From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AF4DC07E96 for ; Tue, 6 Jul 2021 17:18:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F389C61C5B for ; Tue, 6 Jul 2021 17:18:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230398AbhGFRUj (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jul 2021 13:20:39 -0400 Received: from relay.sw.ru ([185.231.240.75]:60982 "EHLO relay.sw.ru" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230389AbhGFRUi (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jul 2021 13:20:38 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=virtuozzo.com; s=relay; h=Content-Type:Mime-Version:Message-Id:Subject:From :Date; bh=MCHOi6ZEh59hnCa9zu4iiaV7gFv1WZns08qoIFW3r0o=; b=dXoV4CNfBGHNNNIoX8x yxPqT/PFSg5kjkdOspHIkBvebXBQW1ENcRjD6TXOQfVHiozOxX3I2wfWJ3iTkkX4ZrCAPqMzUEo2N 5+129pcqzWy0kPDJOT9tfd+nmrMDSWuHyJZVCYxbRZ7zmq4azwbPoafDWfilC3RzJbGe7PEXfhY=; Received: from [192.168.15.199] (helo=mikhalitsyn-laptop) by relay.sw.ru with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1m0ohp-0036Rj-Kw; Tue, 06 Jul 2021 20:17:57 +0300 Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2021 20:17:57 +0300 From: Alexander Mikhalitsyn To: Stephen Hemminger Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, David Ahern , Andrei Vagin , Alexander Mikhalitsyn Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 iproute2] ip route: ignore ENOENT during save if RT_TABLE_MAIN is being dumped Message-Id: <20210706201757.46678b763f35ae41a12f48c1@virtuozzo.com> In-Reply-To: <20210706091821.7a5c2ce8@hermes.local> References: <20210625104441.37756-1-alexander.mikhalitsyn@virtuozzo.com> <20210629155116.23464-1-alexander.mikhalitsyn@virtuozzo.com> <20210706083407.76deb4c0@hermes.local> <20210706184415.baf59983a9cb5de56050389c@virtuozzo.com> <20210706091821.7a5c2ce8@hermes.local> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 6 Jul 2021 09:18:21 -0700 Stephen Hemminger wrote: > On Tue, 6 Jul 2021 18:44:15 +0300 > Alexander Mikhalitsyn wrote: > > > On Tue, 6 Jul 2021 08:34:07 -0700 > > Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 29 Jun 2021 18:51:15 +0300 > > > Alexander Mikhalitsyn wrote: > > > > > > > + const struct rtnl_dump_filter_arg a[2] = { > > > > + { .filter = filter, .arg1 = arg1, > > > > + .errhndlr = errhndlr, .arg2 = arg2, .nc_flags = nc_flags, }, > > > > + { .filter = NULL, .arg1 = NULL, > > > > + .errhndlr = NULL, .arg2 = NULL, .nc_flags = 0, }, > > > > }; > > > > > > I am OK with this as is. But you don't need to add initializers for fields > > > that are 0/NULL (at least in C). > > > > Sure, I've made such explicit initializations just because in original > > rtnl_dump_filter_nc() we already have them. > > > > Do I need to resend with fixed initializations? ;) > > Not worth it Ok, thanks!