All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@redhat.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Martin KaFai Lau" <kafai@fb.com>,
	"Hangbin Liu" <liuhangbin@gmail.com>,
	"Jesper Dangaard Brouer" <brouer@redhat.com>,
	"Magnus Karlsson" <magnus.karlsson@gmail.com>,
	"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
	"Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@redhat.com>,
	"Jassi Brar" <jaswinder.singh@linaro.org>,
	"Ilias Apalodimas" <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v2 14/16] netsec: remove rcu_read_lock() around XDP program invocation
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 16:54:53 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210615145455.564037-15-toke@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210615145455.564037-1-toke@redhat.com>

The netsec driver has a rcu_read_lock()/rcu_read_unlock() pair around the
full RX loop, covering everything up to and including xdp_do_flush(). This
is actually the correct behaviour, but because it all happens in a single
NAPI poll cycle (and thus under local_bh_disable()), it is also technically
redundant.

With the addition of RCU annotations to the XDP_REDIRECT map types that
take bh execution into account, lockdep even understands this to be safe,
so there's really no reason to keep the rcu_read_lock() around anymore, so
let's just remove it.

Cc: Jassi Brar <jaswinder.singh@linaro.org>
Cc: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/socionext/netsec.c | 7 ++++---
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/socionext/netsec.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/socionext/netsec.c
index dfc85cc68173..e07b7c870046 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/socionext/netsec.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/socionext/netsec.c
@@ -958,7 +958,6 @@ static int netsec_process_rx(struct netsec_priv *priv, int budget)
 
 	xdp_init_buff(&xdp, PAGE_SIZE, &dring->xdp_rxq);
 
-	rcu_read_lock();
 	xdp_prog = READ_ONCE(priv->xdp_prog);
 	dma_dir = page_pool_get_dma_dir(dring->page_pool);
 
@@ -1019,6 +1018,10 @@ static int netsec_process_rx(struct netsec_priv *priv, int budget)
 				 pkt_len, false);
 
 		if (xdp_prog) {
+			/* This code is invoked within a single NAPI poll cycle
+			 * and thus under local_bh_disable(), which provides the
+			 * needed RCU protection.
+			 */
 			xdp_result = netsec_run_xdp(priv, xdp_prog, &xdp);
 			if (xdp_result != NETSEC_XDP_PASS) {
 				xdp_act |= xdp_result;
@@ -1069,8 +1072,6 @@ static int netsec_process_rx(struct netsec_priv *priv, int budget)
 	}
 	netsec_finalize_xdp_rx(priv, xdp_act, xdp_xmit);
 
-	rcu_read_unlock();
-
 	return done;
 }
 
-- 
2.31.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-06-15 15:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-15 14:54 [PATCH bpf-next v2 00/16] Clean up and document RCU-based object protection for XDP_REDIRECT Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-06-15 14:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 01/16] rcu: Create an unrcu_pointer() to remove __rcu from a pointer Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-06-15 14:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 02/16] bpf: allow RCU-protected lookups to happen from bh context Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-06-15 14:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 03/16] xdp: add proper __rcu annotations to redirect map entries Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-06-17 19:41   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2021-06-17 21:13     ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-06-15 14:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 04/16] ena: remove rcu_read_lock() around XDP program invocation Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-06-15 14:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 05/16] bnxt: " Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-06-15 14:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 06/16] thunderx: " Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-06-15 14:54   ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-06-15 14:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 07/16] freescale: " Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-06-16 14:58   ` Camelia Alexandra Groza
2021-06-15 14:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 08/16] net: intel: " Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-06-15 14:54   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Toke =?unknown-8bit?q?H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?=
2021-06-15 14:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 09/16] marvell: " Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-06-15 14:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 10/16] mlx4: " Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-06-15 14:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 11/16] nfp: " Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-06-15 14:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 12/16] qede: " Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-06-15 14:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 13/16] sfc: " Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-06-15 14:54 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen [this message]
2021-06-15 14:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 15/16] stmmac: " Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-06-15 14:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 16/16] net: ti: " Toke Høiland-Jørgensen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210615145455.564037-15-toke@redhat.com \
    --to=toke@redhat.com \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=brouer@redhat.com \
    --cc=ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org \
    --cc=jaswinder.singh@linaro.org \
    --cc=kafai@fb.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=liuhangbin@gmail.com \
    --cc=magnus.karlsson@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.