From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA20BC48BD1 for ; Fri, 11 Jun 2021 19:24:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B2C7613D9 for ; Fri, 11 Jun 2021 19:24:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231208AbhFKT0f (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Jun 2021 15:26:35 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:35324 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230374AbhFKT0c (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Jun 2021 15:26:32 -0400 Received: from mail-ej1-x632.google.com (mail-ej1-x632.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::632]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A60EC061574; Fri, 11 Jun 2021 12:24:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ej1-x632.google.com with SMTP id k7so6077709ejv.12; Fri, 11 Jun 2021 12:24:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=QVn2XpNydMMfSU7bRQCNWOFOmVIdLgML4UEm0EkT7pQ=; b=TXuWpJuPWpt3qqHX5SFrlDo4EPqrxK8R5S4Jw5oPL5VNKvPgjsBnWabOjL9ew29gW0 jsCdhhjq42JIFokffm2W5W/mLfk1L0B8jq1EWjz5/EuZ9pTpGPpbCHo4Di0gWaaYz9k8 R7PbGeQKW36hxl6us6bshYAzeLw3GdCAXYVRHgE4IYUyd4N7a6fkcR8k86G1Y5xRCTRX 4EvKl+Dw9aeFDUf9c7F7I4xANM0d9Va7nA/yL7YuAVvyPDDwdoEpFJzFSuXxvPsWTjbA JmBeAn2I+3orMj0x3xSkNzk1GtvnIPA9NE6eo+3MREA2rL0lr2JMyeuit+tlZs/4ZiSN luiQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=QVn2XpNydMMfSU7bRQCNWOFOmVIdLgML4UEm0EkT7pQ=; b=bO39r+KBQ225TUjxhFNg/DImOyFCOt6A6A9dqL2RzRFyHUjRWWE3yNq6K/R/9ILC1M wnXIrUUTinEDlKx8p+W5j0DATM+Bj9QzDtEOmILuNrkeTLPl3FgTCTb3ej+qpXIhMtKY T/Ej+3ygHfIPA/Wcjbtl4CeVsVfhohbueyXne2LHCwUBmkUf84xGASIYj+KuZH3gLoWp r0l1cbA5+TvhhXac9myA4dH80vUFMbXtnEt5vnF3oleHi5KqrH9163R+LSwD71eJUMtj ty+mg0yRaz7161s9nfn0aIPkzFQUSOhISEMTzsYN1dp2aWUqIuYg4UiTeIAuatVGKTjE SbOg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531iNoG/Wh8VwAuy5gqj/9QONLYBAGAGQIfBEWkuuYVXLjL2MHhG ZNhSfZJoa54YSq7mtgYxw43elH8Rtmk= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz46iCdebyRYDndYc2A5VY55T92JgyLWmkTWxaliADt8/+l924Qc5JLRa3CFWLcc+MZ/FIgzw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:1806:: with SMTP id v6mr4994778eje.454.1623439458835; Fri, 11 Jun 2021 12:24:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from skbuf ([188.26.52.84]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f12sm2887977edf.72.2021.06.11.12.24.17 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 11 Jun 2021 12:24:18 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2021 22:24:17 +0300 From: Vladimir Oltean To: Oleksij Rempel Cc: Woojung Huh , UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com, Andrew Lunn , Florian Fainelli , Vivien Didelot , "David S. Miller" , Jakub Kicinski , kernel@pengutronix.de, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Russell King , Michael Grzeschik Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 8/9] net: dsa: dsa_slave_phy_connect(): extend phy's flags with port specific phy flags Message-ID: <20210611192417.gvfxi2kbfjx4jv3d@skbuf> References: <20210611071527.9333-1-o.rempel@pengutronix.de> <20210611071527.9333-9-o.rempel@pengutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210611071527.9333-9-o.rempel@pengutronix.de> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 09:15:26AM +0200, Oleksij Rempel wrote: > This patch extends the flags of the phy that's being connected with the > port specific flags of the switch port. > > This is needed to handle a port specific erratum of the KSZ8873 switch, > which is added in a later patch. > > Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel > --- What happens differently between having this patch and not having it?