cpu);
secondary_data.task = NULL;
- secondary_data.stack = NULL;
status = READ_ONCE(secondary_data.status);
if (status == CPU_MMU_OFF)
status = READ_ONCE(__early_cpu_boot_status);
--
2.11.0
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-20 11:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-20 11:50 [PATCH 0/6] arm64: boot cleanups Mark Rutland
2021-05-20 11:50 ` [PATCH 1/6] arm64: Implement stack trace termination record Mark Rutland
2021-05-20 11:50 ` [PATCH 2/6] arm64: assembler: add set_this_cpu_offset Mark Rutland
2021-05-20 11:50 ` [PATCH 3/6] arm64: smp: remove pointless secondary_data maintenance Mark Rutland
2021-05-20 11:50 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2021-05-20 11:50 ` [PATCH 5/6] arm64: smp: unify task and sp setup Mark Rutland
2021-05-20 11:50 ` [PATCH 6/6] arm64: smp: initialize cpu offset earlier Mark Rutland
2021-05-20 14:46 ` [PATCH 0/6] arm64: boot cleanups Ard Biesheuvel
2021-05-26 22:16 ` Will Deacon
2021-05-27 9:33 ` Mark Rutland
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210520115031.18509-5-mark.rutland@arm.com \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=madvenka@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.