From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BF2BC47082 for ; Mon, 31 May 2021 08:15:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63A106102A for ; Mon, 31 May 2021 08:15:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230070AbhEaIRh (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 May 2021 04:17:37 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:50812 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229640AbhEaIRh (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 May 2021 04:17:37 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EDEB6D; Mon, 31 May 2021 01:15:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bogus (unknown [10.57.72.241]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1EAB63F73D; Mon, 31 May 2021 01:15:53 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 31 May 2021 09:15:48 +0100 From: Sudeep Holla To: Rob Herring Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Cristian Marussi , Kevin Hilman , Neil Armstrong , Jerome Brunet Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scpi: Move arm,scpi-shmem to json schema Message-ID: <20210531081548.jxovuqattu2fg73o@bogus> References: <20210526182807.548118-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com> <20210526182807.548118-2-sudeep.holla@arm.com> <20210527202554.GA1351447@robh.at.kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210527202554.GA1351447@robh.at.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 03:25:54PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 07:28:00PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote: > > Move the SRAM and shared memory binding for SCPI into the existing > > Generic on-chip SRAM. We just need to update the compatible list and > > there-by remove the whole old text format binding for the same. > > > > Cc: Rob Herring > > Cc: Kevin Hilman > > Cc: Neil Armstrong > > Cc: Jerome Brunet > > Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla > > --- > > .../devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scpi.txt | 15 --------------- > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sram/sram.yaml | 1 + > > 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 15 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scpi.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scpi.txt > > index bcd6c3ec471e..bcb8b3d61e68 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scpi.txt > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scpi.txt > > @@ -56,21 +56,6 @@ Sub-nodes > > node. It can be non linear and hence provide the mapping of identifiers > > into the clock-output-names array. > > > > -SRAM and Shared Memory for SCPI > > -------------------------------- > > - > > -A small area of SRAM is reserved for SCPI communication between application > > -processors and SCP. > > - > > -The properties should follow the generic mmio-sram description found in [3] > > - > > -Each sub-node represents the reserved area for SCPI. > > - > > -Required sub-node properties: > > -- reg : The base offset and size of the reserved area with the SRAM > > -- compatible : should be "arm,scp-shmem" for Non-secure SRAM based > > > + - arm,scpi-shmem > > Which is correct? There's not a single other occurrance in the kernel > tree of either. > Right I was thinking removing it but wasn't sure if any downstream DTS have used this as it has been in the binding for a while now. -- Regards, Sudeep From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B99C9C47094 for ; Mon, 31 May 2021 08:17:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8166C610C8 for ; Mon, 31 May 2021 08:17:32 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 8166C610C8 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=xow2wx3tjnwGA6CZvzzRYALhplZTsLdc7w/3P3zvqnE=; b=fJlesGA19O44Ps fpX4mM516NmULz2KaxvcDkw+h3SuzBxosUvScyYOg07JzovqfhomzbeIRarQwH0B0fAuz1eMHHB4J XKDFfRxiOP7ydaoVYyZpzjU/2o4wGD4Kp2dQZjwb5lyc/6zwQhaqP50zcBUU7t/MXFR4D+/L3rvyq f8B2Jw5dV149QAdXdtibqaehC+KgzMh0oAqD6LfZ99xfmQiQCsOBbPKPKjE45QzqV+8B5VHpHu9hi 1JhkYiBxx1F3WpxSir+iPrUYKpHAUiCAoF4la0t8kNRDPSKfAbcR8UrYiILBnerbyppQn7NBkP7R8 ve8i3CzW9L8lFGfXjRiQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1lnd5h-00BMu8-L7; Mon, 31 May 2021 08:16:05 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1lnd5c-00BMs8-UC for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 31 May 2021 08:16:02 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EDEB6D; Mon, 31 May 2021 01:15:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bogus (unknown [10.57.72.241]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1EAB63F73D; Mon, 31 May 2021 01:15:53 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 31 May 2021 09:15:48 +0100 From: Sudeep Holla To: Rob Herring Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Cristian Marussi , Kevin Hilman , Neil Armstrong , Jerome Brunet Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] dt-bindings: firmware: arm, scpi: Move arm, scpi-shmem to json schema Message-ID: <20210531081548.jxovuqattu2fg73o@bogus> References: <20210526182807.548118-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com> <20210526182807.548118-2-sudeep.holla@arm.com> <20210527202554.GA1351447@robh.at.kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210527202554.GA1351447@robh.at.kernel.org> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20210531_011601_065359_63602B34 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 21.90 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 03:25:54PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 07:28:00PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote: > > Move the SRAM and shared memory binding for SCPI into the existing > > Generic on-chip SRAM. We just need to update the compatible list and > > there-by remove the whole old text format binding for the same. > > > > Cc: Rob Herring > > Cc: Kevin Hilman > > Cc: Neil Armstrong > > Cc: Jerome Brunet > > Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla > > --- > > .../devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scpi.txt | 15 --------------- > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sram/sram.yaml | 1 + > > 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 15 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scpi.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scpi.txt > > index bcd6c3ec471e..bcb8b3d61e68 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scpi.txt > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scpi.txt > > @@ -56,21 +56,6 @@ Sub-nodes > > node. It can be non linear and hence provide the mapping of identifiers > > into the clock-output-names array. > > > > -SRAM and Shared Memory for SCPI > > -------------------------------- > > - > > -A small area of SRAM is reserved for SCPI communication between application > > -processors and SCP. > > - > > -The properties should follow the generic mmio-sram description found in [3] > > - > > -Each sub-node represents the reserved area for SCPI. > > - > > -Required sub-node properties: > > -- reg : The base offset and size of the reserved area with the SRAM > > -- compatible : should be "arm,scp-shmem" for Non-secure SRAM based > > > + - arm,scpi-shmem > > Which is correct? There's not a single other occurrance in the kernel > tree of either. > Right I was thinking removing it but wasn't sure if any downstream DTS have used this as it has been in the binding for a while now. -- Regards, Sudeep _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel