All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
	Keith Busch <keith.busch@wdc.com>,
	linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv5] nvme: allow to re-attach namespaces after all paths are down
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2021 18:42:47 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210608164247.GA12430@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210607133435.138525-1-hare@suse.de>

While I do like the look, I don't see how this could actually work:

>  	} else {
>  		ret = -EINVAL;
> -		if (!is_shared || !head->shared) {
> +		/*
> +		 * If multipath is enabled we might hit an ns head with no
> +		 * paths, but that doesn't indicate it's a shared namespace.
> +		 */
> +		if (!list_empty(&head->list) && (!is_shared || !head->shared)) {
>  			dev_err(ctrl->device,
>  				"Duplicate unshared namespace %d\n", nsid);
>  			goto out_put_ns_head;

When we get here with an existing ns_head with no namespaces attached
to it, we can assume it once had namespaces attached to it.  Because
of that NVME_NSHEAD_DISK_LIVE will be set, and we'll never add the
disk for it again.  Even if we did add the disk again what prevents
adding a disk and removing one from racing with each other?

_______________________________________________
Linux-nvme mailing list
Linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvme

  reply	other threads:[~2021-06-08 16:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-07 13:34 [PATCHv5] nvme: allow to re-attach namespaces after all paths are down Hannes Reinecke
2021-06-08 16:42 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2021-06-08 17:44   ` Hannes Reinecke

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210608164247.GA12430@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=keith.busch@wdc.com \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.