From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E50CFC4743E for ; Sat, 5 Jun 2021 16:13:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA0D3613F7 for ; Sat, 5 Jun 2021 16:13:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230085AbhFEQPH (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Jun 2021 12:15:07 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:56546 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229930AbhFEQPG (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Jun 2021 12:15:06 -0400 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 415F261107; Sat, 5 Jun 2021 16:13:17 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1622909598; bh=SA5TEU+2VLG56VJsWiXFfbq1+IATGpk0WcRtynKouYQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=h8je3nNfdPMWLaSstwksH2HUFfv92PhNait5QX6wGaW6wJu2PYnONmGWNPvewgMMx m2coc7Ajx5QYNAsd5PcE29AshjLvujwf98ajO97ibsGlQQgt/IPk27C7jmA6y1YDjo v43xIsTn2ZMs7T/EvAj/7enc6bO/84cIzevLaAN8fCaUxru1ZIV5LLK3VvKHLvb7P/ nKgHGI9mndrTluywCQaCpxcoY9SgrLknMuxrB8GJe+dmm+UXEAkcvus0sObF79ELu1 SMI1GCWHejulJjZttGbpzs0xfiuw5cPmllOOhs88CWLQPpG+GeerS6zMVTsnxbZFGx PylZk6V8d1e6w== Date: Sat, 5 Jun 2021 18:13:14 +0200 From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab To: David Gow Cc: Jonathan Corbet , Linux Doc Mailing List , Daniel Latypov , Marco Elver , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/34] docs: dev-tools: testing-overview.rst: avoid using ReSt :doc:`foo` markup Message-ID: <20210605181314.1e76f10d@coco.lan> In-Reply-To: References: <63fe86c8de5cced00a1bb5d18d6c7f087268565a.1622898327.git.mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.8 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Em Sat, 5 Jun 2021 23:43:55 +0800 David Gow escreveu: > On Sat, Jun 5, 2021 at 9:18 PM Mauro Carvalho Chehab > wrote: > > > > The :doc:`foo` tag is auto-generated via automarkup.py. > > So, use the filename at the sources, instead of :doc:`foo`. > > > > Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab > > --- > > Hmm... I'd originally wanted this to read more like the name of the > tool than the path to the doc file, but given the :doc: prefix and > backticks are equally ugly, and no less confusing to the plain-text > reader than the filename, I'm happy to have this changed. Particularly > if we're standardising on this across the kernel documentation. Yeah, the idea is to avoid :doc: treewide, at least for simple cases. I'm proposing that we should still keep using: :doc:`some description ` for named references, which is still ugly in plain-text, but can be used to provide a better hyperlink when the docs are converted into html/LaTeX/pdf, as it would be converted (in html) as: some description > Reviewed-by: David Gow Thanks! Mauro > > > -- David > > > Documentation/dev-tools/testing-overview.rst | 16 ++++++++-------- > > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/testing-overview.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/testing-overview.rst > > index b5b46709969c..65feb81edb14 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/dev-tools/testing-overview.rst > > +++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/testing-overview.rst > > @@ -71,15 +71,15 @@ can be used to verify that a test is executing particular functions or lines > > of code. This is useful for determining how much of the kernel is being tested, > > and for finding corner-cases which are not covered by the appropriate test. > > > > -:doc:`gcov` is GCC's coverage testing tool, which can be used with the kernel > > -to get global or per-module coverage. Unlike KCOV, it does not record per-task > > -coverage. Coverage data can be read from debugfs, and interpreted using the > > -usual gcov tooling. > > +Documentation/dev-tools/gcov.rst is GCC's coverage testing tool, which can be > > +used with the kernel to get global or per-module coverage. Unlike KCOV, it > > +does not record per-task coverage. Coverage data can be read from debugfs, > > +and interpreted using the usual gcov tooling. > > > > -:doc:`kcov` is a feature which can be built in to the kernel to allow > > -capturing coverage on a per-task level. It's therefore useful for fuzzing and > > -other situations where information about code executed during, for example, a > > -single syscall is useful. > > +Documentation/dev-tools/kcov.rst is a feature which can be built in to the > > +kernel to allow capturing coverage on a per-task level. It's therefore useful > > +for fuzzing and other situations where information about code executed during, > > +for example, a single syscall is useful. > > > > > > Dynamic Analysis Tools > > -- > > 2.31.1 > > Thanks, Mauro