From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16675C07E96 for ; Tue, 6 Jul 2021 08:50:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEAEC61995 for ; Tue, 6 Jul 2021 08:50:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230427AbhGFIxV (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jul 2021 04:53:21 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:39040 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230295AbhGFIxV (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jul 2021 04:53:21 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-x52f.google.com (mail-pg1-x52f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52f]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C74B8C061574 for ; Tue, 6 Jul 2021 01:50:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pg1-x52f.google.com with SMTP id 62so12653667pgf.1 for ; Tue, 06 Jul 2021 01:50:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=p1u5Zxt+S039hPvzr3f6QxZq1mwtH1pk7RV6pkg6rpI=; b=JGmQ8HTKmWfUcVb6Tjlaym8ZXNNqhl8XclE5ucx2tdYSQFD1vOnge/1A58114OLYTX 2Ki52SvUfPS/NA5ppiihLQoCKP2+8mTXnVx39CDgx3NIzoJzlnN8OblYa6I4BZLCu0Zn S0Tzjkv28rKuQtrc6nQiGzzn4hZd8X4eVPZ/XDB32ONHsSq2o7Cw5j4UWd0X2HhUeIcM X9FMLkIDlNMhQKMg2lqWnbkNhX0K7htD84960in/hTRxMzkXAZfH48Ke3t24dqPzVn0H kB60/KPUbmEuNVyrvyXGaqB4x83SMzGy00WZd1X6cKXum6KoX5m9po9CmZqb9zsKb0ia o2Vg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=p1u5Zxt+S039hPvzr3f6QxZq1mwtH1pk7RV6pkg6rpI=; b=EzHkgwddhRGTyiwx/RYpXFON3qkTTqDpgcE5MMxU8pnGZt1NJvdI2V7glUHdwED3X9 AR92cgzMXqrDpWZm6SkdCC0OVLWcYbaxVz3NEUmXjwd0jrBWa2WSr8VXAzgtRHwr6EVq nkvZsJmvBTjHHny1Xqk5TWVjQHQtQVXO+7MQR+nrk15pne6J88Yi7q2gJhfDaadbRZnj 2pYx46n3ejpNZe9Hg4tOfkZYO4AqxUg44qntF1M7yNVhrU4s9/HKODimie45TpTvuK9j QmBx8wAhRkI8CHBLxPgp6VdrUn1TClPkO381DrZRDcjQIl4w//K7ONva/bRHSaDiyUNI ELzA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5312n/ynuqkI4U7Cb2duIF8eJ6h5mboYdanfwOC4cgQYKkXOhIeH HtxVw33VpDHRUrvCYt8oTofDWw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxE/7NO5LH7QBGGkgcrZerj7gCBRizvAyElo6+YVtSQP3WxcTDgBtBVSGjB/H9bVjmdBbC12A== X-Received: by 2002:a63:580c:: with SMTP id m12mr6257841pgb.157.1625561442314; Tue, 06 Jul 2021 01:50:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([106.201.108.2]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y4sm17170775pfc.15.2021.07.06.01.50.41 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 06 Jul 2021 01:50:41 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2021 14:20:39 +0530 From: Viresh Kumar To: Vincent Donnefort Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Lukasz Luba , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Peter Zijlstra , Vincent Guittot , Quentin Perret , Linux PM , Ionela Voinescu , Dietmar Eggemann Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/6] cpufreq: Add an interface to mark inefficient frequencies Message-ID: <20210706085039.eb7wzc2dpnd2v6yo@vireshk-i7> References: <0a930559-a648-c20d-f3f6-09e4974a031d@arm.com> <20210702191658.GA30379@e120877-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <20210706081256.GA216826@e120877-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <20210706083741.2ihy6wf6bfff6lvs@vireshk-i7> <20210706084312.GA219414@e120877-lin.cambridge.arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210706084312.GA219414@e120877-lin.cambridge.arm.com> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716-391-311a52 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On 06-07-21, 09:43, Vincent Donnefort wrote: > I was referring to how letting know a driver which registers ->target() that we > want or not inefficient frequencies. My proposal was to rely on a > cpufreq_policy's flag that the driver can read. I am bit confused at this point, lets see how it looks eventually as patches :) -- viresh