On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 02:20:45PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:

> Looking at the code, that is ideal case. Only issue I can see is that
> core DMA mapping device being used is incorrect. The core would use
> ctlr->dev.parent which is the spi0 device here.

Why would the parent of the controller be a SPI device?

> But in this case, that wont work. We have a parent qup device which is
> the parent for both spi and dma device and needs to be used for
> dma-mapping! 

> If we allow drivers to set dma mapping device and use that, then I can
> reuse the core. Let me know if that is agreeable to you and I can hack
> this up. Maybe add a new member in spi_controller which is filled by
> drivers in can_dma() callback?

Possibly, I'd need to see the code.