From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08C0CC07E96 for ; Wed, 14 Jul 2021 02:19:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3F5560232 for ; Wed, 14 Jul 2021 02:19:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S237556AbhGNCWT (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Jul 2021 22:22:19 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:36288 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S237555AbhGNCWS (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Jul 2021 22:22:18 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-x42b.google.com (mail-pf1-x42b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42b]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 876A2C0613DD for ; Tue, 13 Jul 2021 19:19:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pf1-x42b.google.com with SMTP id y4so590383pfi.9 for ; Tue, 13 Jul 2021 19:19:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=YUWPTzB4dLR17/T5lZ7IYCIE7LvDfGsZbPME2WfdaEQ=; b=Skmc4/PTwW2vYOAvkxNEp/sYehALwIe3vbYmis9pp8B8s8+wKbwKLLkS2x6Uw0hnu3 0svGx8KcIUZK3SigWkrI1LBoqGu1Gr/zfFuUkQYY1z+GkIQJyZmhGqeDKIrbtkGJkA9/ pV4SFmb6Em4EJHyfkvu52ERl3YZgKA2kl4gFPSlJlROoiehQQIfHPqiC99fxTZvdJuLd EiLrpiwCuiSYVnmy8yfgjiy36rHG6vuajRXQqWXRpeItlXDPp/KYqloeAmd8U0ejyp7Z +rOKfLdJcEVKX2jUAiZJFb1dHgMx8bLQzO3xc3+iNg0jTqpv8EwU3a8X/RGDZ9tV/fe8 53JQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=YUWPTzB4dLR17/T5lZ7IYCIE7LvDfGsZbPME2WfdaEQ=; b=fYmu+S1NS5WA8xFDqsEJMu1+ltc3eNU6a3sdeC2gwC8LwQQ7uk7rrCdsGxnlkXxVYQ fJzPs0Y8ziPjSMLk/IEvfEx7erYyf6rZDgBHyCAUC+bBPy40glgxwAbyXKIO8GnNz2J1 8Dmj5AaQtTzz8B4f+vNmKstG/c8TuGmo/Bc1kICMqHOrug7Dh5DP4p3F0epyyL2qPWJu PIfViB6fpHB7rT0liI6k0lOSOCn4ghDG6e0BMcVKaPChbOs960qcTf25XRZ7HgAv9r5H SwiVBZkkpTSCXR5wG2nTyBa4lQII5NBXK3TtAIaLsruGiuHTToeUTEDA/DAYcVKGRD3G 1QuA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530vzY/E+o1e2+x4Ge+jWER7rrdAY1dMwb27AuXiH3pkQQba4Ck7 OSkwFaIcuth0qdjPrj+X4v3+pw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxLOPLEDHG4baKqARncau1utGS0ltDshGrrtQ4HLM6pZ8LZIXvVGdAGINqm7KHcuA2FTBkJpw== X-Received: by 2002:a63:6e09:: with SMTP id j9mr6980452pgc.275.1626229167125; Tue, 13 Jul 2021 19:19:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([106.201.108.2]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a6sm437140pjq.27.2021.07.13.19.19.25 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 13 Jul 2021 19:19:26 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2021 07:49:24 +0530 From: Viresh Kumar To: Rob Herring Cc: Jason Wang , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Arnd Bergmann , Jean-Philippe Brucker , Vincent Guittot , Bill Mills , Alex =?utf-8?Q?Benn=C3=A9e?= , "Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult" , Jie Deng , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "open list:DRM DRIVER FOR QEMU'S CIRRUS DEVICE" Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] dt-bindings: virtio: mmio: Add support for device subnode Message-ID: <20210714021924.uob5wrasipzhbyrj@vireshk-i7> References: <20210713151917.zouwfckidnjxvohn@vireshk-i7> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716-391-311a52 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 13-07-21, 13:34, Rob Herring wrote: > On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 9:19 AM Viresh Kumar wrote: > > We already do this for linux-event-codes.h and so I thought it is the > > right way of doing it :) > > Humm, maybe it's okay. Please double check then... > > > Else we can create a new copy, which will be a mess, or use hardcoded > > values. > > Though you may not need the header based on what Arnd and I have suggested. Yeah, we may not need it at all. New node or not, reg property will get converted to a compatible anyway.. Thanks. -- viresh From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EB64C07E95 for ; Wed, 14 Jul 2021 02:20:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [140.211.166.138]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F1E7661279 for ; Wed, 14 Jul 2021 02:20:36 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org F1E7661279 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linaro.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE844823DD; Wed, 14 Jul 2021 02:20:36 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp1.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mirAML1M8s_D; Wed, 14 Jul 2021 02:20:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.linuxfoundation.org (lf-lists.osuosl.org [140.211.9.56]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67F0D818A7; Wed, 14 Jul 2021 02:20:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lf-lists.osuosl.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BEB3C001C; Wed, 14 Jul 2021 02:20:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org (smtp2.osuosl.org [140.211.166.133]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FBBBC000E for ; Wed, 14 Jul 2021 02:20:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41A574054D for ; Wed, 14 Jul 2021 02:19:28 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Authentication-Results: smtp2.osuosl.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp2.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 59zcg-SVNGX5 for ; Wed, 14 Jul 2021 02:19:27 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0 Received: from mail-pf1-x430.google.com (mail-pf1-x430.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::430]) by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9FA4B40251 for ; Wed, 14 Jul 2021 02:19:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pf1-x430.google.com with SMTP id j9so601603pfc.5 for ; Tue, 13 Jul 2021 19:19:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=YUWPTzB4dLR17/T5lZ7IYCIE7LvDfGsZbPME2WfdaEQ=; b=Skmc4/PTwW2vYOAvkxNEp/sYehALwIe3vbYmis9pp8B8s8+wKbwKLLkS2x6Uw0hnu3 0svGx8KcIUZK3SigWkrI1LBoqGu1Gr/zfFuUkQYY1z+GkIQJyZmhGqeDKIrbtkGJkA9/ pV4SFmb6Em4EJHyfkvu52ERl3YZgKA2kl4gFPSlJlROoiehQQIfHPqiC99fxTZvdJuLd EiLrpiwCuiSYVnmy8yfgjiy36rHG6vuajRXQqWXRpeItlXDPp/KYqloeAmd8U0ejyp7Z +rOKfLdJcEVKX2jUAiZJFb1dHgMx8bLQzO3xc3+iNg0jTqpv8EwU3a8X/RGDZ9tV/fe8 53JQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=YUWPTzB4dLR17/T5lZ7IYCIE7LvDfGsZbPME2WfdaEQ=; b=fBi88WwyNY8xgnlY6I6oZdoUEe3+Kr0yvknU5mPIjsaHCsiY9X8shAHzj77OGY/Hzb p6BXo4v93WEF7VdKucbxLKin7NObX6XQ/6lMImx/5daj4rasCwk/3mGtAa+dEc4K1L+4 tC50Ue27t3vQfn/9kjWQXrdLgi81ylm3mxQPyj6f34OBmTexInuJGbWgAo5rG8dmUXt9 98+a2grKys9QLBTw5+jsEPdOgP980lxYCMYQRK3lC1dlhX1QXqQlljJjDhUtZt90zO0/ KrBi38MakZIi+NdYa2b2Yk2ITbSbWLmZzs57B7r5s7Id6aYSIPzELI2gPtyLu7QM6fyD qyJg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532BV2g1YawfBOtVzxRVHPPkwaaEWbL6FRJ+RnAqnRoq5Ft9jr21 JXCvZ9d/TvWxcXOKlq2ir7xKqw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxLOPLEDHG4baKqARncau1utGS0ltDshGrrtQ4HLM6pZ8LZIXvVGdAGINqm7KHcuA2FTBkJpw== X-Received: by 2002:a63:6e09:: with SMTP id j9mr6980452pgc.275.1626229167125; Tue, 13 Jul 2021 19:19:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([106.201.108.2]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a6sm437140pjq.27.2021.07.13.19.19.25 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 13 Jul 2021 19:19:26 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2021 07:49:24 +0530 From: Viresh Kumar To: Rob Herring Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] dt-bindings: virtio: mmio: Add support for device subnode Message-ID: <20210714021924.uob5wrasipzhbyrj@vireshk-i7> References: <20210713151917.zouwfckidnjxvohn@vireshk-i7> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716-391-311a52 Cc: Arnd Bergmann , Vincent Guittot , Jean-Philippe Brucker , "Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult" , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "open list:DRM DRIVER FOR QEMU'S CIRRUS DEVICE" , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Bill Mills X-BeenThere: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux virtualization List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Sender: "Virtualization" On 13-07-21, 13:34, Rob Herring wrote: > On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 9:19 AM Viresh Kumar wrote: > > We already do this for linux-event-codes.h and so I thought it is the > > right way of doing it :) > > Humm, maybe it's okay. Please double check then... > > > Else we can create a new copy, which will be a mess, or use hardcoded > > values. > > Though you may not need the header based on what Arnd and I have suggested. Yeah, we may not need it at all. New node or not, reg property will get converted to a compatible anyway.. Thanks. -- viresh _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization