[merged] ipc-sem-use-kvmalloc-for-sem_undo-allocation.patch removed from -mm tree

[merged] ipc-sem-use-kvmalloc-for-sem_undo-allocation.patch removed from -mm tree

[akpm]

The patch titled
     Subject: ipc sem: use kvmalloc for sem_undo allocation
has been removed from the -mm tree.  Its filename was
     ipc-sem-use-kvmalloc-for-sem_undo-allocation.patch

This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree

------------------------------------------------------
From: Vasily Averin <vvs@virtuozzo.com>
Subject: ipc sem: use kvmalloc for sem_undo allocation

Patch series "ipc: allocations cleanup", v2.

Some ipc objects use the wrong allocation functions: small objects can use
kmalloc(), and vice versa, potentially large objects can use kmalloc().


This patch (of 2):

Size of sem_undo can exceed one page and with the maximum possible nsems =
32000 it can grow up to 64Kb.  Let's switch its allocation to kvmalloc to
avoid user-triggered disruptive actions like OOM killer in case of
high-order memory shortage.

User triggerable high order allocations are quite a problem on heavily
fragmented systems.  They can be a DoS vector.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/ebc3ac79-3190-520d-81ce-22ad194986ec@virtuozzo.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/a6354fd9-2d55-2e63-dd4d-fa7dc1d11134@virtuozzo.com
Signed-off-by: Vasily Averin <vvs@virtuozzo.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Acked-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Cc: Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@gmail.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>
Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---

 ipc/sem.c |   11 ++++++-----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

--- a/ipc/sem.c~ipc-sem-use-kvmalloc-for-sem_undo-allocation
+++ a/ipc/sem.c
@@ -1154,7 +1154,7 @@ static void freeary(struct ipc_namespace
 		un->semid = -1;
 		list_del_rcu(&un->list_proc);
 		spin_unlock(&un->ulp->lock);
-		kfree_rcu(un, rcu);
+		kvfree_rcu(un, rcu);
 	}
 
 	/* Wake up all pending processes and let them fail with EIDRM. */
@@ -1937,7 +1937,8 @@ static struct sem_undo *find_alloc_undo(
 	rcu_read_unlock();
 
 	/* step 2: allocate new undo structure */
-	new = kzalloc(sizeof(struct sem_undo) + sizeof(short)*nsems, GFP_KERNEL);
+	new = kvzalloc(sizeof(struct sem_undo) + sizeof(short)*nsems,
+		       GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!new) {
 		ipc_rcu_putref(&sma->sem_perm, sem_rcu_free);
 		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
@@ -1949,7 +1950,7 @@ static struct sem_undo *find_alloc_undo(
 	if (!ipc_valid_object(&sma->sem_perm)) {
 		sem_unlock(sma, -1);
 		rcu_read_unlock();
-		kfree(new);
+		kvfree(new);
 		un = ERR_PTR(-EIDRM);
 		goto out;
 	}
@@ -1960,7 +1961,7 @@ static struct sem_undo *find_alloc_undo(
 	 */
 	un = lookup_undo(ulp, semid);
 	if (un) {
-		kfree(new);
+		kvfree(new);
 		goto success;
 	}
 	/* step 5: initialize & link new undo structure */
@@ -2420,7 +2421,7 @@ void exit_sem(struct task_struct *tsk)
 		rcu_read_unlock();
 		wake_up_q(&wake_q);
 
-		kfree_rcu(un, rcu);
+		kvfree_rcu(un, rcu);
 	}
 	kfree(ulp);
 }
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from vvs@virtuozzo.com are