From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1CA7C48BCD for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 18:49:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5C2561182 for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 18:49:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229911AbhFISvA (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jun 2021 14:51:00 -0400 Received: from mail-oi1-f176.google.com ([209.85.167.176]:46051 "EHLO mail-oi1-f176.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229507AbhFISu6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jun 2021 14:50:58 -0400 Received: by mail-oi1-f176.google.com with SMTP id w127so26076841oig.12; Wed, 09 Jun 2021 11:48:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=BueZDl8UmwBvcB2M29g6BnJ10GKINZ2H0CmaSoCgIo0=; b=B8x49XDTxgLpJxDvFgR97U5qogOZnbi6/ABQlijOjPtglbF59gIr0AiCro8UL3+EN/ skhSuXmaUkrshzkasPxX8YqYoj+whRFQThYjRnqLQPDiOMfoXxBl3+IbJaIdzvb7IJlL nJDZh5JyaTzD9Oaaox9pgpPJeN+8NWScM5spI68uux5UAci7iOrfxyvYG7X498TCE2AH TRI5+vFWCOmQWcB8+XNdiWDFSQ6Xi3+/329sRnkSbeI3wv4gS4uYPvUFtlVnETjR4YST x/Wgdd783TsR6/AGeoZWmn1Gqp2XlTSqOjJ24BAamjA3FoUDIEKL5hTTwlRb+871cxt/ RRnQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=BueZDl8UmwBvcB2M29g6BnJ10GKINZ2H0CmaSoCgIo0=; b=jXr672wZIMCVXo0sCj+T0fFyqC3r5eIjkli7QTkOSzB/PajGp4nc2wc/ZCQ6oQCisR hdw1IP9yHquMDxTNi7nBYwk3dM3CGllfwOF0A4dMurkH1co+W7isDQYAKfVcbddcfBuH LQY3gJXgJ60KZRazi+ciW37j5NB9sdE18JshDhtdOWW/Ct2sF8oNHNfHf5dt7VoEoyq8 GiBU6BrxxNBBE27INswraBkeR3ykPBcrnYrxCLRcriJtYIuRj+q3vM5N84HMhthytIEA 3zt1zZjtw9DKRclCbzMLgnhhiU30kgzFk0P/4X7mkRZkzu9ZA0PLSHzaL9YZYHNm2cCK lo+Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533qboM2I4DLqW7Sb4cnq3B17g0n4fomkFXlPfloiBCSjcgUbteO J7Yo5Z7NxcxGjL274/v4UpA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwIAG5gcu1E2UE4mgJk8jmmXWeLHmaIhfzgNwgjbk0sE5BoaZ8KafKSeU2PVG5LvIEqy8noXA== X-Received: by 2002:aca:650b:: with SMTP id m11mr662977oim.99.1623264470607; Wed, 09 Jun 2021 11:47:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([2600:1700:e321:62f0:329c:23ff:fee3:9d7c]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t14sm107393ooh.39.2021.06.09.11.47.49 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 09 Jun 2021 11:47:50 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Guenter Roeck Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2021 11:47:48 -0700 From: Guenter Roeck To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/29] 4.9.272-rc1 review Message-ID: <20210609184748.GB2531680@roeck-us.net> References: <20210608175927.821075974@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210608175927.821075974@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jun 08, 2021 at 08:26:54PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.272 release. > There are 29 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Thu, 10 Jun 2021 17:59:18 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > Build results: total: 163 pass: 163 fail: 0 Qemu test results: total: 383 pass: 383 fail: 0 Tested-by: Guenter Roeck Guenter