On Sun, May 09, 2021 at 08:54:36PM -0500, Samuel Holland wrote: > On 5/7/21 3:09 AM, Maxime Ripard wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 10:58:59PM -0500, Samuel Holland wrote: > >> From: Arnaud Ferraris > >> > >> Add the "PinePhone" name to the sound card: this will make > >> upstreaming an ALSA UCM config easier as we can use a unique name. > >> > >> It also avoids an issue where the default card name is truncated. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Arnaud Ferraris > >> [Samuel: Split out change, updated commit message] > >> Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland > >> --- > >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64-pinephone.dtsi | 1 + > >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > >> > >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64-pinephone.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64-pinephone.dtsi > >> index 51cbfdc12936..02712f85f6bd 100644 > >> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64-pinephone.dtsi g> >> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64-pinephone.dtsi > >> @@ -433,6 +433,7 @@ ®_rtc_ldo { > >> > >> &sound { > >> status = "okay"; > >> + simple-audio-card,name = "PinePhone"; > >> simple-audio-card,aux-devs = <&codec_analog>, <&speaker_amp>; > >> simple-audio-card,widgets = "Microphone", "Headset Microphone", > >> "Microphone", "Internal Microphone", > > > > Isn't that reported to the userspace? I'm not sure we can just change it > > without breaking it. > > Yes, this is seen by userspace. > > Ideally, we would add this property with a unique value when enabling > audio for any board, but as you mention, it would be a breaking change > to add those properties now. > > In practice, all distributions supporting the PinePhone are already > carrying this patch, because the ALSA setup needed for the PinePhone is > very different from most other boards. So it would be similarly breaking > for them (and their users) to drop this patch. Ack :) Since no one else complained, I merged this patch too Thanks! Maxime