From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4FB2C49361 for ; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 20:43:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0E6F613FE for ; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 20:43:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231685AbhFQUpM (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Jun 2021 16:45:12 -0400 Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de ([195.135.220.28]:53274 "EHLO smtp-out1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231468AbhFQUpM (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Jun 2021 16:45:12 -0400 Received: from relay2.suse.de (relay2.suse.de [149.44.160.134]) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6F0021AE5; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 20:43:03 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1623962583; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=OGEp0cDQadP0R2dzXlH4D/NolWpubUGq8lT4saxX5Sk=; b=ZIv5mGaSJhkPmbf8t9Fpq8IGtpn4ZyERIB15b+3O429fk7hyDgTc4CN23oClHNiXK7QmO4 KiN2gbebFL8ZkikcAv8bsgANUvSqKw/+UvGllYp1yRyWojBoGWtno8GrMOFhEgY3ScV5kg zw3SliG1HPC4P9gK4h+RMmnRuV2r5FA= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1623962583; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=OGEp0cDQadP0R2dzXlH4D/NolWpubUGq8lT4saxX5Sk=; b=rIkWCo8R5R9SJkaaZYHKfbqp5kxJB2pEz5GvTBtKzZcaC9qwXV95YxVyiITwrSkfxFJcZx 6LMgGhP9L05FW+DQ== Received: from ds.suse.cz (ds.suse.cz [10.100.12.205]) by relay2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D083A3B85; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 20:43:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ds.suse.cz (Postfix, from userid 10065) id 65A43DAF4C; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 22:40:15 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2021 22:40:15 +0200 From: David Sterba To: Anand Jain Cc: Qu Wenruo , Qu Wenruo , linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/30] btrfs: add data write support for subpage Message-ID: <20210617204015.GA28158@twin.jikos.cz> Reply-To: dsterba@suse.cz Mail-Followup-To: dsterba@suse.cz, Anand Jain , Qu Wenruo , Qu Wenruo , linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org References: <20210531085106.259490-1-wqu@suse.com> <55ba3489-98de-3a69-8912-3a32e73ffca4@oracle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23.1-rc1 (2014-03-12) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jun 08, 2021 at 07:11:03PM +0800, Anand Jain wrote: > > Thanks for clarifying. I wasted too much time figuring out what's wrong > with my setup. It wasn't explicit in the cover letter. > In that case, there is no regression in this set (plus with a bug fix > patch as below). My Apologies to send this late: > > Tested-by: Anand Jain [aarch64] Thanks for testing, I've updated the patches with the tag.