All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo@jmondi.org>
To: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se>
Cc: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl>,
	linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/11] rcar-vin: Improve async notifier cleanup paths
Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2021 18:41:39 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210706164139.as5hc32dt463fwit@uno.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210413180253.2575451-4-niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se>

Hi Niklas

On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 08:02:45PM +0200, Niklas Söderlund wrote:
> The cleanup code for the async notifiers can be refactored to own
> functions to reduce code duplication and improve readability. While at
> it rename the CSI-2 initialization function _csi2_ instead of _mc_ to
> match.
>
> Signed-off-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se>
> ---
>  drivers/media/platform/rcar-vin/rcar-core.c | 51 ++++++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/rcar-vin/rcar-core.c b/drivers/media/platform/rcar-vin/rcar-core.c
> index d4932f7b42647ee1..da23d55aa72b7f0d 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/rcar-vin/rcar-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/rcar-vin/rcar-core.c
> @@ -383,6 +383,16 @@ static void rvin_group_put(struct rvin_dev *vin)
>  	kref_put(&group->refcount, rvin_group_release);
>  }
>
> +static void rvin_group_notifier_cleanup(struct rvin_dev *vin)
> +{
> +	mutex_lock(&vin->group->lock);
> +	if (&vin->v4l2_dev == vin->group->notifier.v4l2_dev) {
> +		v4l2_async_notifier_unregister(&vin->group->notifier);
> +		v4l2_async_notifier_cleanup(&vin->group->notifier);
> +	}
> +	mutex_unlock(&vin->group->lock);
> +}
> +
>  /* -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>   * Controls
>   */
> @@ -676,6 +686,12 @@ static int rvin_parallel_parse_of(struct rvin_dev *vin)
>  	return ret;
>  }
>
> +static void rvin_parallel_cleanup(struct rvin_dev *vin)
> +{
> +	v4l2_async_notifier_unregister(&vin->notifier);
> +	v4l2_async_notifier_cleanup(&vin->notifier);
> +}
> +
>  static int rvin_parallel_init(struct rvin_dev *vin)
>  {
>  	int ret;
> @@ -937,7 +953,16 @@ static int rvin_mc_parse_of_graph(struct rvin_dev *vin)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>
> -static int rvin_mc_init(struct rvin_dev *vin)
> +static void rvin_csi2_cleanup(struct rvin_dev *vin)
> +{
> +	if (!vin->info->use_mc)
> +		return;
> +
> +	rvin_group_notifier_cleanup(vin);
> +	rvin_group_put(vin);
> +}
> +
> +static int rvin_csi2_init(struct rvin_dev *vin)
>  {
>  	int ret;
>
> @@ -1445,7 +1470,7 @@ static int rcar_vin_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, vin);
>
>  	if (vin->info->use_mc) {
> -		ret = rvin_mc_init(vin);
> +		ret = rvin_csi2_init(vin);
>  		if (ret)
>  			goto error_dma_unregister;
>  	}
> @@ -1458,20 +1483,9 @@ static int rcar_vin_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	pm_runtime_enable(&pdev->dev);
>
>  	return 0;
> -

Intentional ?

Reviewed-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@jmondi.org>

Thanks
   j

>  error_group_unregister:
>  	rvin_free_controls(vin);
> -
> -	if (vin->info->use_mc) {
> -		mutex_lock(&vin->group->lock);
> -		if (&vin->v4l2_dev == vin->group->notifier.v4l2_dev) {
> -			v4l2_async_notifier_unregister(&vin->group->notifier);
> -			v4l2_async_notifier_cleanup(&vin->group->notifier);
> -		}
> -		mutex_unlock(&vin->group->lock);
> -		rvin_group_put(vin);
> -	}
> -
> +	rvin_csi2_cleanup(vin);
>  error_dma_unregister:
>  	rvin_dma_unregister(vin);
>
> @@ -1486,14 +1500,9 @@ static int rcar_vin_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
>  	rvin_v4l2_unregister(vin);
>
> -	v4l2_async_notifier_unregister(&vin->notifier);
> -	v4l2_async_notifier_cleanup(&vin->notifier);
> +	rvin_parallel_cleanup(vin);
>
> -	if (vin->info->use_mc) {
> -		v4l2_async_notifier_unregister(&vin->group->notifier);
> -		v4l2_async_notifier_cleanup(&vin->group->notifier);
> -		rvin_group_put(vin);
> -	}
> +	rvin_csi2_cleanup(vin);
>
>  	rvin_free_controls(vin);
>
> --
> 2.31.1
>

  reply	other threads:[~2021-07-06 16:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-13 18:02 [PATCH 00/11] rcar-vin: Add r8a779a0 support Niklas Söderlund
2021-04-13 18:02 ` [PATCH 01/11] rcar-vin: Refactor controls creation for video device Niklas Söderlund
2021-07-06 16:04   ` Jacopo Mondi
2021-07-06 16:16     ` Niklas Söderlund
2021-07-06 16:58       ` Jacopo Mondi
2021-07-08 13:40         ` Sakari Ailus
2021-07-08 14:05           ` Niklas Söderlund
2021-07-08 14:42             ` Sakari Ailus
2021-07-06 16:08   ` Jacopo Mondi
2021-07-06 16:17     ` Niklas Söderlund
2021-04-13 18:02 ` [PATCH 02/11] rcar-vin: Fix error paths for rvin_mc_init() Niklas Söderlund
2021-07-06 16:09   ` Jacopo Mondi
2021-04-13 18:02 ` [PATCH 03/11] rcar-vin: Improve async notifier cleanup paths Niklas Söderlund
2021-07-06 16:41   ` Jacopo Mondi [this message]
2021-04-13 18:02 ` [PATCH 04/11] rcar-vin: Improve reuse of parallel notifier Niklas Söderlund
2021-07-06 16:51   ` Jacopo Mondi
2021-07-07  8:51     ` Niklas Söderlund
2021-04-13 18:02 ` [PATCH 05/11] rcar-vin: Rename array storing subdevice information Niklas Söderlund
2021-07-06 16:53   ` Jacopo Mondi
2021-04-13 18:02 ` [PATCH 06/11] rcar-vin: Move group async notifier Niklas Söderlund
2021-07-06 16:58   ` Jacopo Mondi
2021-04-13 18:02 ` [PATCH 07/11] rcar-vin: Extend group notifier DT parser to work with any port Niklas Söderlund
2021-07-07 10:24   ` Jacopo Mondi
2021-04-13 18:02 ` [PATCH 08/11] rcar-vin: Create a callback to setup media links Niklas Söderlund
2021-07-07 10:33   ` Jacopo Mondi
2021-07-08 15:46     ` Niklas Söderlund
2021-04-13 18:02 ` [PATCH 09/11] rcar-vin: Specify media device ops at group creation time Niklas Söderlund
2021-07-07 10:40   ` Jacopo Mondi
2021-04-13 18:02 ` [PATCH 10/11] rcar-vin: Move and rename CSI-2 link notifications Niklas Söderlund
2021-07-07 10:46   ` Jacopo Mondi
2021-04-13 18:02 ` [PATCH 11/11] rcar-vin: Add r8a779a0 support Niklas Söderlund
2021-07-07 11:09   ` Jacopo Mondi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210706164139.as5hc32dt463fwit@uno.localdomain \
    --to=jacopo@jmondi.org \
    --cc=hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH 03/11] rcar-vin: Improve async notifier cleanup paths' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.