From: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Flavio Suligoi <f.suligoi@asem.it>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] pwm: core: Always require PWM flags to be provided
Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2021 23:30:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210606213054.bmqgs5hehbowa62d@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210531194947.10770-2-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 692 bytes --]
Hello Andy,
On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 10:49:42PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> It makes little sense to make PWM flags optional since in case
> of multi-channel consumer the flags can be optional only for
> the last listed channel.
I think the same holds true for dt references.
> Thus always require PWM flags to be provided.
I'm not sure I want to follow that conclusion. Most consumers only need
a single PWM and then not providing flags is fine, isn't it? Or does
this change fix an error?
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-06 21:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-31 19:49 [PATCH v2 1/7] docs: firmware-guide: ACPI: Add a PWM example Andy Shevchenko
2021-05-31 19:49 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] pwm: core: Always require PWM flags to be provided Andy Shevchenko
2021-06-06 21:30 ` Uwe Kleine-König [this message]
2021-06-07 9:02 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-06-07 9:53 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2021-06-07 10:15 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-06-07 10:21 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-06-07 11:49 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-06-07 14:11 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2021-05-31 19:49 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] pwm: core: Convert to use fwnode for matching Andy Shevchenko
2021-05-31 19:49 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] pwm: core: Reuse fwnode_to_pwmchip() in ACPI case Andy Shevchenko
2021-05-31 19:49 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] pwm: core: Unify fwnode checks in the module Andy Shevchenko
2021-05-31 19:49 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] pwm: core: Remove unused devm_pwm_put() Andy Shevchenko
2021-06-06 21:40 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2021-05-31 19:49 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] pwm: core: Simplify some devm_*pwm*() functions Andy Shevchenko
2021-06-06 21:45 ` Uwe Kleine-König
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210606213054.bmqgs5hehbowa62d@pengutronix.de \
--to=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=f.suligoi@asem.it \
--cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.