From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5FEBC48BD1 for ; Fri, 11 Jun 2021 20:28:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC5F56128A for ; Fri, 11 Jun 2021 20:28:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231143AbhFKUak (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Jun 2021 16:30:40 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:49404 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230440AbhFKUag (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Jun 2021 16:30:36 -0400 Received: from mail-oi1-x22f.google.com (mail-oi1-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::22f]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A3DD7C0617AF for ; Fri, 11 Jun 2021 13:28:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-oi1-x22f.google.com with SMTP id w127so7046127oig.12 for ; Fri, 11 Jun 2021 13:28:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=mq9yk0jmqYNrNx4ATe87xSPxfngX+qVabCUcvhwwLeM=; b=gIUNAeWOEJbSMIb5yJAT7lEpehOwTYtt6M8RkdDqRi/FnB/W3Vd5Ud0TIdSjLocb8I mauolw/QFqTx9sj30l2BzJ3qASWX7cA554NbeP6UlgsCyN2q/EAIAy8oJpE/cAUZoLYM dJZUbEBrbStFLBKgBg5OcSDYzicLMW3IzT5KJyTDXKlUX8lBUZyfn+4NxMvLtDJHbfVS 7WGSHgj3qou+6AkNWGvM+llvDiisqxPandCDba+CQzDxeVatXu6H7M5sYyLA1+yVuCel rViz2OfLv88s7LXXltiB0kJPA2ShtVjluTssBkQg1SXPR7DYtoY4VAEApfx0wAwmgB9r h5zg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=mq9yk0jmqYNrNx4ATe87xSPxfngX+qVabCUcvhwwLeM=; b=eujsPQmJ2CyGLUjJ6UtxSL6nw++mchPEf+rmFV66fiRh11vjCynFAflqUI2q6MdzGk 5BhReUvOWwQswKIlYyXWRoSVnRqOPdqugGZ42gpffmfFrnetANcuD4p9saAorq5rT4Wq 4n/sCbvJNU3WUb5UkWw2/4kx6PqmFG97PevlngEedLk6q2r/pG8mApACqNnpfiuWQlTj gHLHRd7wlgdjiPvvfyCCicVXka4jkpiWz9fF6MdEvMtkLAKYYo/zpzGngUkUH0B+/rcF Hvwrxc0LRB9hSvCljM3C/ElNACwfYVt7tOW/PRwwjVArER6uSPY7BGNSFWU7ybcDuKoW 4WPA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533Y/dfLof7572b95Dcc6hYXlCXd5L8lV/5jgHJPlT/WA+P3L09n a3X/raxmcYuctv4+FJE9T+0fRAB3xq4G7Q== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwJ0QVqHs40kzl7A4Z1r9NzCy8ANMDCse4dnwLVaNQNkSGMK12v2sNjeOVhXLdRXCyAYgjrlw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:9b2:: with SMTP id e18mr15427661oig.109.1623443302871; Fri, 11 Jun 2021 13:28:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (fixed-187-188-155-231.totalplay.net. [187.188.155.231]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k84sm1388028oia.8.2021.06.11.13.28.22 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 11 Jun 2021 13:28:22 -0700 (PDT) From: Felipe Contreras To: git@vger.kernel.org Cc: =?UTF-8?q?=C3=86var=20Arnfj=C3=B6r=C3=B0=20Bjarmason?= , Junio C Hamano , Derrick Stolee , Felipe Contreras Subject: [PATCH 1/2] doc: avoid using the gender of other people Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2021 15:28:18 -0500 Message-Id: <20210611202819.47077-2-felipe.contreras@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.32.0 In-Reply-To: <20210611202819.47077-1-felipe.contreras@gmail.com> References: <20210611202819.47077-1-felipe.contreras@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Some people have a problem with using a female reviewer or a female developer as an example, and since this is an irrelevant detail, let's say goodbye to our illustrative female colleagues. Inspired-by: Derrick Stolee Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras --- Documentation/SubmittingPatches | 5 ++--- Documentation/git-push.txt | 4 ++-- Documentation/user-manual.txt | 2 +- 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/SubmittingPatches b/Documentation/SubmittingPatches index 55287d72e0..3e215f4d80 100644 --- a/Documentation/SubmittingPatches +++ b/Documentation/SubmittingPatches @@ -373,9 +373,8 @@ If you like, you can put extra tags at the end: . `Acked-by:` says that the person who is more familiar with the area the patch attempts to modify liked the patch. . `Reviewed-by:`, unlike the other tags, can only be offered by the - reviewer and means that she is completely satisfied that the patch - is ready for application. It is usually offered only after a - detailed review. + reviewers themselves when they are completely satisfied with the + patch after a detailed analysis. . `Tested-by:` is used to indicate that the person applied the patch and found it to have the desired effect. diff --git a/Documentation/git-push.txt b/Documentation/git-push.txt index a953c7c387..2f25aa3a29 100644 --- a/Documentation/git-push.txt +++ b/Documentation/git-push.txt @@ -244,8 +244,8 @@ Imagine that you have to rebase what you have already published. You will have to bypass the "must fast-forward" rule in order to replace the history you originally published with the rebased history. If somebody else built on top of your original history while you are -rebasing, the tip of the branch at the remote may advance with her -commit, and blindly pushing with `--force` will lose her work. +rebasing, the tip of the branch at the remote may advance with their +commit, and blindly pushing with `--force` will lose their work. + This option allows you to say that you expect the history you are updating is what you rebased and want to replace. If the remote ref diff --git a/Documentation/user-manual.txt b/Documentation/user-manual.txt index f9e54b8674..96240598e3 100644 --- a/Documentation/user-manual.txt +++ b/Documentation/user-manual.txt @@ -2792,7 +2792,7 @@ A fast-forward looks something like this: In some cases it is possible that the new head will *not* actually be a descendant of the old head. For example, the developer may have -realized she made a serious mistake, and decided to backtrack, +realized a serious mistake was made and decided to backtrack, resulting in a situation like: ................................................ -- 2.32.0