From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55B8CC47083 for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2021 17:49:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B95D61D7D for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2021 17:49:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230142AbhFBRvM (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Jun 2021 13:51:12 -0400 Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de ([195.135.220.29]:42252 "EHLO smtp-out2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229764AbhFBRvJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Jun 2021 13:51:09 -0400 Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [149.44.160.134]) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id A20B81FD30; Wed, 2 Jun 2021 17:49:25 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1622656165; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=qmghgJj5TOxWt7oAk6tmXYL4c5FHoFn9dS2PGd6Sm68=; b=BECU3UIPup7ss7EN/YzMrGSoFKSXeyXjgLZfXkhcuDELJFXxwjJOTW6XjxFvfU5TJaQB8q LBYLjTflRJvB56aqG361Cw5d8XoNS+TsGyI5afPblZBTCELpFqkAzCC0SWZvEL3hLlfpqR jhKImhEAmIjnLfkabkq7d1RX0xsCPCk= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1622656165; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=qmghgJj5TOxWt7oAk6tmXYL4c5FHoFn9dS2PGd6Sm68=; b=5REC4EMDCXldfnOiU+UWSQLNXaiNP+o+Qdlzw+cvH2CffoiHZx5Fh+x0BenvJddt3gJB8w WuZxJ23g6xYYpBBA== Received: from ds.suse.cz (ds.suse.cz [10.100.12.205]) by relay2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99399A3B84; Wed, 2 Jun 2021 17:49:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ds.suse.cz (Postfix, from userid 10065) id 440F7DA8A7; Wed, 2 Jun 2021 19:39:50 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2021 19:39:49 +0200 From: David Sterba To: riteshh Cc: Qu Wenruo , linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, David Sterba Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/30] btrfs: add data write support for subpage Message-ID: <20210602173949.GS31483@twin.jikos.cz> Reply-To: dsterba@suse.cz Mail-Followup-To: dsterba@suse.cz, riteshh , Qu Wenruo , linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, David Sterba References: <20210531085106.259490-1-wqu@suse.com> <20210602022239.7ueomwrumsbbc5wu@riteshh-domain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210602022239.7ueomwrumsbbc5wu@riteshh-domain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23.1-rc1 (2014-03-12) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 07:52:39AM +0530, riteshh wrote: > I have completed another 2 full iterations of testing this v4 with "-g all" on > Power. There are no failures reported (other than the known ones mostly due to > defrag disabled) and no kernel warnings/errors reported with v4 of your patch > series (other than a known one causing transaction abort -28 msg, but that seems > to be triggering even w/o your patch series i.e. with 64k blocksize too). > > >From the test perspective, please feel free to add below for your v4. > > Tested-by: Ritesh Harjani [ppc64] Thank you very much for testing, I've added the tag to the series.