From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 504B3C48BE5 for ; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 09:13:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3951461055 for ; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 09:13:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232299AbhFPJPm (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jun 2021 05:15:42 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:59694 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232148AbhFPJPk (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jun 2021 05:15:40 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2386731B; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 02:13:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from e120937-lin (unknown [172.31.20.19]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6EA963F70D; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 02:13:31 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 10:13:28 +0100 From: Cristian Marussi To: Jonathan Cameron Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org, sudeep.holla@arm.com, james.quinlan@broadcom.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, etienne.carriere@linaro.org, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, souvik.chakravarty@arm.com, igor.skalkin@opensynergy.com, peter.hilber@opensynergy.com, alex.bennee@linaro.org, jean-philippe@linaro.org, mikhail.golubev@opensynergy.com, anton.yakovlev@opensynergy.com, Vasyl.Vavrychuk@opensynergy.com, Andriy.Tryshnivskyy@opensynergy.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 07/16] firmware: arm_scmi: Add op to override max message # Message-ID: <20210616091328.GE35368@e120937-lin> References: <20210611165937.701-1-cristian.marussi@arm.com> <20210611165937.701-8-cristian.marussi@arm.com> <20210614150415.00005d92@Huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210614150415.00005d92@Huawei.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 03:04:15PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > On Fri, 11 Jun 2021 17:59:28 +0100 > Cristian Marussi wrote: > > > From: Igor Skalkin > > > > The number of simultaneously pending messages that the upcoming > > scmi-virtio transport can support depends on the virtio device (SCMI > > platform) and can differ for each channel. (The scmi-virtio transport > > does only have one tx and at most 1 rx channel.) > > > > Add an optional transport op so that scmi-virtio can report the actual > > max message # for each channel type. Respect these new limits. > > > > Reflect that the limit in struct scmi_desc is now only a default any > > more. > > > > [ Peter: Adapted patch for submission to upstream. ] > > > > Co-developed-by: Peter Hilber > > Signed-off-by: Igor Skalkin > > Signed-off-by: Peter Hilber > Cristian, > > Give you are sending this on to the list, should have your > Signed-off-by as well. > Right, sorry for this, the series is still sort of WIP so I have not properly cleanup and signed these if I have not touched it. My bad, I'll fix. Thanks, Cristian From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.4 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5778BC48BE5 for ; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 09:15:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 16CFB61107 for ; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 09:15:06 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 16CFB61107 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=RJCthHDz6Zhu9uji/8FnM//s3Rz01vW2QRBzByxk3sQ=; b=ha6gcp/u08RJpJ 6Py/IDgjsr2t+qxpDnZkNQ/wZWfE9JaTKkroiiU+Kf6Xs8AM7SVvWsQF7hDejGLfkrGS9cLRnUUa6 3VLoVUXK/VU+l/i13CGr9uFHhBdCp+2D1QC1+PwQdjkmsntJl72HiiQ5JAYtYkvcVgIqNgw7rlTKG ihVknPSVHXe4cmUHOQ5NSv513B3Zgxp42r7tlM5aq9IjYYFGu5V8p3lOFcikYtY7cQSfZN9X/SHWR zhWoK2A49MIJCwSGH8dKUTifJAyFmFUHM1QpAuEeT4e5uGAP/qnpf/dH7LsOjM2jfdZlhozkenYrp /j9pPV/maVbl9xvqO+Cg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ltRcE-005XFM-PH; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 09:13:42 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ltRc8-005XDR-Vf for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 09:13:39 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2386731B; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 02:13:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from e120937-lin (unknown [172.31.20.19]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6EA963F70D; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 02:13:31 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 10:13:28 +0100 From: Cristian Marussi To: Jonathan Cameron Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org, sudeep.holla@arm.com, james.quinlan@broadcom.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, etienne.carriere@linaro.org, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, souvik.chakravarty@arm.com, igor.skalkin@opensynergy.com, peter.hilber@opensynergy.com, alex.bennee@linaro.org, jean-philippe@linaro.org, mikhail.golubev@opensynergy.com, anton.yakovlev@opensynergy.com, Vasyl.Vavrychuk@opensynergy.com, Andriy.Tryshnivskyy@opensynergy.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 07/16] firmware: arm_scmi: Add op to override max message # Message-ID: <20210616091328.GE35368@e120937-lin> References: <20210611165937.701-1-cristian.marussi@arm.com> <20210611165937.701-8-cristian.marussi@arm.com> <20210614150415.00005d92@Huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210614150415.00005d92@Huawei.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20210616_021337_125038_441B542B X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 18.79 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 03:04:15PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > On Fri, 11 Jun 2021 17:59:28 +0100 > Cristian Marussi wrote: > > > From: Igor Skalkin > > > > The number of simultaneously pending messages that the upcoming > > scmi-virtio transport can support depends on the virtio device (SCMI > > platform) and can differ for each channel. (The scmi-virtio transport > > does only have one tx and at most 1 rx channel.) > > > > Add an optional transport op so that scmi-virtio can report the actual > > max message # for each channel type. Respect these new limits. > > > > Reflect that the limit in struct scmi_desc is now only a default any > > more. > > > > [ Peter: Adapted patch for submission to upstream. ] > > > > Co-developed-by: Peter Hilber > > Signed-off-by: Igor Skalkin > > Signed-off-by: Peter Hilber > Cristian, > > Give you are sending this on to the list, should have your > Signed-off-by as well. > Right, sorry for this, the series is still sort of WIP so I have not properly cleanup and signed these if I have not touched it. My bad, I'll fix. Thanks, Cristian _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel