From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>, Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>, Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>, Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>, Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>, Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>, Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>, Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>, kernel-team@android.com Subject: [PATCH v9 16/20] arm64: Prevent offlining first CPU with 32-bit EL0 on mismatched system Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2021 19:03:09 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20210608180313.11502-17-will@kernel.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20210608180313.11502-1-will@kernel.org> If we want to support 32-bit applications, then when we identify a CPU with mismatched 32-bit EL0 support we must ensure that we will always have an active 32-bit CPU available to us from then on. This is important for the scheduler, because is_cpu_allowed() will be constrained to 32-bit CPUs for compat tasks and forced migration due to a hotplug event will hang if no 32-bit CPUs are available. On detecting a mismatch, prevent offlining of either the mismatching CPU if it is 32-bit capable, or find the first active 32-bit capable CPU otherwise. Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> --- arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c index d735dd13167b..55a58933e3b2 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c @@ -2877,15 +2877,38 @@ void __init setup_cpu_features(void) static int enable_mismatched_32bit_el0(unsigned int cpu) { + /* + * The first 32-bit-capable CPU we detected and so can no longer + * be offlined by userspace. -1 indicates we haven't yet onlined + * a 32-bit-capable CPU. + */ + static int lucky_winner = -1; + struct cpuinfo_arm64 *info = &per_cpu(cpu_data, cpu); bool cpu_32bit = id_aa64pfr0_32bit_el0(info->reg_id_aa64pfr0); if (cpu_32bit) { cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, cpu_32bit_el0_mask); static_branch_enable_cpuslocked(&arm64_mismatched_32bit_el0); - setup_elf_hwcaps(compat_elf_hwcaps); } + if (cpumask_test_cpu(0, cpu_32bit_el0_mask) == cpu_32bit) + return 0; + + if (lucky_winner >= 0) + return 0; + + /* + * We've detected a mismatch. We need to keep one of our CPUs with + * 32-bit EL0 online so that is_cpu_allowed() doesn't end up rejecting + * every CPU in the system for a 32-bit task. + */ + lucky_winner = cpu_32bit ? cpu : cpumask_any_and(cpu_32bit_el0_mask, + cpu_active_mask); + get_cpu_device(lucky_winner)->offline_disabled = true; + setup_elf_hwcaps(compat_elf_hwcaps); + pr_info("Asymmetric 32-bit EL0 support detected on CPU %u; CPU hot-unplug disabled on CPU %u\n", + cpu, lucky_winner); return 0; } -- 2.32.0.rc1.229.g3e70b5a671-goog
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID
From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>, Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>, Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>, Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>, Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>, Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>, Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>, Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>, kernel-team@android.com Subject: [PATCH v9 16/20] arm64: Prevent offlining first CPU with 32-bit EL0 on mismatched system Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2021 19:03:09 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20210608180313.11502-17-will@kernel.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20210608180313.11502-1-will@kernel.org> If we want to support 32-bit applications, then when we identify a CPU with mismatched 32-bit EL0 support we must ensure that we will always have an active 32-bit CPU available to us from then on. This is important for the scheduler, because is_cpu_allowed() will be constrained to 32-bit CPUs for compat tasks and forced migration due to a hotplug event will hang if no 32-bit CPUs are available. On detecting a mismatch, prevent offlining of either the mismatching CPU if it is 32-bit capable, or find the first active 32-bit capable CPU otherwise. Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> --- arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c index d735dd13167b..55a58933e3b2 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c @@ -2877,15 +2877,38 @@ void __init setup_cpu_features(void) static int enable_mismatched_32bit_el0(unsigned int cpu) { + /* + * The first 32-bit-capable CPU we detected and so can no longer + * be offlined by userspace. -1 indicates we haven't yet onlined + * a 32-bit-capable CPU. + */ + static int lucky_winner = -1; + struct cpuinfo_arm64 *info = &per_cpu(cpu_data, cpu); bool cpu_32bit = id_aa64pfr0_32bit_el0(info->reg_id_aa64pfr0); if (cpu_32bit) { cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, cpu_32bit_el0_mask); static_branch_enable_cpuslocked(&arm64_mismatched_32bit_el0); - setup_elf_hwcaps(compat_elf_hwcaps); } + if (cpumask_test_cpu(0, cpu_32bit_el0_mask) == cpu_32bit) + return 0; + + if (lucky_winner >= 0) + return 0; + + /* + * We've detected a mismatch. We need to keep one of our CPUs with + * 32-bit EL0 online so that is_cpu_allowed() doesn't end up rejecting + * every CPU in the system for a 32-bit task. + */ + lucky_winner = cpu_32bit ? cpu : cpumask_any_and(cpu_32bit_el0_mask, + cpu_active_mask); + get_cpu_device(lucky_winner)->offline_disabled = true; + setup_elf_hwcaps(compat_elf_hwcaps); + pr_info("Asymmetric 32-bit EL0 support detected on CPU %u; CPU hot-unplug disabled on CPU %u\n", + cpu, lucky_winner); return 0; } -- 2.32.0.rc1.229.g3e70b5a671-goog _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-08 18:04 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-06-08 18:02 [PATCH v9 00/20] Add support for 32-bit tasks on asymmetric AArch32 systems Will Deacon 2021-06-08 18:02 ` Will Deacon 2021-06-08 18:02 ` [PATCH v9 01/20] arm64: cpuinfo: Split AArch32 registers out into a separate struct Will Deacon 2021-06-08 18:02 ` Will Deacon 2021-06-08 18:02 ` [PATCH v9 02/20] arm64: Allow mismatched 32-bit EL0 support Will Deacon 2021-06-08 18:02 ` Will Deacon 2021-06-08 18:02 ` [PATCH v9 03/20] KVM: arm64: Kill 32-bit vCPUs on systems with mismatched " Will Deacon 2021-06-08 18:02 ` Will Deacon 2021-06-08 18:02 ` [PATCH v9 04/20] arm64: Kill 32-bit applications scheduled on 64-bit-only CPUs Will Deacon 2021-06-08 18:02 ` Will Deacon 2021-06-08 18:02 ` [PATCH v9 05/20] sched: Introduce task_cpu_possible_mask() to limit fallback rq selection Will Deacon 2021-06-08 18:02 ` Will Deacon 2021-06-08 18:02 ` [PATCH v9 06/20] cpuset: Don't use the cpu_possible_mask as a last resort for cgroup v1 Will Deacon 2021-06-08 18:02 ` Will Deacon 2021-06-10 12:59 ` Valentin Schneider 2021-06-10 12:59 ` Valentin Schneider 2021-06-08 18:03 ` [PATCH v9 07/20] cpuset: Honour task_cpu_possible_mask() in guarantee_online_cpus() Will Deacon 2021-06-08 18:03 ` Will Deacon 2021-06-08 18:03 ` [PATCH v9 08/20] cpuset: Cleanup cpuset_cpus_allowed_fallback() use in select_fallback_rq() Will Deacon 2021-06-08 18:03 ` Will Deacon 2021-06-10 12:59 ` Valentin Schneider 2021-06-10 12:59 ` Valentin Schneider 2021-06-08 18:03 ` [PATCH v9 09/20] sched: Reject CPU affinity changes based on task_cpu_possible_mask() Will Deacon 2021-06-08 18:03 ` Will Deacon 2021-06-08 18:03 ` [PATCH v9 10/20] sched: Introduce task_struct::user_cpus_ptr to track requested affinity Will Deacon 2021-06-08 18:03 ` Will Deacon 2021-06-08 18:03 ` [PATCH v9 11/20] sched: Split the guts of sched_setaffinity() into a helper function Will Deacon 2021-06-08 18:03 ` Will Deacon 2021-06-08 18:03 ` [PATCH v9 12/20] sched: Allow task CPU affinity to be restricted on asymmetric systems Will Deacon 2021-06-08 18:03 ` Will Deacon 2021-06-10 13:00 ` Valentin Schneider 2021-06-10 13:00 ` Valentin Schneider 2021-06-08 18:03 ` [PATCH v9 13/20] sched: Introduce dl_task_check_affinity() to check proposed affinity Will Deacon 2021-06-08 18:03 ` Will Deacon 2021-06-08 18:03 ` [PATCH v9 14/20] arm64: Implement task_cpu_possible_mask() Will Deacon 2021-06-08 18:03 ` Will Deacon 2021-06-08 18:03 ` [PATCH v9 15/20] arm64: exec: Adjust affinity for compat tasks with mismatched 32-bit EL0 Will Deacon 2021-06-08 18:03 ` Will Deacon 2021-06-08 18:03 ` Will Deacon [this message] 2021-06-08 18:03 ` [PATCH v9 16/20] arm64: Prevent offlining first CPU with 32-bit EL0 on mismatched system Will Deacon 2021-06-08 18:03 ` [PATCH v9 17/20] arm64: Advertise CPUs capable of running 32-bit applications in sysfs Will Deacon 2021-06-08 18:03 ` Will Deacon 2021-06-08 18:03 ` [PATCH v9 18/20] arm64: Hook up cmdline parameter to allow mismatched 32-bit EL0 Will Deacon 2021-06-08 18:03 ` Will Deacon 2021-06-08 18:03 ` [PATCH v9 19/20] arm64: Remove logic to kill 32-bit tasks on 64-bit-only cores Will Deacon 2021-06-08 18:03 ` Will Deacon 2021-06-08 18:03 ` [PATCH v9 20/20] Documentation: arm64: describe asymmetric 32-bit support Will Deacon 2021-06-08 18:03 ` Will Deacon 2021-06-11 16:15 ` [PATCH v9 00/20] Add support for 32-bit tasks on asymmetric AArch32 systems Will Deacon 2021-06-11 16:15 ` Will Deacon
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20210608180313.11502-17-will@kernel.org \ --to=will@kernel.org \ --cc=bristot@redhat.com \ --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \ --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \ --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \ --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \ --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \ --cc=kernel-team@android.com \ --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \ --cc=maz@kernel.org \ --cc=mingo@redhat.com \ --cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \ --cc=peterz@infradead.org \ --cc=qais.yousef@arm.com \ --cc=qperret@google.com \ --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \ --cc=surenb@google.com \ --cc=tj@kernel.org \ --cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \ --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \ --subject='Re: [PATCH v9 16/20] arm64: Prevent offlining first CPU with 32-bit EL0 on mismatched system' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.