Hello,

On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 11:51:44AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> To ease review this reuses the formerly implemented callbacks.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
> ---
>  drivers/pwm/pwm-tegra.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-tegra.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-tegra.c
> index 11a10b575ace..1161c6323e60 100644
> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-tegra.c
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-tegra.c
> @@ -227,10 +227,36 @@ static void tegra_pwm_disable(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm)
>  	clk_disable_unprepare(pc->clk);
>  }
>  
> +static int tegra_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
> +			   const struct pwm_state *state)
> +{
> +	int err;
> +
> +	if (state->polarity != PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	if (!state->enabled) {
> +		if (pwm->state.enabled)
> +			tegra_pwm_disable(chip, pwm);
> +		return 0;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (state->period != pwm->state.period ||
> +	    state->duty_cycle != pwm->state.duty_cycle) {
> +		err = tegra_pwm_config(pwm->chip, pwm, (int)state->duty_cycle,
> +				       (int)state->period);

This patch has the same problem as my other apply conversions. I'll have
to rework that before it is safe to take this.

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |