From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91059C2B9F4 for ; Fri, 25 Jun 2021 09:31:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7577461409 for ; Fri, 25 Jun 2021 09:31:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231341AbhFYJeB (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Jun 2021 05:34:01 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:46704 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231153AbhFYJd7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Jun 2021 05:33:59 -0400 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [IPv6:2a0a:51c0:0:12e:550::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B9504C061574; Fri, 25 Jun 2021 02:31:38 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2021 11:31:34 +0200 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1624613496; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=l2flqiuymxWiwpIOqOg21ZgP2AxJsVestVkKEHZV6LM=; b=IEenbfBOlJBeg2zMZTGiIVb3g6jSnomHNzNdLkPsc/wxRaZtEKsjiQPZYNfimDvFtvQwWN IBOwHk72w4AM7lVPtOoQnU7lv1oo/WCMd3RgTnLt6hwluENB8ssjuM+hJDx9sD4xKRNx1A Q3wo8/hp3d/IN6TfYLWa0NjyWK5kLaNP7wII8ShNnEmTGB5ZtBLmK3MIvXvay3dHyCv/+g egHkWZxeS+lOCASDspxUkm7QRS8tssoIAirvL5pEI74ZSuDIr9OVBUTDm+4llcmtsaAzvN 5mQ35Ou07pZDXIROBeRXJvTG6nkdUCGoXhvjCzTv2q4qUGL7QXtCp7x3lbLMTQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1624613496; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=l2flqiuymxWiwpIOqOg21ZgP2AxJsVestVkKEHZV6LM=; b=+mqaq4E6nR1JpXsEopVy0pCTYM16/w98V2Wta0DkFEeKa6X3NkOeGeibH59fX1CYQn9fjr BsuDdyofxPvlBBBg== From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira , Steven Rostedt , Phil Auld , Kate Carcia , Jonathan Corbet , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , Alexandre Chartre , Clark Willaims , John Kacur , Juri Lelli , Borislav Petkov , "H. Peter Anvin" , x86@kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 12/14] trace: Protect tr->tracing_cpumask with get/put_online_cpus Message-ID: <20210625093134.gfveikkmboywhihn@linutronix.de> References: <38d2ef13b33c42fcf424a6213a27c8b5246548e0.1624372313.git.bristot@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2021-06-25 11:27:31 [+0200], Peter Zijlstra wrote: > I'm aware this patch will go the way of the Dodo; but for future > reference, these should be spelled: cpus_read_{,un}lock(). The old names > are still around, but I suppose we should do a cleanup of that some day. I had a queue locally which I need to split further but did not get around to post it. Sebastian