From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E02DC07E96 for ; Tue, 6 Jul 2021 08:37:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48C9E61997 for ; Tue, 6 Jul 2021 08:37:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230440AbhGFIkY (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jul 2021 04:40:24 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:36154 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230439AbhGFIkY (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jul 2021 04:40:24 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-x42d.google.com (mail-pf1-x42d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42d]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5DEFCC061574 for ; Tue, 6 Jul 2021 01:37:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pf1-x42d.google.com with SMTP id w22so15184167pff.5 for ; Tue, 06 Jul 2021 01:37:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=sWgvKKd9osi8SGdjen6Va73AEJitP6PkOyyL250Hc5U=; b=q6MSDnZJwF/Jm8J6jWqoXAzm9qMDznp9uzk2mBfuzMVf9itme1DOpOH6m+ANt3ety4 Z/TTE9gMa3hzCbc2Qn/DGXQ+kUqyIa3UOJ4OGajH73Zas+2Sv9O9xij6FDrfKuBt7d/i wucuBWSxxSENcgfQF5g4s/U6ZeXaWf225NntXDekKGQDl7k+EuC4bKbYgxolltNXv0Wo 9u+t0DBlMunLH/jVYpbxGWSsXi3swlggjBYoQfTYIQcuf85Ur1oN7zjAnbSoy8MZow9Q mQTrOH6Md0i2sKrF0hc5fyPudAkuJU9ECb8/mFFPrdyedNy3j0Q2v8jVo+XVELl5xF0H 7r/A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=sWgvKKd9osi8SGdjen6Va73AEJitP6PkOyyL250Hc5U=; b=sEJ/xz+B2M6pIKajgtr6l272/y+rBonDCnOBTjarhP70Mad2XiZEO3RVd7oss0faIw cARUOdTk7j+jZBx1jByzb7afTsH/27zuosIncyEWKgDetDwOu5SM87zhyBMpoo+RdOz2 PlOsFrcFOvJBcfHFiM/g6sbDpOgYPuOGtDpk9xQaNv5VfLz+KyjknA7iCw77D38PlYxd pFhNNiewzQ+sE9JVOBld0AWHHHDe6L+lGXysg7EsW6O6i384yyH/AYNhKl1VeZhdEZv3 v0zKaJk47C0xrMRocffMuRBEL9KVZBqDKyB4UAs8g0H+26R+70tXQpEAuTl07C25uuPM yoLQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533tyHLa5b8B49ZSZ6c9Va8suKY1ljmeKmJpEaNppERj8WwMPafh nygV3oux9OEXNCJsF8Wvq3da3A== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxs3itQvh1azP21+EUk9rXUx2ynOcj9yWBpwHAbOl1Nx3W3Nej1n/H1zfYciD/DJZc4UO/OxA== X-Received: by 2002:a63:4302:: with SMTP id q2mr19779873pga.428.1625560664263; Tue, 06 Jul 2021 01:37:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([106.201.108.2]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y3sm18250013pga.72.2021.07.06.01.37.42 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 06 Jul 2021 01:37:43 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2021 14:07:41 +0530 From: Viresh Kumar To: Vincent Donnefort Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Lukasz Luba , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Peter Zijlstra , Vincent Guittot , Quentin Perret , Linux PM , Ionela Voinescu , Dietmar Eggemann Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/6] cpufreq: Add an interface to mark inefficient frequencies Message-ID: <20210706083741.2ihy6wf6bfff6lvs@vireshk-i7> References: <20210616105327.wnppsau4gg5ihrlv@vireshk-i7> <4d975236-943c-ea82-547b-04f2bead9f48@arm.com> <0a930559-a648-c20d-f3f6-09e4974a031d@arm.com> <20210702191658.GA30379@e120877-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <20210706081256.GA216826@e120877-lin.cambridge.arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210706081256.GA216826@e120877-lin.cambridge.arm.com> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716-391-311a52 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On 06-07-21, 09:12, Vincent Donnefort wrote: > Of course, I can implement this instead of a cpufreq_policy flag in v4. Why should this ever be a policy flag and not governor's flag ? -- viresh