All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: akpm@linux-foundation.org
To: aarcange@redhat.com, jack@suse.cz, jannh@google.com,
	jhubbard@nvidia.com, kirill@shutemov.name, mhocko@kernel.org,
	mike.kravetz@oracle.com, mm-commits@vger.kernel.org,
	willy@infradead.org, youquan.song@intel.com
Subject: + hugetlb-remove-prep_compound_huge_page-cleanup.patch added to -mm tree
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2021 21:45:30 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210623044530.hhRLf-TWa%akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)


The patch titled
     Subject: hugetlb: remove prep_compound_huge_page cleanup
has been added to the -mm tree.  Its filename is
     hugetlb-remove-prep_compound_huge_page-cleanup.patch

This patch should soon appear at
    https://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/hugetlb-remove-prep_compound_huge_page-cleanup.patch
and later at
    https://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/hugetlb-remove-prep_compound_huge_page-cleanup.patch

Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
   a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
   b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
   c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
      reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's

*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***

The -mm tree is included into linux-next and is updated
there every 3-4 working days

------------------------------------------------------
From: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Subject: hugetlb: remove prep_compound_huge_page cleanup

Patch series "Fix prep_compound_gigantic_page ref count adjustment".

These patches address the possible race between
prep_compound_gigantic_page and __page_cache_add_speculative as described
by Jann Horn in [1].

The first patch simply removes the unnecessary/obsolete helper routine
prep_compound_huge_page to make the actual fix a little simpler.

The second patch is the actual fix and has a detailed explanation in the
commit message.

This potential issue has existed for almost 10 years and I am unaware of
anyone actually hitting the race.  I did not cc stable, but would be happy
to squash the patches and send to stable if anyone thinks that is a good
idea.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/CAG48ez23q0Jy9cuVnwAe7t_fdhMk2S7N5Hdi-GLcCeq5bsfLxw@mail.gmail.com/


This patch (of 2):

I could not think of a reliable way to recreate the issue for testing.
Rather, I 'simulated errors' to exercise all the error paths.

The routine prep_compound_huge_page is a simple wrapper to call either
prep_compound_gigantic_page or prep_compound_page.  However, it is only
called from gather_bootmem_prealloc which only processes gigantic pages. 
Eliminate the routine and call prep_compound_gigantic_page directly.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210622021423.154662-1-mike.kravetz@oracle.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210622021423.154662-2-mike.kravetz@oracle.com
Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
Cc: "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Youquan Song <youquan.song@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---

 mm/hugetlb.c |   29 ++++++++++-------------------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

--- a/mm/hugetlb.c~hugetlb-remove-prep_compound_huge_page-cleanup
+++ a/mm/hugetlb.c
@@ -1320,8 +1320,6 @@ static struct page *alloc_gigantic_page(
 	return alloc_contig_pages(nr_pages, gfp_mask, nid, nodemask);
 }
 
-static void prep_new_huge_page(struct hstate *h, struct page *page, int nid);
-static void prep_compound_gigantic_page(struct page *page, unsigned int order);
 #else /* !CONFIG_CONTIG_ALLOC */
 static struct page *alloc_gigantic_page(struct hstate *h, gfp_t gfp_mask,
 					int nid, nodemask_t *nodemask)
@@ -2759,16 +2757,10 @@ found:
 	return 1;
 }
 
-static void __init prep_compound_huge_page(struct page *page,
-		unsigned int order)
-{
-	if (unlikely(order > (MAX_ORDER - 1)))
-		prep_compound_gigantic_page(page, order);
-	else
-		prep_compound_page(page, order);
-}
-
-/* Put bootmem huge pages into the standard lists after mem_map is up */
+/*
+ * Put bootmem huge pages into the standard lists after mem_map is up.
+ * Note: This only applies to gigantic (order > MAX_ORDER) pages.
+ */
 static void __init gather_bootmem_prealloc(void)
 {
 	struct huge_bootmem_page *m;
@@ -2777,20 +2769,19 @@ static void __init gather_bootmem_preall
 		struct page *page = virt_to_page(m);
 		struct hstate *h = m->hstate;
 
+		VM_BUG_ON(!hstate_is_gigantic(h));
 		WARN_ON(page_count(page) != 1);
-		prep_compound_huge_page(page, huge_page_order(h));
+		prep_compound_gigantic_page(page, huge_page_order(h));
 		WARN_ON(PageReserved(page));
 		prep_new_huge_page(h, page, page_to_nid(page));
 		put_page(page); /* free it into the hugepage allocator */
 
 		/*
-		 * If we had gigantic hugepages allocated at boot time, we need
-		 * to restore the 'stolen' pages to totalram_pages in order to
-		 * fix confusing memory reports from free(1) and another
-		 * side-effects, like CommitLimit going negative.
+		 * We need to restore the 'stolen' pages to totalram_pages
+		 * in order to fix confusing memory reports from free(1) and
+		 * other side-effects, like CommitLimit going negative.
 		 */
-		if (hstate_is_gigantic(h))
-			adjust_managed_page_count(page, pages_per_huge_page(h));
+		adjust_managed_page_count(page, pages_per_huge_page(h));
 		cond_resched();
 	}
 }
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from mike.kravetz@oracle.com are

mm-hugetlb-alloc-the-vmemmap-pages-associated-with-each-hugetlb-page-fix.patch
hugetlb-remove-prep_compound_huge_page-cleanup.patch
hugetlb-address-ref-count-racing-in-prep_compound_gigantic_page.patch


                 reply	other threads:[~2021-06-23  4:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210623044530.hhRLf-TWa%akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
    --cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=youquan.song@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.