From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@codeaurora.org>,
Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
DTML <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>,
Roja Rani Yarubandi <rojay@codeaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: power: Introduce 'assigned-performance-states' property
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2021 16:24:59 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210602105459.t3ptci42lgvrzqlx@vireshk-i7> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPDyKFqmBoMwQkWHT-w8A2=PeXeDgxE8n=D4prdEyuxM+ZOAaA@mail.gmail.com>
On 02-06-21, 12:45, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> Alright, so it looks like we already have the DT binding that we need for this.
>
> That leaves us with the question, at what place should we parse it
> (call of_get_required_opp_performance_state()) and set the performance
> state for the device?
>
> Does it still make sense to do it while attaching the device to the
> genpd, you think?
For parsing, yes this is the right place. For getting that into
effect, whenever the device is supposed to work, i.e. with runtime PM
somehow.
--
viresh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-02 10:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-27 6:12 [PATCH v2 0/3] PM / Domains: Add support for assigned-performance-states Rajendra Nayak
2021-05-27 6:12 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: power: Introduce 'assigned-performance-states' property Rajendra Nayak
2021-05-27 6:16 ` Viresh Kumar
2021-05-27 6:21 ` Rajendra Nayak
2021-05-27 14:23 ` Rob Herring
2021-05-27 14:26 ` Rob Herring
2021-06-01 10:33 ` Ulf Hansson
2021-06-01 11:12 ` Stephan Gerhold
2021-06-01 11:44 ` Viresh Kumar
2021-06-02 10:45 ` Ulf Hansson
2021-06-02 10:54 ` Viresh Kumar [this message]
2021-06-02 12:50 ` Ulf Hansson
2021-06-15 15:05 ` Ulf Hansson
2021-06-18 6:01 ` Rajendra Nayak
2021-05-27 6:12 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] PM / Domains: Add support for 'assigned-performance-states' Rajendra Nayak
2021-05-27 6:12 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] arm64: dts: sc7180: Add assigned-performance-states for i2c Rajendra Nayak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210602105459.t3ptci42lgvrzqlx@vireshk-i7 \
--to=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rnayak@codeaurora.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=rojay@codeaurora.org \
--cc=stephan@gerhold.net \
--cc=swboyd@chromium.org \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.