All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wei Wang <wei.w.wang@intel.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: mst@redhat.com, david@redhat.com, dgilbert@redhat.com,
	peterx@redhat.com, quintela@redhat.com
Subject: [PATCH v2] migration: clear the memory region dirty bitmap when skipping free pages
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2021 03:53:26 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210715075326.421977-1-wei.w.wang@intel.com> (raw)

When skipping free pages to send, their corresponding dirty bits in the
memory region dirty bitmap need to be cleared. Otherwise the skipped
pages will be sent in the next round after the migration thread syncs
dirty bits from the memory region dirty bitmap.

Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Reported-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Wei Wang <wei.w.wang@intel.com>
---
 migration/ram.c | 72 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 54 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

v1->v2 changelog:
- move migration_clear_memory_region_dirty_bitmap under bitmap_mutex as
  we lack confidence to have it outside the lock for now.
- clean the unnecessary subproject commit.

diff --git a/migration/ram.c b/migration/ram.c
index b5fc454b2f..69e06b55ec 100644
--- a/migration/ram.c
+++ b/migration/ram.c
@@ -789,6 +789,51 @@ unsigned long migration_bitmap_find_dirty(RAMState *rs, RAMBlock *rb,
     return find_next_bit(bitmap, size, start);
 }
 
+static void migration_clear_memory_region_dirty_bitmap(RAMState *rs,
+                                                       RAMBlock *rb,
+                                                       unsigned long page)
+{
+    uint8_t shift;
+    hwaddr size, start;
+
+    if (!rb->clear_bmap || !clear_bmap_test_and_clear(rb, page)) {
+        return;
+    }
+
+    shift = rb->clear_bmap_shift;
+    /*
+     * CLEAR_BITMAP_SHIFT_MIN should always guarantee this... this
+     * can make things easier sometimes since then start address
+     * of the small chunk will always be 64 pages aligned so the
+     * bitmap will always be aligned to unsigned long. We should
+     * even be able to remove this restriction but I'm simply
+     * keeping it.
+     */
+    assert(shift >= 6);
+
+    size = 1ULL << (TARGET_PAGE_BITS + shift);
+    start = (((ram_addr_t)page) << TARGET_PAGE_BITS) & (-size);
+    trace_migration_bitmap_clear_dirty(rb->idstr, start, size, page);
+    memory_region_clear_dirty_bitmap(rb->mr, start, size);
+}
+
+static void
+migration_clear_memory_region_dirty_bitmap_range(RAMState *rs,
+                                                 RAMBlock *rb,
+                                                 unsigned long start,
+                                                 unsigned long npages)
+{
+    unsigned long page_to_clear, i, nchunks;
+    unsigned long chunk_pages = 1UL << rb->clear_bmap_shift;
+
+    nchunks = (start + npages) / chunk_pages - start / chunk_pages + 1;
+
+    for (i = 0; i < nchunks; i++) {
+        page_to_clear = start + i * chunk_pages;
+        migration_clear_memory_region_dirty_bitmap(rs, rb, page_to_clear);
+    }
+}
+
 static inline bool migration_bitmap_clear_dirty(RAMState *rs,
                                                 RAMBlock *rb,
                                                 unsigned long page)
@@ -803,26 +848,9 @@ static inline bool migration_bitmap_clear_dirty(RAMState *rs,
      * the page in the chunk we clear the remote dirty bitmap for all.
      * Clearing it earlier won't be a problem, but too late will.
      */
-    if (rb->clear_bmap && clear_bmap_test_and_clear(rb, page)) {
-        uint8_t shift = rb->clear_bmap_shift;
-        hwaddr size = 1ULL << (TARGET_PAGE_BITS + shift);
-        hwaddr start = (((ram_addr_t)page) << TARGET_PAGE_BITS) & (-size);
-
-        /*
-         * CLEAR_BITMAP_SHIFT_MIN should always guarantee this... this
-         * can make things easier sometimes since then start address
-         * of the small chunk will always be 64 pages aligned so the
-         * bitmap will always be aligned to unsigned long.  We should
-         * even be able to remove this restriction but I'm simply
-         * keeping it.
-         */
-        assert(shift >= 6);
-        trace_migration_bitmap_clear_dirty(rb->idstr, start, size, page);
-        memory_region_clear_dirty_bitmap(rb->mr, start, size);
-    }
+    migration_clear_memory_region_dirty_bitmap(rs, rb, page);
 
     ret = test_and_clear_bit(page, rb->bmap);
-
     if (ret) {
         rs->migration_dirty_pages--;
     }
@@ -2741,6 +2769,14 @@ void qemu_guest_free_page_hint(void *addr, size_t len)
         npages = used_len >> TARGET_PAGE_BITS;
 
         qemu_mutex_lock(&ram_state->bitmap_mutex);
+        /*
+         * The skipped free pages are equavelent to be sent from clear_bmap's
+         * perspective, so clear the bits from the memory region bitmap which
+         * are initially set. Otherwise those skipped pages will be sent in
+         * the next round after syncing from the memory region bitmap.
+         */
+        migration_clear_memory_region_dirty_bitmap_range(ram_state, block,
+                                                         start, npages);
         ram_state->migration_dirty_pages -=
                       bitmap_count_one_with_offset(block->bmap, start, npages);
         bitmap_clear(block->bmap, start, npages);
-- 
2.25.1



             reply	other threads:[~2021-07-15  9:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-15  7:53 Wei Wang [this message]
2021-07-15  9:28 ` [PATCH v2] migration: clear the memory region dirty bitmap when skipping free pages David Hildenbrand
2021-07-16  6:15   ` Wang, Wei W
2021-07-16  8:26     ` David Hildenbrand
2021-07-19  5:18       ` Wang, Wei W

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210715075326.421977-1-wei.w.wang@intel.com \
    --to=wei.w.wang@intel.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=quintela@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.