From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-19.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0BCCC04FF3 for ; Mon, 24 May 2021 15:44:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1B986197C for ; Mon, 24 May 2021 15:44:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233427AbhEXPqH (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 May 2021 11:46:07 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:57772 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234248AbhEXPl6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 May 2021 11:41:58 -0400 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BA9C861456; Mon, 24 May 2021 15:34:43 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1621870484; bh=dvRhylMM555JA8EOpyrJQdp6quiVFeZiBnuhqqBa5fY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=TE/AqwgwjfJmXucgHHo4Httc6aZAjKxS/BlSyna4ikhowm6+RUm8Ny2pNHyMqpctt aSmjf8mhTRGgfk852BcqQbjjdIkI6WKBuHMKeP9Mbw/juO8Qe0T1dtpwmfdEqycsKo o6/aarsO/pUZJzqEZyXpzadBVdgsCfL/R/+ziH6E= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Oleg Nesterov , Simon Marchi , "Eric W. Biederman" , Pedro Alves , Jan Kratochvil , Linus Torvalds , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 4.19 07/49] ptrace: make ptrace() fail if the tracee changed its pid unexpectedly Date: Mon, 24 May 2021 17:25:18 +0200 Message-Id: <20210524152324.620321932@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.31.1 In-Reply-To: <20210524152324.382084875@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20210524152324.382084875@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.66 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Oleg Nesterov [ Upstream commit dbb5afad100a828c97e012c6106566d99f041db6 ] Suppose we have 2 threads, the group-leader L and a sub-theread T, both parked in ptrace_stop(). Debugger tries to resume both threads and does ptrace(PTRACE_CONT, T); ptrace(PTRACE_CONT, L); If the sub-thread T execs in between, the 2nd PTRACE_CONT doesn not resume the old leader L, it resumes the post-exec thread T which was actually now stopped in PTHREAD_EVENT_EXEC. In this case the PTHREAD_EVENT_EXEC event is lost, and the tracer can't know that the tracee changed its pid. This patch makes ptrace() fail in this case until debugger does wait() and consumes PTHREAD_EVENT_EXEC which reports old_pid. This affects all ptrace requests except the "asynchronous" PTRACE_INTERRUPT/KILL. The patch doesn't add the new PTRACE_ option to not complicate the API, and I _hope_ this won't cause any noticeable regression: - If debugger uses PTRACE_O_TRACEEXEC and the thread did an exec and the tracer does a ptrace request without having consumed the exec event, it's 100% sure that the thread the ptracer thinks it is targeting does not exist anymore, or isn't the same as the one it thinks it is targeting. - To some degree this patch adds nothing new. In the scenario above ptrace(L) can fail with -ESRCH if it is called after the execing sub-thread wakes the leader up and before it "steals" the leader's pid. Test-case: #include #include #include #include #include #include #include #include void *tf(void *arg) { execve("/usr/bin/true", NULL, NULL); assert(0); return NULL; } int main(void) { int leader = fork(); if (!leader) { kill(getpid(), SIGSTOP); pthread_t th; pthread_create(&th, NULL, tf, NULL); for (;;) pause(); return 0; } waitpid(leader, NULL, WSTOPPED); ptrace(PTRACE_SEIZE, leader, 0, PTRACE_O_TRACECLONE | PTRACE_O_TRACEEXEC); waitpid(leader, NULL, 0); ptrace(PTRACE_CONT, leader, 0,0); waitpid(leader, NULL, 0); int status, thread = waitpid(-1, &status, 0); assert(thread > 0 && thread != leader); assert(status == 0x80137f); ptrace(PTRACE_CONT, thread, 0,0); /* * waitid() because waitpid(leader, &status, WNOWAIT) does not * report status. Why ???? * * Why WEXITED? because we have another kernel problem connected * to mt-exec. */ siginfo_t info; assert(waitid(P_PID, leader, &info, WSTOPPED|WEXITED|WNOWAIT) == 0); assert(info.si_pid == leader && info.si_status == 0x0405); /* OK, it sleeps in ptrace(PTRACE_EVENT_EXEC == 0x04) */ assert(ptrace(PTRACE_CONT, leader, 0,0) == -1); assert(errno == ESRCH); assert(leader == waitpid(leader, &status, WNOHANG)); assert(status == 0x04057f); assert(ptrace(PTRACE_CONT, leader, 0,0) == 0); return 0; } Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov Reported-by: Simon Marchi Acked-by: "Eric W. Biederman" Acked-by: Pedro Alves Acked-by: Simon Marchi Acked-by: Jan Kratochvil Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- kernel/ptrace.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/kernel/ptrace.c b/kernel/ptrace.c index ecdb7402072f..af74e843221b 100644 --- a/kernel/ptrace.c +++ b/kernel/ptrace.c @@ -163,6 +163,21 @@ void __ptrace_unlink(struct task_struct *child) spin_unlock(&child->sighand->siglock); } +static bool looks_like_a_spurious_pid(struct task_struct *task) +{ + if (task->exit_code != ((PTRACE_EVENT_EXEC << 8) | SIGTRAP)) + return false; + + if (task_pid_vnr(task) == task->ptrace_message) + return false; + /* + * The tracee changed its pid but the PTRACE_EVENT_EXEC event + * was not wait()'ed, most probably debugger targets the old + * leader which was destroyed in de_thread(). + */ + return true; +} + /* Ensure that nothing can wake it up, even SIGKILL */ static bool ptrace_freeze_traced(struct task_struct *task) { @@ -173,7 +188,8 @@ static bool ptrace_freeze_traced(struct task_struct *task) return ret; spin_lock_irq(&task->sighand->siglock); - if (task_is_traced(task) && !__fatal_signal_pending(task)) { + if (task_is_traced(task) && !looks_like_a_spurious_pid(task) && + !__fatal_signal_pending(task)) { task->state = __TASK_TRACED; ret = true; } -- 2.30.2