All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v2] drivers:edac: Use DEVICE_ATTR helper macros
@ 2021-07-11 14:10 ` Dwaipayan Ray
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Dwaipayan Ray @ 2021-07-11 14:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: yazen.ghannam, bp, mchehab, tony.luck, james.morse, rric
  Cc: lukas.bulwahn, kbuild-all, linux-edac, linux-kernel, lkp, Dwaipayan Ray

Instead of "open coding" DEVICE_ATTR, use the corresponding
helper macros DEVICE_ATTR_{RW,RO_WO} in amd64_edac.c

Some function names needed to be changed to match the device
conventions <foo>_show and <foo>_store, but the functionality
itself is unchanged.

The devices using EDAC_DCT_ATTR_SHOW() are left unchanged.

Signed-off-by: Dwaipayan Ray <dwaipayanray1@gmail.com>
---

Changes in v2:
- Revert back the device name changes which broke
  the kernel. These were using the macro EDAC_DCT_ATTR_SHOW()
  to construct the show methods based on device name.
  Reported by Kernel test bot.

 drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c | 21 ++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c b/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c
index f0d8f60acee1..99b06a3e8fb1 100644
--- a/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c
+++ b/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c
@@ -571,8 +571,8 @@ EDAC_DCT_ATTR_SHOW(dbam0);
 EDAC_DCT_ATTR_SHOW(top_mem);
 EDAC_DCT_ATTR_SHOW(top_mem2);
 
-static ssize_t hole_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *mattr,
-			 char *data)
+static ssize_t dram_hole_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *mattr,
+			      char *data)
 {
 	struct mem_ctl_info *mci = to_mci(dev);
 
@@ -593,7 +593,7 @@ static DEVICE_ATTR(dhar, S_IRUGO, dhar_show, NULL);
 static DEVICE_ATTR(dbam, S_IRUGO, dbam0_show, NULL);
 static DEVICE_ATTR(topmem, S_IRUGO, top_mem_show, NULL);
 static DEVICE_ATTR(topmem2, S_IRUGO, top_mem2_show, NULL);
-static DEVICE_ATTR(dram_hole, S_IRUGO, hole_show, NULL);
+static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(dram_hole);
 
 static struct attribute *dbg_attrs[] = {
 	&dev_attr_dhar.attr,
@@ -802,16 +802,11 @@ static ssize_t inject_write_store(struct device *dev,
  * update NUM_INJ_ATTRS in case you add new members
  */
 
-static DEVICE_ATTR(inject_section, S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR,
-		   inject_section_show, inject_section_store);
-static DEVICE_ATTR(inject_word, S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR,
-		   inject_word_show, inject_word_store);
-static DEVICE_ATTR(inject_ecc_vector, S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR,
-		   inject_ecc_vector_show, inject_ecc_vector_store);
-static DEVICE_ATTR(inject_write, S_IWUSR,
-		   NULL, inject_write_store);
-static DEVICE_ATTR(inject_read,  S_IWUSR,
-		   NULL, inject_read_store);
+static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(inject_section);
+static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(inject_word);
+static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(inject_ecc_vector);
+static DEVICE_ATTR_WO(inject_write);
+static DEVICE_ATTR_WO(inject_read);
 
 static struct attribute *inj_attrs[] = {
 	&dev_attr_inject_section.attr,
-- 
2.28.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2] drivers:edac: Use DEVICE_ATTR helper macros
@ 2021-07-11 14:10 ` Dwaipayan Ray
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Dwaipayan Ray @ 2021-07-11 14:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: kbuild-all

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2583 bytes --]

Instead of "open coding" DEVICE_ATTR, use the corresponding
helper macros DEVICE_ATTR_{RW,RO_WO} in amd64_edac.c

Some function names needed to be changed to match the device
conventions <foo>_show and <foo>_store, but the functionality
itself is unchanged.

The devices using EDAC_DCT_ATTR_SHOW() are left unchanged.

Signed-off-by: Dwaipayan Ray <dwaipayanray1@gmail.com>
---

Changes in v2:
- Revert back the device name changes which broke
  the kernel. These were using the macro EDAC_DCT_ATTR_SHOW()
  to construct the show methods based on device name.
  Reported by Kernel test bot.

 drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c | 21 ++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c b/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c
index f0d8f60acee1..99b06a3e8fb1 100644
--- a/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c
+++ b/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c
@@ -571,8 +571,8 @@ EDAC_DCT_ATTR_SHOW(dbam0);
 EDAC_DCT_ATTR_SHOW(top_mem);
 EDAC_DCT_ATTR_SHOW(top_mem2);
 
-static ssize_t hole_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *mattr,
-			 char *data)
+static ssize_t dram_hole_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *mattr,
+			      char *data)
 {
 	struct mem_ctl_info *mci = to_mci(dev);
 
@@ -593,7 +593,7 @@ static DEVICE_ATTR(dhar, S_IRUGO, dhar_show, NULL);
 static DEVICE_ATTR(dbam, S_IRUGO, dbam0_show, NULL);
 static DEVICE_ATTR(topmem, S_IRUGO, top_mem_show, NULL);
 static DEVICE_ATTR(topmem2, S_IRUGO, top_mem2_show, NULL);
-static DEVICE_ATTR(dram_hole, S_IRUGO, hole_show, NULL);
+static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(dram_hole);
 
 static struct attribute *dbg_attrs[] = {
 	&dev_attr_dhar.attr,
@@ -802,16 +802,11 @@ static ssize_t inject_write_store(struct device *dev,
  * update NUM_INJ_ATTRS in case you add new members
  */
 
-static DEVICE_ATTR(inject_section, S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR,
-		   inject_section_show, inject_section_store);
-static DEVICE_ATTR(inject_word, S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR,
-		   inject_word_show, inject_word_store);
-static DEVICE_ATTR(inject_ecc_vector, S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR,
-		   inject_ecc_vector_show, inject_ecc_vector_store);
-static DEVICE_ATTR(inject_write, S_IWUSR,
-		   NULL, inject_write_store);
-static DEVICE_ATTR(inject_read,  S_IWUSR,
-		   NULL, inject_read_store);
+static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(inject_section);
+static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(inject_word);
+static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(inject_ecc_vector);
+static DEVICE_ATTR_WO(inject_write);
+static DEVICE_ATTR_WO(inject_read);
 
 static struct attribute *inj_attrs[] = {
 	&dev_attr_inject_section.attr,
-- 
2.28.0

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] drivers:edac: Use DEVICE_ATTR helper macros
  2021-07-11 14:10 ` Dwaipayan Ray
@ 2021-07-12 19:44   ` Yazen Ghannam
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Yazen Ghannam @ 2021-07-12 19:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Dwaipayan Ray
  Cc: bp, mchehab, tony.luck, james.morse, rric, lukas.bulwahn,
	kbuild-all, linux-edac, linux-kernel, lkp

On Sun, Jul 11, 2021 at 07:40:02PM +0530, Dwaipayan Ray wrote:
> Instead of "open coding" DEVICE_ATTR, use the corresponding
> helper macros DEVICE_ATTR_{RW,RO_WO} in amd64_edac.c
> 

I think you meant to write "RO,WO" rather than "RO_WO", correct?

Was this change inspired by a code-checking tool or script?

> Some function names needed to be changed to match the device
> conventions <foo>_show and <foo>_store, but the functionality
> itself is unchanged.
> 
> The devices using EDAC_DCT_ATTR_SHOW() are left unchanged.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dwaipayan Ray <dwaipayanray1@gmail.com>
> ---
> 
> Changes in v2:
> - Revert back the device name changes which broke
>   the kernel. These were using the macro EDAC_DCT_ATTR_SHOW()
>   to construct the show methods based on device name.
>   Reported by Kernel test bot.
> 
>  drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c | 21 ++++++++-------------
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 

The $SUBJECT should say something like "EDAC/amd64" since the change is
wholly within amd64_edac.c. Using "driver:edac" makes it seem like this
patch affects multiple EDAC modules.

But otherwise it looks good to me.

Reviewed-by: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@amd.com>

Thanks,
Yazen

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] drivers:edac: Use DEVICE_ATTR helper macros
@ 2021-07-12 19:44   ` Yazen Ghannam
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Yazen Ghannam @ 2021-07-12 19:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: kbuild-all

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1251 bytes --]

On Sun, Jul 11, 2021 at 07:40:02PM +0530, Dwaipayan Ray wrote:
> Instead of "open coding" DEVICE_ATTR, use the corresponding
> helper macros DEVICE_ATTR_{RW,RO_WO} in amd64_edac.c
> 

I think you meant to write "RO,WO" rather than "RO_WO", correct?

Was this change inspired by a code-checking tool or script?

> Some function names needed to be changed to match the device
> conventions <foo>_show and <foo>_store, but the functionality
> itself is unchanged.
> 
> The devices using EDAC_DCT_ATTR_SHOW() are left unchanged.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dwaipayan Ray <dwaipayanray1@gmail.com>
> ---
> 
> Changes in v2:
> - Revert back the device name changes which broke
>   the kernel. These were using the macro EDAC_DCT_ATTR_SHOW()
>   to construct the show methods based on device name.
>   Reported by Kernel test bot.
> 
>  drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c | 21 ++++++++-------------
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 

The $SUBJECT should say something like "EDAC/amd64" since the change is
wholly within amd64_edac.c. Using "driver:edac" makes it seem like this
patch affects multiple EDAC modules.

But otherwise it looks good to me.

Reviewed-by: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@amd.com>

Thanks,
Yazen

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] drivers:edac: Use DEVICE_ATTR helper macros
  2021-07-12 19:44   ` Yazen Ghannam
@ 2021-07-13  6:33     ` Dwaipayan Ray
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Dwaipayan Ray @ 2021-07-13  6:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Yazen Ghannam
  Cc: bp, Mauro Carvalho Chehab, tony.luck, james.morse, rric,
	Lukas Bulwahn, kbuild-all, linux-edac, linux-kernel, lkp

On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 1:14 AM Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@amd.com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jul 11, 2021 at 07:40:02PM +0530, Dwaipayan Ray wrote:
> > Instead of "open coding" DEVICE_ATTR, use the corresponding
> > helper macros DEVICE_ATTR_{RW,RO_WO} in amd64_edac.c
> >
>
> I think you meant to write "RO,WO" rather than "RO_WO", correct?
>

Yes that's correct. It's a typo. I will fix it.

> Was this change inspired by a code-checking tool or script?
>

Yes, the particular warnings were detected via a checkpatch run on
the whole kernel and screening for really unwanted violations.
However, the changes were made manually.


> > Some function names needed to be changed to match the device
> > conventions <foo>_show and <foo>_store, but the functionality
> > itself is unchanged.
> >
> > The devices using EDAC_DCT_ATTR_SHOW() are left unchanged.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dwaipayan Ray <dwaipayanray1@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >
> > Changes in v2:
> > - Revert back the device name changes which broke
> >   the kernel. These were using the macro EDAC_DCT_ATTR_SHOW()
> >   to construct the show methods based on device name.
> >   Reported by Kernel test bot.
> >
> >  drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c | 21 ++++++++-------------
> >  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> >
>
> The $SUBJECT should say something like "EDAC/amd64" since the change is
> wholly within amd64_edac.c. Using "driver:edac" makes it seem like this
> patch affects multiple EDAC modules.
>

That makes sense. I will send in a new patch with these updates.

> But otherwise it looks good to me.
>
> Reviewed-by: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@amd.com>
>
> Thanks,
> Yazen

Thanks for the review,
Dwaipayan.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] drivers:edac: Use DEVICE_ATTR helper macros
@ 2021-07-13  6:33     ` Dwaipayan Ray
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Dwaipayan Ray @ 2021-07-13  6:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: kbuild-all

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1736 bytes --]

On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 1:14 AM Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@amd.com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jul 11, 2021 at 07:40:02PM +0530, Dwaipayan Ray wrote:
> > Instead of "open coding" DEVICE_ATTR, use the corresponding
> > helper macros DEVICE_ATTR_{RW,RO_WO} in amd64_edac.c
> >
>
> I think you meant to write "RO,WO" rather than "RO_WO", correct?
>

Yes that's correct. It's a typo. I will fix it.

> Was this change inspired by a code-checking tool or script?
>

Yes, the particular warnings were detected via a checkpatch run on
the whole kernel and screening for really unwanted violations.
However, the changes were made manually.


> > Some function names needed to be changed to match the device
> > conventions <foo>_show and <foo>_store, but the functionality
> > itself is unchanged.
> >
> > The devices using EDAC_DCT_ATTR_SHOW() are left unchanged.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dwaipayan Ray <dwaipayanray1@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >
> > Changes in v2:
> > - Revert back the device name changes which broke
> >   the kernel. These were using the macro EDAC_DCT_ATTR_SHOW()
> >   to construct the show methods based on device name.
> >   Reported by Kernel test bot.
> >
> >  drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c | 21 ++++++++-------------
> >  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> >
>
> The $SUBJECT should say something like "EDAC/amd64" since the change is
> wholly within amd64_edac.c. Using "driver:edac" makes it seem like this
> patch affects multiple EDAC modules.
>

That makes sense. I will send in a new patch with these updates.

> But otherwise it looks good to me.
>
> Reviewed-by: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@amd.com>
>
> Thanks,
> Yazen

Thanks for the review,
Dwaipayan.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-07-13  6:33 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-07-11 14:10 [PATCH v2] drivers:edac: Use DEVICE_ATTR helper macros Dwaipayan Ray
2021-07-11 14:10 ` Dwaipayan Ray
2021-07-12 19:44 ` Yazen Ghannam
2021-07-12 19:44   ` Yazen Ghannam
2021-07-13  6:33   ` Dwaipayan Ray
2021-07-13  6:33     ` Dwaipayan Ray

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.