All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Christian König" <ckoenig.leichtzumerken@gmail.com>
To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, roberto.sassu@huawei.com
Subject: [PATCH] dma-buf: fix and rework dma_buf_poll v5
Date: Thu,  8 Jul 2021 13:19:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210708111916.7291-1-christian.koenig@amd.com> (raw)

Daniel pointed me towards this function and there are multiple obvious problems
in the implementation.

First of all the retry loop is not working as intended. In general the retry
makes only sense if you grab the reference first and then check the sequence
values.

Then we should always also wait for the exclusive fence.

It's also good practice to keep the reference around when installing callbacks
to fences you don't own.

And last the whole implementation was unnecessary complex and rather hard to
understand which could lead to probably unexpected behavior of the IOCTL.

Fix all this by reworking the implementation from scratch. Dropping the
whole RCU approach and taking the lock instead.

Only mildly tested and needs a thoughtful review of the code.

v2: fix the reference counting as well
v3: keep the excl fence handling as is for stable
v4: back to testing all fences, drop RCU
v5: handle in and out separately

Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org
---
 drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c | 152 +++++++++++++++++---------------------
 include/linux/dma-buf.h   |   2 +-
 2 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 86 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
index eadd1eaa2fb5..439e2379e1cb 100644
--- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
+++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ static void dma_buf_release(struct dentry *dentry)
 	 * If you hit this BUG() it means someone dropped their ref to the
 	 * dma-buf while still having pending operation to the buffer.
 	 */
-	BUG_ON(dmabuf->cb_shared.active || dmabuf->cb_excl.active);
+	BUG_ON(dmabuf->cb_in.active || dmabuf->cb_out.active);
 
 	dmabuf->ops->release(dmabuf);
 
@@ -202,16 +202,57 @@ static void dma_buf_poll_cb(struct dma_fence *fence, struct dma_fence_cb *cb)
 	wake_up_locked_poll(dcb->poll, dcb->active);
 	dcb->active = 0;
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dcb->poll->lock, flags);
+	dma_fence_put(fence);
+}
+
+static bool dma_buf_poll_shared(struct dma_resv *resv,
+				struct dma_buf_poll_cb_t *dcb)
+{
+	struct dma_resv_list *fobj = dma_resv_get_list(resv);
+	struct dma_fence *fence;
+	int i, r;
+
+	if (!fobj)
+		return false;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < fobj->shared_count; ++i) {
+		fence = rcu_dereference_protected(fobj->shared[i],
+						  dma_resv_held(resv));
+		dma_fence_get(fence);
+		r = dma_fence_add_callback(fence, &dcb->cb, dma_buf_poll_cb);
+		if (!r)
+			return true;
+		dma_fence_put(fence);
+	}
+
+	return false;
+}
+
+static bool dma_buf_poll_excl(struct dma_resv *resv,
+			      struct dma_buf_poll_cb_t *dcb)
+{
+	struct dma_fence *fence = dma_resv_get_excl(resv);
+	int r;
+
+	if (!fence)
+		return false;
+
+	dma_fence_get(fence);
+	r = dma_fence_add_callback(fence, &dcb->cb, dma_buf_poll_cb);
+	if (!r)
+		return true;
+	dma_fence_put(fence);
+
+	return false;
 }
 
 static __poll_t dma_buf_poll(struct file *file, poll_table *poll)
 {
 	struct dma_buf *dmabuf;
 	struct dma_resv *resv;
-	struct dma_resv_list *fobj;
-	struct dma_fence *fence_excl;
+	unsigned shared_count;
 	__poll_t events;
-	unsigned shared_count, seq;
+	int r, i;
 
 	dmabuf = file->private_data;
 	if (!dmabuf || !dmabuf->resv)
@@ -225,101 +266,42 @@ static __poll_t dma_buf_poll(struct file *file, poll_table *poll)
 	if (!events)
 		return 0;
 
-retry:
-	seq = read_seqcount_begin(&resv->seq);
-	rcu_read_lock();
-
-	fobj = rcu_dereference(resv->fence);
-	if (fobj)
-		shared_count = fobj->shared_count;
-	else
-		shared_count = 0;
-	fence_excl = rcu_dereference(resv->fence_excl);
-	if (read_seqcount_retry(&resv->seq, seq)) {
-		rcu_read_unlock();
-		goto retry;
-	}
-
-	if (fence_excl && (!(events & EPOLLOUT) || shared_count == 0)) {
-		struct dma_buf_poll_cb_t *dcb = &dmabuf->cb_excl;
-		__poll_t pevents = EPOLLIN;
+	dma_resv_lock(resv, NULL);
 
-		if (shared_count == 0)
-			pevents |= EPOLLOUT;
+	if (events & EPOLLOUT) {
+		struct dma_buf_poll_cb_t *dcb = &dmabuf->cb_out;
 
+		/* Check that callback isn't busy */
 		spin_lock_irq(&dmabuf->poll.lock);
-		if (dcb->active) {
-			dcb->active |= pevents;
-			events &= ~pevents;
-		} else
-			dcb->active = pevents;
+		if (dcb->active)
+			events &= ~EPOLLOUT;
+		else
+			dcb->active = EPOLLOUT;
 		spin_unlock_irq(&dmabuf->poll.lock);
 
-		if (events & pevents) {
-			if (!dma_fence_get_rcu(fence_excl)) {
-				/* force a recheck */
-				events &= ~pevents;
-				dma_buf_poll_cb(NULL, &dcb->cb);
-			} else if (!dma_fence_add_callback(fence_excl, &dcb->cb,
-							   dma_buf_poll_cb)) {
-				events &= ~pevents;
-				dma_fence_put(fence_excl);
-			} else {
-				/*
-				 * No callback queued, wake up any additional
-				 * waiters.
-				 */
-				dma_fence_put(fence_excl);
-				dma_buf_poll_cb(NULL, &dcb->cb);
-			}
-		}
+		if (events & EPOLLOUT && !dma_buf_poll_shared(resv, dcb) &&
+		    !dma_buf_poll_excl(resv, dcb))
+			/* No callback queued, wake up any other waiters */
+			dma_buf_poll_cb(NULL, &dcb->cb);
 	}
 
-	if ((events & EPOLLOUT) && shared_count > 0) {
-		struct dma_buf_poll_cb_t *dcb = &dmabuf->cb_shared;
-		int i;
+	if (events & EPOLLIN) {
+		struct dma_buf_poll_cb_t *dcb = &dmabuf->cb_in;
 
-		/* Only queue a new callback if no event has fired yet */
+		/* Check that callback isn't busy */
 		spin_lock_irq(&dmabuf->poll.lock);
 		if (dcb->active)
-			events &= ~EPOLLOUT;
+			events &= ~EPOLLIN;
 		else
-			dcb->active = EPOLLOUT;
+			dcb->active = EPOLLIN;
 		spin_unlock_irq(&dmabuf->poll.lock);
 
-		if (!(events & EPOLLOUT))
-			goto out;
-
-		for (i = 0; i < shared_count; ++i) {
-			struct dma_fence *fence = rcu_dereference(fobj->shared[i]);
-
-			if (!dma_fence_get_rcu(fence)) {
-				/*
-				 * fence refcount dropped to zero, this means
-				 * that fobj has been freed
-				 *
-				 * call dma_buf_poll_cb and force a recheck!
-				 */
-				events &= ~EPOLLOUT;
-				dma_buf_poll_cb(NULL, &dcb->cb);
-				break;
-			}
-			if (!dma_fence_add_callback(fence, &dcb->cb,
-						    dma_buf_poll_cb)) {
-				dma_fence_put(fence);
-				events &= ~EPOLLOUT;
-				break;
-			}
-			dma_fence_put(fence);
-		}
-
-		/* No callback queued, wake up any additional waiters. */
-		if (i == shared_count)
+		if (events & EPOLLIN && !dma_buf_poll_excl(resv, dcb))
+			/* No callback queued, wake up any other waiters */
 			dma_buf_poll_cb(NULL, &dcb->cb);
 	}
 
-out:
-	rcu_read_unlock();
+	dma_resv_unlock(resv);
 	return events;
 }
 
@@ -562,8 +544,8 @@ struct dma_buf *dma_buf_export(const struct dma_buf_export_info *exp_info)
 	dmabuf->owner = exp_info->owner;
 	spin_lock_init(&dmabuf->name_lock);
 	init_waitqueue_head(&dmabuf->poll);
-	dmabuf->cb_excl.poll = dmabuf->cb_shared.poll = &dmabuf->poll;
-	dmabuf->cb_excl.active = dmabuf->cb_shared.active = 0;
+	dmabuf->cb_in.poll = dmabuf->cb_out.poll = &dmabuf->poll;
+	dmabuf->cb_in.active = dmabuf->cb_out.active = 0;
 
 	if (!resv) {
 		resv = (struct dma_resv *)&dmabuf[1];
diff --git a/include/linux/dma-buf.h b/include/linux/dma-buf.h
index efdc56b9d95f..7e747ad54c81 100644
--- a/include/linux/dma-buf.h
+++ b/include/linux/dma-buf.h
@@ -329,7 +329,7 @@ struct dma_buf {
 		wait_queue_head_t *poll;
 
 		__poll_t active;
-	} cb_excl, cb_shared;
+	} cb_in, cb_out;
 };
 
 /**
-- 
2.25.1


             reply	other threads:[~2021-07-08 11:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-08 11:19 Christian König [this message]
2021-07-08 11:41 ` [PATCH] dma-buf: fix and rework dma_buf_poll v5 Christian König
2021-07-09 12:50 ` kernel test robot
2021-07-09 12:50   ` kernel test robot
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-07-02 16:00 kernel test robot
2021-07-02 10:31 Christian König
2021-07-02 19:45 ` Daniel Vetter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210708111916.7291-1-christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --to=ckoenig.leichtzumerken@gmail.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=roberto.sassu@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.