From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>, Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>, Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>, Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>, Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>, Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>, Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>, Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>, kernel-team@android.com Subject: [PATCH v9 02/20] arm64: Allow mismatched 32-bit EL0 support Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2021 19:02:55 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20210608180313.11502-3-will@kernel.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20210608180313.11502-1-will@kernel.org> When confronted with a mixture of CPUs, some of which support 32-bit applications and others which don't, we quite sensibly treat the system as 64-bit only for userspace and prevent execve() of 32-bit binaries. Unfortunately, some crazy folks have decided to build systems like this with the intention of running 32-bit applications, so relax our sanitisation logic to continue to advertise 32-bit support to userspace on these systems and track the real 32-bit capable cores in a cpumask instead. For now, the default behaviour remains but will be tied to a command-line option in a later patch. Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> --- arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 8 +- arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 114 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---- arch/arm64/tools/cpucaps | 3 +- 3 files changed, 110 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h index 338840c00e8e..603bf4160cd6 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h @@ -630,9 +630,15 @@ static inline bool cpu_supports_mixed_endian_el0(void) return id_aa64mmfr0_mixed_endian_el0(read_cpuid(ID_AA64MMFR0_EL1)); } +const struct cpumask *system_32bit_el0_cpumask(void); +DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(arm64_mismatched_32bit_el0); + static inline bool system_supports_32bit_el0(void) { - return cpus_have_const_cap(ARM64_HAS_32BIT_EL0); + u64 pfr0 = read_sanitised_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1); + + return static_branch_unlikely(&arm64_mismatched_32bit_el0) || + id_aa64pfr0_32bit_el0(pfr0); } static inline bool system_supports_4kb_granule(void) diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c index a4db25cd7122..d735dd13167b 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c @@ -107,6 +107,24 @@ DECLARE_BITMAP(boot_capabilities, ARM64_NPATCHABLE); bool arm64_use_ng_mappings = false; EXPORT_SYMBOL(arm64_use_ng_mappings); +/* + * Permit PER_LINUX32 and execve() of 32-bit binaries even if not all CPUs + * support it? + */ +static bool __read_mostly allow_mismatched_32bit_el0; + +/* + * Static branch enabled only if allow_mismatched_32bit_el0 is set and we have + * seen at least one CPU capable of 32-bit EL0. + */ +DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(arm64_mismatched_32bit_el0); + +/* + * Mask of CPUs supporting 32-bit EL0. + * Only valid if arm64_mismatched_32bit_el0 is enabled. + */ +static cpumask_var_t cpu_32bit_el0_mask __cpumask_var_read_mostly; + /* * Flag to indicate if we have computed the system wide * capabilities based on the boot time active CPUs. This @@ -767,7 +785,7 @@ static void __init sort_ftr_regs(void) * Any bits that are not covered by an arm64_ftr_bits entry are considered * RES0 for the system-wide value, and must strictly match. */ -static void __init init_cpu_ftr_reg(u32 sys_reg, u64 new) +static void init_cpu_ftr_reg(u32 sys_reg, u64 new) { u64 val = 0; u64 strict_mask = ~0x0ULL; @@ -863,7 +881,7 @@ static void __init init_cpu_hwcaps_indirect_list(void) static void __init setup_boot_cpu_capabilities(void); -static void __init init_32bit_cpu_features(struct cpuinfo_32bit *info) +static void init_32bit_cpu_features(struct cpuinfo_32bit *info) { init_cpu_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_DFR0_EL1, info->reg_id_dfr0); init_cpu_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_DFR1_EL1, info->reg_id_dfr1); @@ -979,6 +997,22 @@ static void relax_cpu_ftr_reg(u32 sys_id, int field) WARN_ON(!ftrp->width); } +static void lazy_init_32bit_cpu_features(struct cpuinfo_arm64 *info, + struct cpuinfo_arm64 *boot) +{ + static bool boot_cpu_32bit_regs_overridden = false; + + if (!allow_mismatched_32bit_el0 || boot_cpu_32bit_regs_overridden) + return; + + if (id_aa64pfr0_32bit_el0(boot->reg_id_aa64pfr0)) + return; + + boot->aarch32 = info->aarch32; + init_32bit_cpu_features(&boot->aarch32); + boot_cpu_32bit_regs_overridden = true; +} + static int update_32bit_cpu_features(int cpu, struct cpuinfo_32bit *info, struct cpuinfo_32bit *boot) { @@ -1139,6 +1173,7 @@ void update_cpu_features(int cpu, * (e.g. SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1), so we call it last. */ if (id_aa64pfr0_32bit_el0(info->reg_id_aa64pfr0)) { + lazy_init_32bit_cpu_features(info, boot); taint |= update_32bit_cpu_features(cpu, &info->aarch32, &boot->aarch32); } @@ -1251,6 +1286,28 @@ has_cpuid_feature(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *entry, int scope) return feature_matches(val, entry); } +const struct cpumask *system_32bit_el0_cpumask(void) +{ + if (!system_supports_32bit_el0()) + return cpu_none_mask; + + if (static_branch_unlikely(&arm64_mismatched_32bit_el0)) + return cpu_32bit_el0_mask; + + return cpu_possible_mask; +} + +static bool has_32bit_el0(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *entry, int scope) +{ + if (!has_cpuid_feature(entry, scope)) + return allow_mismatched_32bit_el0; + + if (scope == SCOPE_SYSTEM) + pr_info("detected: 32-bit EL0 Support\n"); + + return true; +} + static bool has_useable_gicv3_cpuif(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *entry, int scope) { bool has_sre; @@ -1869,10 +1926,9 @@ static const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities arm64_features[] = { .cpu_enable = cpu_copy_el2regs, }, { - .desc = "32-bit EL0 Support", - .capability = ARM64_HAS_32BIT_EL0, + .capability = ARM64_HAS_32BIT_EL0_DO_NOT_USE, .type = ARM64_CPUCAP_SYSTEM_FEATURE, - .matches = has_cpuid_feature, + .matches = has_32bit_el0, .sys_reg = SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1, .sign = FTR_UNSIGNED, .field_pos = ID_AA64PFR0_EL0_SHIFT, @@ -2381,7 +2437,7 @@ static const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities compat_elf_hwcaps[] = { {}, }; -static void __init cap_set_elf_hwcap(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *cap) +static void cap_set_elf_hwcap(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *cap) { switch (cap->hwcap_type) { case CAP_HWCAP: @@ -2426,7 +2482,7 @@ static bool cpus_have_elf_hwcap(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *cap) return rc; } -static void __init setup_elf_hwcaps(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *hwcaps) +static void setup_elf_hwcaps(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *hwcaps) { /* We support emulation of accesses to CPU ID feature registers */ cpu_set_named_feature(CPUID); @@ -2601,7 +2657,7 @@ static void check_early_cpu_features(void) } static void -verify_local_elf_hwcaps(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *caps) +__verify_local_elf_hwcaps(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *caps) { for (; caps->matches; caps++) @@ -2612,6 +2668,14 @@ verify_local_elf_hwcaps(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *caps) } } +static void verify_local_elf_hwcaps(void) +{ + __verify_local_elf_hwcaps(arm64_elf_hwcaps); + + if (id_aa64pfr0_32bit_el0(read_cpuid(ID_AA64PFR0_EL1))) + __verify_local_elf_hwcaps(compat_elf_hwcaps); +} + static void verify_sve_features(void) { u64 safe_zcr = read_sanitised_ftr_reg(SYS_ZCR_EL1); @@ -2676,11 +2740,7 @@ static void verify_local_cpu_capabilities(void) * on all secondary CPUs. */ verify_local_cpu_caps(SCOPE_ALL & ~SCOPE_BOOT_CPU); - - verify_local_elf_hwcaps(arm64_elf_hwcaps); - - if (system_supports_32bit_el0()) - verify_local_elf_hwcaps(compat_elf_hwcaps); + verify_local_elf_hwcaps(); if (system_supports_sve()) verify_sve_features(); @@ -2815,6 +2875,34 @@ void __init setup_cpu_features(void) ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN); } +static int enable_mismatched_32bit_el0(unsigned int cpu) +{ + struct cpuinfo_arm64 *info = &per_cpu(cpu_data, cpu); + bool cpu_32bit = id_aa64pfr0_32bit_el0(info->reg_id_aa64pfr0); + + if (cpu_32bit) { + cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, cpu_32bit_el0_mask); + static_branch_enable_cpuslocked(&arm64_mismatched_32bit_el0); + setup_elf_hwcaps(compat_elf_hwcaps); + } + + return 0; +} + +static int __init init_32bit_el0_mask(void) +{ + if (!allow_mismatched_32bit_el0) + return 0; + + if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&cpu_32bit_el0_mask, GFP_KERNEL)) + return -ENOMEM; + + return cpuhp_setup_state(CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_DYN, + "arm64/mismatched_32bit_el0:online", + enable_mismatched_32bit_el0, NULL); +} +subsys_initcall_sync(init_32bit_el0_mask); + static void __maybe_unused cpu_enable_cnp(struct arm64_cpu_capabilities const *cap) { cpu_replace_ttbr1(lm_alias(swapper_pg_dir)); diff --git a/arch/arm64/tools/cpucaps b/arch/arm64/tools/cpucaps index 21fbdda7086e..49305c2e6dfd 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/tools/cpucaps +++ b/arch/arm64/tools/cpucaps @@ -3,7 +3,8 @@ # Internal CPU capabilities constants, keep this list sorted BTI -HAS_32BIT_EL0 +# Unreliable: use system_supports_32bit_el0() instead. +HAS_32BIT_EL0_DO_NOT_USE HAS_32BIT_EL1 HAS_ADDRESS_AUTH HAS_ADDRESS_AUTH_ARCH -- 2.32.0.rc1.229.g3e70b5a671-goog
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID
From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>, Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>, Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>, Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>, Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>, Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>, Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>, Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>, kernel-team@android.com Subject: [PATCH v9 02/20] arm64: Allow mismatched 32-bit EL0 support Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2021 19:02:55 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20210608180313.11502-3-will@kernel.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20210608180313.11502-1-will@kernel.org> When confronted with a mixture of CPUs, some of which support 32-bit applications and others which don't, we quite sensibly treat the system as 64-bit only for userspace and prevent execve() of 32-bit binaries. Unfortunately, some crazy folks have decided to build systems like this with the intention of running 32-bit applications, so relax our sanitisation logic to continue to advertise 32-bit support to userspace on these systems and track the real 32-bit capable cores in a cpumask instead. For now, the default behaviour remains but will be tied to a command-line option in a later patch. Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> --- arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 8 +- arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 114 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---- arch/arm64/tools/cpucaps | 3 +- 3 files changed, 110 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h index 338840c00e8e..603bf4160cd6 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h @@ -630,9 +630,15 @@ static inline bool cpu_supports_mixed_endian_el0(void) return id_aa64mmfr0_mixed_endian_el0(read_cpuid(ID_AA64MMFR0_EL1)); } +const struct cpumask *system_32bit_el0_cpumask(void); +DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(arm64_mismatched_32bit_el0); + static inline bool system_supports_32bit_el0(void) { - return cpus_have_const_cap(ARM64_HAS_32BIT_EL0); + u64 pfr0 = read_sanitised_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1); + + return static_branch_unlikely(&arm64_mismatched_32bit_el0) || + id_aa64pfr0_32bit_el0(pfr0); } static inline bool system_supports_4kb_granule(void) diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c index a4db25cd7122..d735dd13167b 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c @@ -107,6 +107,24 @@ DECLARE_BITMAP(boot_capabilities, ARM64_NPATCHABLE); bool arm64_use_ng_mappings = false; EXPORT_SYMBOL(arm64_use_ng_mappings); +/* + * Permit PER_LINUX32 and execve() of 32-bit binaries even if not all CPUs + * support it? + */ +static bool __read_mostly allow_mismatched_32bit_el0; + +/* + * Static branch enabled only if allow_mismatched_32bit_el0 is set and we have + * seen at least one CPU capable of 32-bit EL0. + */ +DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(arm64_mismatched_32bit_el0); + +/* + * Mask of CPUs supporting 32-bit EL0. + * Only valid if arm64_mismatched_32bit_el0 is enabled. + */ +static cpumask_var_t cpu_32bit_el0_mask __cpumask_var_read_mostly; + /* * Flag to indicate if we have computed the system wide * capabilities based on the boot time active CPUs. This @@ -767,7 +785,7 @@ static void __init sort_ftr_regs(void) * Any bits that are not covered by an arm64_ftr_bits entry are considered * RES0 for the system-wide value, and must strictly match. */ -static void __init init_cpu_ftr_reg(u32 sys_reg, u64 new) +static void init_cpu_ftr_reg(u32 sys_reg, u64 new) { u64 val = 0; u64 strict_mask = ~0x0ULL; @@ -863,7 +881,7 @@ static void __init init_cpu_hwcaps_indirect_list(void) static void __init setup_boot_cpu_capabilities(void); -static void __init init_32bit_cpu_features(struct cpuinfo_32bit *info) +static void init_32bit_cpu_features(struct cpuinfo_32bit *info) { init_cpu_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_DFR0_EL1, info->reg_id_dfr0); init_cpu_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_DFR1_EL1, info->reg_id_dfr1); @@ -979,6 +997,22 @@ static void relax_cpu_ftr_reg(u32 sys_id, int field) WARN_ON(!ftrp->width); } +static void lazy_init_32bit_cpu_features(struct cpuinfo_arm64 *info, + struct cpuinfo_arm64 *boot) +{ + static bool boot_cpu_32bit_regs_overridden = false; + + if (!allow_mismatched_32bit_el0 || boot_cpu_32bit_regs_overridden) + return; + + if (id_aa64pfr0_32bit_el0(boot->reg_id_aa64pfr0)) + return; + + boot->aarch32 = info->aarch32; + init_32bit_cpu_features(&boot->aarch32); + boot_cpu_32bit_regs_overridden = true; +} + static int update_32bit_cpu_features(int cpu, struct cpuinfo_32bit *info, struct cpuinfo_32bit *boot) { @@ -1139,6 +1173,7 @@ void update_cpu_features(int cpu, * (e.g. SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1), so we call it last. */ if (id_aa64pfr0_32bit_el0(info->reg_id_aa64pfr0)) { + lazy_init_32bit_cpu_features(info, boot); taint |= update_32bit_cpu_features(cpu, &info->aarch32, &boot->aarch32); } @@ -1251,6 +1286,28 @@ has_cpuid_feature(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *entry, int scope) return feature_matches(val, entry); } +const struct cpumask *system_32bit_el0_cpumask(void) +{ + if (!system_supports_32bit_el0()) + return cpu_none_mask; + + if (static_branch_unlikely(&arm64_mismatched_32bit_el0)) + return cpu_32bit_el0_mask; + + return cpu_possible_mask; +} + +static bool has_32bit_el0(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *entry, int scope) +{ + if (!has_cpuid_feature(entry, scope)) + return allow_mismatched_32bit_el0; + + if (scope == SCOPE_SYSTEM) + pr_info("detected: 32-bit EL0 Support\n"); + + return true; +} + static bool has_useable_gicv3_cpuif(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *entry, int scope) { bool has_sre; @@ -1869,10 +1926,9 @@ static const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities arm64_features[] = { .cpu_enable = cpu_copy_el2regs, }, { - .desc = "32-bit EL0 Support", - .capability = ARM64_HAS_32BIT_EL0, + .capability = ARM64_HAS_32BIT_EL0_DO_NOT_USE, .type = ARM64_CPUCAP_SYSTEM_FEATURE, - .matches = has_cpuid_feature, + .matches = has_32bit_el0, .sys_reg = SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1, .sign = FTR_UNSIGNED, .field_pos = ID_AA64PFR0_EL0_SHIFT, @@ -2381,7 +2437,7 @@ static const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities compat_elf_hwcaps[] = { {}, }; -static void __init cap_set_elf_hwcap(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *cap) +static void cap_set_elf_hwcap(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *cap) { switch (cap->hwcap_type) { case CAP_HWCAP: @@ -2426,7 +2482,7 @@ static bool cpus_have_elf_hwcap(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *cap) return rc; } -static void __init setup_elf_hwcaps(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *hwcaps) +static void setup_elf_hwcaps(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *hwcaps) { /* We support emulation of accesses to CPU ID feature registers */ cpu_set_named_feature(CPUID); @@ -2601,7 +2657,7 @@ static void check_early_cpu_features(void) } static void -verify_local_elf_hwcaps(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *caps) +__verify_local_elf_hwcaps(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *caps) { for (; caps->matches; caps++) @@ -2612,6 +2668,14 @@ verify_local_elf_hwcaps(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *caps) } } +static void verify_local_elf_hwcaps(void) +{ + __verify_local_elf_hwcaps(arm64_elf_hwcaps); + + if (id_aa64pfr0_32bit_el0(read_cpuid(ID_AA64PFR0_EL1))) + __verify_local_elf_hwcaps(compat_elf_hwcaps); +} + static void verify_sve_features(void) { u64 safe_zcr = read_sanitised_ftr_reg(SYS_ZCR_EL1); @@ -2676,11 +2740,7 @@ static void verify_local_cpu_capabilities(void) * on all secondary CPUs. */ verify_local_cpu_caps(SCOPE_ALL & ~SCOPE_BOOT_CPU); - - verify_local_elf_hwcaps(arm64_elf_hwcaps); - - if (system_supports_32bit_el0()) - verify_local_elf_hwcaps(compat_elf_hwcaps); + verify_local_elf_hwcaps(); if (system_supports_sve()) verify_sve_features(); @@ -2815,6 +2875,34 @@ void __init setup_cpu_features(void) ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN); } +static int enable_mismatched_32bit_el0(unsigned int cpu) +{ + struct cpuinfo_arm64 *info = &per_cpu(cpu_data, cpu); + bool cpu_32bit = id_aa64pfr0_32bit_el0(info->reg_id_aa64pfr0); + + if (cpu_32bit) { + cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, cpu_32bit_el0_mask); + static_branch_enable_cpuslocked(&arm64_mismatched_32bit_el0); + setup_elf_hwcaps(compat_elf_hwcaps); + } + + return 0; +} + +static int __init init_32bit_el0_mask(void) +{ + if (!allow_mismatched_32bit_el0) + return 0; + + if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&cpu_32bit_el0_mask, GFP_KERNEL)) + return -ENOMEM; + + return cpuhp_setup_state(CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_DYN, + "arm64/mismatched_32bit_el0:online", + enable_mismatched_32bit_el0, NULL); +} +subsys_initcall_sync(init_32bit_el0_mask); + static void __maybe_unused cpu_enable_cnp(struct arm64_cpu_capabilities const *cap) { cpu_replace_ttbr1(lm_alias(swapper_pg_dir)); diff --git a/arch/arm64/tools/cpucaps b/arch/arm64/tools/cpucaps index 21fbdda7086e..49305c2e6dfd 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/tools/cpucaps +++ b/arch/arm64/tools/cpucaps @@ -3,7 +3,8 @@ # Internal CPU capabilities constants, keep this list sorted BTI -HAS_32BIT_EL0 +# Unreliable: use system_supports_32bit_el0() instead. +HAS_32BIT_EL0_DO_NOT_USE HAS_32BIT_EL1 HAS_ADDRESS_AUTH HAS_ADDRESS_AUTH_ARCH -- 2.32.0.rc1.229.g3e70b5a671-goog _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-08 18:03 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-06-08 18:02 [PATCH v9 00/20] Add support for 32-bit tasks on asymmetric AArch32 systems Will Deacon 2021-06-08 18:02 ` Will Deacon 2021-06-08 18:02 ` [PATCH v9 01/20] arm64: cpuinfo: Split AArch32 registers out into a separate struct Will Deacon 2021-06-08 18:02 ` Will Deacon 2021-06-08 18:02 ` Will Deacon [this message] 2021-06-08 18:02 ` [PATCH v9 02/20] arm64: Allow mismatched 32-bit EL0 support Will Deacon 2021-06-08 18:02 ` [PATCH v9 03/20] KVM: arm64: Kill 32-bit vCPUs on systems with mismatched " Will Deacon 2021-06-08 18:02 ` Will Deacon 2021-06-08 18:02 ` [PATCH v9 04/20] arm64: Kill 32-bit applications scheduled on 64-bit-only CPUs Will Deacon 2021-06-08 18:02 ` Will Deacon 2021-06-08 18:02 ` [PATCH v9 05/20] sched: Introduce task_cpu_possible_mask() to limit fallback rq selection Will Deacon 2021-06-08 18:02 ` Will Deacon 2021-06-08 18:02 ` [PATCH v9 06/20] cpuset: Don't use the cpu_possible_mask as a last resort for cgroup v1 Will Deacon 2021-06-08 18:02 ` Will Deacon 2021-06-10 12:59 ` Valentin Schneider 2021-06-10 12:59 ` Valentin Schneider 2021-06-08 18:03 ` [PATCH v9 07/20] cpuset: Honour task_cpu_possible_mask() in guarantee_online_cpus() Will Deacon 2021-06-08 18:03 ` Will Deacon 2021-06-08 18:03 ` [PATCH v9 08/20] cpuset: Cleanup cpuset_cpus_allowed_fallback() use in select_fallback_rq() Will Deacon 2021-06-08 18:03 ` Will Deacon 2021-06-10 12:59 ` Valentin Schneider 2021-06-10 12:59 ` Valentin Schneider 2021-06-08 18:03 ` [PATCH v9 09/20] sched: Reject CPU affinity changes based on task_cpu_possible_mask() Will Deacon 2021-06-08 18:03 ` Will Deacon 2021-06-08 18:03 ` [PATCH v9 10/20] sched: Introduce task_struct::user_cpus_ptr to track requested affinity Will Deacon 2021-06-08 18:03 ` Will Deacon 2021-06-08 18:03 ` [PATCH v9 11/20] sched: Split the guts of sched_setaffinity() into a helper function Will Deacon 2021-06-08 18:03 ` Will Deacon 2021-06-08 18:03 ` [PATCH v9 12/20] sched: Allow task CPU affinity to be restricted on asymmetric systems Will Deacon 2021-06-08 18:03 ` Will Deacon 2021-06-10 13:00 ` Valentin Schneider 2021-06-10 13:00 ` Valentin Schneider 2021-06-08 18:03 ` [PATCH v9 13/20] sched: Introduce dl_task_check_affinity() to check proposed affinity Will Deacon 2021-06-08 18:03 ` Will Deacon 2021-06-08 18:03 ` [PATCH v9 14/20] arm64: Implement task_cpu_possible_mask() Will Deacon 2021-06-08 18:03 ` Will Deacon 2021-06-08 18:03 ` [PATCH v9 15/20] arm64: exec: Adjust affinity for compat tasks with mismatched 32-bit EL0 Will Deacon 2021-06-08 18:03 ` Will Deacon 2021-06-08 18:03 ` [PATCH v9 16/20] arm64: Prevent offlining first CPU with 32-bit EL0 on mismatched system Will Deacon 2021-06-08 18:03 ` Will Deacon 2021-06-08 18:03 ` [PATCH v9 17/20] arm64: Advertise CPUs capable of running 32-bit applications in sysfs Will Deacon 2021-06-08 18:03 ` Will Deacon 2021-06-08 18:03 ` [PATCH v9 18/20] arm64: Hook up cmdline parameter to allow mismatched 32-bit EL0 Will Deacon 2021-06-08 18:03 ` Will Deacon 2021-06-08 18:03 ` [PATCH v9 19/20] arm64: Remove logic to kill 32-bit tasks on 64-bit-only cores Will Deacon 2021-06-08 18:03 ` Will Deacon 2021-06-08 18:03 ` [PATCH v9 20/20] Documentation: arm64: describe asymmetric 32-bit support Will Deacon 2021-06-08 18:03 ` Will Deacon 2021-06-11 16:15 ` [PATCH v9 00/20] Add support for 32-bit tasks on asymmetric AArch32 systems Will Deacon 2021-06-11 16:15 ` Will Deacon
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20210608180313.11502-3-will@kernel.org \ --to=will@kernel.org \ --cc=bristot@redhat.com \ --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \ --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \ --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \ --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \ --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \ --cc=kernel-team@android.com \ --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \ --cc=maz@kernel.org \ --cc=mingo@redhat.com \ --cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \ --cc=peterz@infradead.org \ --cc=qais.yousef@arm.com \ --cc=qperret@google.com \ --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \ --cc=surenb@google.com \ --cc=tj@kernel.org \ --cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \ --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \ --subject='Re: [PATCH v9 02/20] arm64: Allow mismatched 32-bit EL0 support' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.