All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
	Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] percpu: flush tlb after pcpu_depopulate_chunk()
Date: Sat,  3 Jul 2021 04:04:49 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210703040449.3213210-1-dennis@kernel.org> (raw)

Prior to "percpu: implement partial chunk depopulation",
pcpu_depopulate_chunk() was called only on the destruction path. This
meant the virtual address range was on its way back to vmalloc which
will handle flushing the tlbs for us.

However, now that we call pcpu_depopulate_chunk() during the active
lifecycle of a chunk, we need to flush the tlb as well otherwise we can
end up accessing the wrong page through an invalid tlb mapping.

This was reported in [1].

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210702191140.GA3166599@roeck-us.net/

Fixes: f183324133ea ("percpu: implement partial chunk depopulation")
Reported-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Signed-off-by: Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org>
---
 mm/percpu-km.c |  3 ++-
 mm/percpu-vm.c | 11 +++++++++--
 mm/percpu.c    |  7 ++++---
 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/percpu-km.c b/mm/percpu-km.c
index c9d529dc7651..6875fc3b2ed7 100644
--- a/mm/percpu-km.c
+++ b/mm/percpu-km.c
@@ -39,7 +39,8 @@ static int pcpu_populate_chunk(struct pcpu_chunk *chunk,
 }
 
 static void pcpu_depopulate_chunk(struct pcpu_chunk *chunk,
-				  int page_start, int page_end)
+				  int page_start, int page_end,
+				  bool flush_tlb)
 {
 	/* nada */
 }
diff --git a/mm/percpu-vm.c b/mm/percpu-vm.c
index ee5d89fcd66f..6353cda1718e 100644
--- a/mm/percpu-vm.c
+++ b/mm/percpu-vm.c
@@ -299,6 +299,7 @@ static int pcpu_populate_chunk(struct pcpu_chunk *chunk,
  * @chunk: chunk to depopulate
  * @page_start: the start page
  * @page_end: the end page
+ * @flush_tlb: if should we flush the tlb
  *
  * For each cpu, depopulate and unmap pages [@page_start,@page_end)
  * from @chunk.
@@ -307,7 +308,8 @@ static int pcpu_populate_chunk(struct pcpu_chunk *chunk,
  * pcpu_alloc_mutex.
  */
 static void pcpu_depopulate_chunk(struct pcpu_chunk *chunk,
-				  int page_start, int page_end)
+				  int page_start, int page_end,
+				  bool flush_tlb)
 {
 	struct page **pages;
 
@@ -324,7 +326,12 @@ static void pcpu_depopulate_chunk(struct pcpu_chunk *chunk,
 
 	pcpu_unmap_pages(chunk, pages, page_start, page_end);
 
-	/* no need to flush tlb, vmalloc will handle it lazily */
+	/*
+	 * We need to flush the tlb unless the caller will pass it to vmalloc,
+	 * which will handle flushing for us.
+	 */
+	if (flush_tlb)
+		pcpu_post_unmap_tlb_flush(chunk, page_start, page_end);
 
 	pcpu_free_pages(chunk, pages, page_start, page_end);
 }
diff --git a/mm/percpu.c b/mm/percpu.c
index b4cebeca4c0c..e23ba0d22220 100644
--- a/mm/percpu.c
+++ b/mm/percpu.c
@@ -1580,7 +1580,8 @@ static void pcpu_chunk_depopulated(struct pcpu_chunk *chunk,
 static int pcpu_populate_chunk(struct pcpu_chunk *chunk,
 			       int page_start, int page_end, gfp_t gfp);
 static void pcpu_depopulate_chunk(struct pcpu_chunk *chunk,
-				  int page_start, int page_end);
+				  int page_start, int page_end,
+				  bool flush_tlb);
 static struct pcpu_chunk *pcpu_create_chunk(gfp_t gfp);
 static void pcpu_destroy_chunk(struct pcpu_chunk *chunk);
 static struct page *pcpu_addr_to_page(void *addr);
@@ -2016,7 +2017,7 @@ static void pcpu_balance_free(bool empty_only)
 
 		bitmap_for_each_set_region(chunk->populated, rs, re, 0,
 					   chunk->nr_pages) {
-			pcpu_depopulate_chunk(chunk, rs, re);
+			pcpu_depopulate_chunk(chunk, rs, re, false);
 			spin_lock_irq(&pcpu_lock);
 			pcpu_chunk_depopulated(chunk, rs, re);
 			spin_unlock_irq(&pcpu_lock);
@@ -2189,7 +2190,7 @@ static void pcpu_reclaim_populated(void)
 				continue;
 
 			spin_unlock_irq(&pcpu_lock);
-			pcpu_depopulate_chunk(chunk, i + 1, end + 1);
+			pcpu_depopulate_chunk(chunk, i + 1, end + 1, true);
 			cond_resched();
 			spin_lock_irq(&pcpu_lock);
 
-- 
2.32.0.93.g670b81a890-goog


             reply	other threads:[~2021-07-03  4:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-03  4:04 Dennis Zhou [this message]
2021-07-03  5:14 [PATCH] percpu: flush tlb after pcpu_depopulate_chunk() Guenter Roeck
2021-07-03  5:25 ` Dennis Zhou
2021-07-03 16:57   ` Dennis Zhou

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210703040449.3213210-1-dennis@kernel.org \
    --to=dennis@kernel.org \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.