From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D91A5C07E98 for ; Mon, 5 Jul 2021 07:35:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.xenproject.org (lists.xenproject.org [192.237.175.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 95289611ED for ; Mon, 5 Jul 2021 07:35:55 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 95289611ED Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=aepfle.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Received: from list by lists.xenproject.org with outflank-mailman.149816.277095 (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1m0J8n-0002av-Uu; Mon, 05 Jul 2021 07:35:41 +0000 X-Outflank-Mailman: Message body and most headers restored to incoming version Received: by outflank-mailman (output) from mailman id 149816.277095; Mon, 05 Jul 2021 07:35:41 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xenproject.org) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1m0J8n-0002ao-QF; Mon, 05 Jul 2021 07:35:41 +0000 Received: by outflank-mailman (input) for mailman id 149816; Mon, 05 Jul 2021 07:35:40 +0000 Received: from all-amaz-eas1.inumbo.com ([34.197.232.57] helo=us1-amaz-eas2.inumbo.com) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1m0J8m-0002ai-AT for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Mon, 05 Jul 2021 07:35:40 +0000 Received: from mo4-p00-ob.smtp.rzone.de (unknown [81.169.146.217]) by us1-amaz-eas2.inumbo.com (Halon) with ESMTPS id 98152248-dd63-11eb-843e-12813bfff9fa; Mon, 05 Jul 2021 07:35:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sender by smtp.strato.de (RZmta 47.28.1 AUTH) with ESMTPSA id 30791cx657ZWKQR (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate); Mon, 5 Jul 2021 09:35:32 +0200 (CEST) X-BeenThere: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org List-Id: Xen developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Precedence: list Sender: "Xen-devel" X-Inumbo-ID: 98152248-dd63-11eb-843e-12813bfff9fa DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1625470532; s=strato-dkim-0002; d=aepfle.de; h=References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Cc:Date: From:Subject:Sender; bh=iwAZHz+bN1CxIaMVu8XWz95smJ4SdKtO2YuzCZDyDc0=; b=JRbSzXG4HwjR5Ey1z38rVJaZiZMc0Rcklf6cr/BcvNqk1Rv7v96MWvyFvJ9As6T5AT Vim1kUjv7P7DW6eUVoAhR14zCfyhLGYHVejdCvwiCflKE09RkbS6LyYspS0mrWlblZ5X QfVbV7YGprdQ4m+M8qFsAxZcfgVPhkTOmqg5uA5WeKdHH4s+QEtS1/AKtDGANzg9g4pz 6kNCR/GqlXYZIWIG2kUUtDYj0oErkeb/TMcfNRxiwltYScXnZHoj3a27OR7t6nueE6Ut Ct/PAb57hx24/s2jFKjR1nOf1raRISodq6fmueuyrETnZ+NT6TYASSrRTfCNyyutlXkN lXaQ== Authentication-Results: strato.com; dkim=none X-RZG-AUTH: ":P2EQZWCpfu+qG7CngxMFH1J+3q8wa/QLpd5ylWvMDX3y/OuD5rXVisF+Ax6FOE3sSy9BcWAcR/hQoAs9MGk67vg1baqX" X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo00 Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2021 09:35:14 +0200 From: Olaf Hering To: Andrew Cooper Cc: Xen-devel , Jan Beulich , Roger Pau =?UTF-8?B?TW9ubsOp?= , Wei Liu , Ian Jackson Subject: Re: [PATCH] tools/libxenguest: Fix max_extd_leaf calculation for legacy restore Message-ID: <20210705093514.45be9be8.olaf@aepfle.de> In-Reply-To: <20210702190334.31271-1-andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> References: <20210702190334.31271-1-andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2021.05.27 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-suse-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/JbMqPY3W6G1h2t=4_+wlXLO"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256 --Sig_/JbMqPY3W6G1h2t=4_+wlXLO Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am Fri, 2 Jul 2021 20:03:34 +0100 schrieb Andrew Cooper : > Fixes: 34990446ca91 ("libxl: don't ignore the return value from xc_cpuid_= apply_policy") I think it fixes 111c8c33a8a18588f3da3c5dbb7f5c63ddb98ce5 ("x86/cpuid: do n= ot expand max leaves on restore"), 34990446ca91 just revealed the bug? Either way, this new variant is what I had tested last week. But with a tra= iling "u" for the constant. This detail may not make a difference in practi= ce. Olaf --Sig_/JbMqPY3W6G1h2t=4_+wlXLO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEE97o7Um30LT3B+5b/86SN7mm1DoAFAmDitjIACgkQ86SN7mm1 DoAnjBAAiRZuQDEjjVhMLjPjG3ICG49Zl+hTzwfvwXHmJW54vN+/LQJjoIcNVrhB 0cS1ZPwZ43fbB8aR5/3m5fcNfRAnDcCGF3obEilhubYuQ7TLVGEpC0Wb/0kYkvsF uB3HrWlUYWFlq0+FUYtl99rHgahcAKx+nA9C2Ak9clm8eTwkLKRpc42KE6SqZ467 nc93wXGn+YJJfBPLM6L8jMF9jW7e8Ia8WZIgCJlQNftQ87ofDHMLRK1By/8555Ns ZI2qJ/eAd4WFnjFdLlw/LRgNZgNlYcKSPuYnyuezTYn0DzP3yLdl013GeCmry64N rMwepRTrNVPNkNTAc4Hwi63X6mwmBud+tTK+Z3uHhT5cTHDwk61Cs1rqRbaAZ2AV dJsa01rg+ptYPfp3+Xu4sQG2j3KfAhU99DzkrpNi7xP2Yrkxt3vylAbVzi0VSkEQ z3h4oXqBLgti5lz/OOZBYUeEv08VZ+klmuj7pLRUb3nuEkgasOeFYP9ozjYF+cL4 JjFshN6aYcKiaG8DaUvWtqPt5VSgrvP5+f88TzuzG0I0v+7yML6h6j9oAmdeIwf3 2H8/jieUgeRksq0oywpI1gRCl6k/eMtWGwHxPstegrWw4RrnYWTVH+LvQ3da/JGa wQhTdn2Ovnil36HgGuQ0VTpeKgVqNjTDOBg+0MSturiRty7lRVE= =qeNW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/JbMqPY3W6G1h2t=4_+wlXLO--