All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Intel-gfx] [CI 1/2] drm/i915/step: Add macro magic for handling steps
@ 2021-07-19 21:38 Anusha Srivatsa
  2021-07-19 21:38 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 2/2] drm/i915/dmc: Change intel_get_stepping_info() Anusha Srivatsa
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Anusha Srivatsa @ 2021-07-19 21:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: intel-gfx

With the addition of stepping info for
all platforms, lets use macros for handling them
and autogenerating code for all steps at a time.

Suggested-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.c | 14 ++++++++++++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.h | 37 +++++++++++++++++++------------
 2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.c
index 9fcf17708cc8..d150d138e889 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.c
@@ -182,3 +182,17 @@ void intel_step_init(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
 
 	RUNTIME_INFO(i915)->step = step;
 }
+
+#define STEP_NAME_CASE(name)	\
+	(case STEP_##name:	\
+		return #name)
+
+const char *intel_step_name(enum intel_step step)
+{
+	switch (step) {
+	STEP_NAME_LIST(STEP_NAME_CASE);
+
+	default:
+		return "**";
+	}
+}
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.h
index 88a77159703e..f6641e2a3c77 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.h
@@ -15,30 +15,39 @@ struct intel_step_info {
 	u8 display_step;
 };
 
+#define STEP_ENUM_VAL(name)  STEP_##name,
+
+#define STEP_NAME_LIST(func)		\
+	func(A0)			\
+	func(A1)			\
+	func(A2)			\
+	func(B0)			\
+	func(B1)			\
+	func(B2)			\
+	func(C0)			\
+	func(C1)			\
+	func(D0)			\
+	func(D1)			\
+	func(E0)			\
+	func(F0)			\
+	func(G0)			\
+	func(H0)			\
+	func(I0)			\
+	func(I1)			\
+	func(J0)
+
 /*
  * Symbolic steppings that do not match the hardware. These are valid both as gt
  * and display steppings as symbolic names.
  */
 enum intel_step {
 	STEP_NONE = 0,
-	STEP_A0,
-	STEP_A2,
-	STEP_B0,
-	STEP_B1,
-	STEP_C0,
-	STEP_D0,
-	STEP_D1,
-	STEP_E0,
-	STEP_F0,
-	STEP_G0,
-	STEP_H0,
-	STEP_I0,
-	STEP_I1,
-	STEP_J0,
+	STEP_NAME_LIST(STEP_ENUM_VAL)
 	STEP_FUTURE,
 	STEP_FOREVER,
 };
 
 void intel_step_init(struct drm_i915_private *i915);
+const char *intel_step_name(enum intel_step step);
 
 #endif /* __INTEL_STEP_H__ */
-- 
2.32.0

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [Intel-gfx] [CI 2/2] drm/i915/dmc: Change intel_get_stepping_info()
  2021-07-19 21:38 [Intel-gfx] [CI 1/2] drm/i915/step: Add macro magic for handling steps Anusha Srivatsa
@ 2021-07-19 21:38 ` Anusha Srivatsa
  2021-07-19 22:02 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for series starting with [CI,1/2] drm/i915/step: Add macro magic for handling steps Patchwork
  2021-08-12  9:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 1/2] " Jani Nikula
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Anusha Srivatsa @ 2021-07-19 21:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: intel-gfx

Lets use RUNTIME_INFO->step since all platforms now have their
stepping info in intel_step.c. This makes intel_get_stepping_info()
a lot simpler.

Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c | 50 ++++--------------------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c
index f8789d4543bf..1f6c32932331 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c
@@ -247,50 +247,15 @@ bool intel_dmc_has_payload(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
 	return i915->dmc.dmc_info[DMC_FW_MAIN].payload;
 }
 
-static const struct stepping_info skl_stepping_info[] = {
-	{'A', '0'}, {'B', '0'}, {'C', '0'},
-	{'D', '0'}, {'E', '0'}, {'F', '0'},
-	{'G', '0'}, {'H', '0'}, {'I', '0'},
-	{'J', '0'}, {'K', '0'}
-};
-
-static const struct stepping_info bxt_stepping_info[] = {
-	{'A', '0'}, {'A', '1'}, {'A', '2'},
-	{'B', '0'}, {'B', '1'}, {'B', '2'}
-};
-
-static const struct stepping_info icl_stepping_info[] = {
-	{'A', '0'}, {'A', '1'}, {'A', '2'},
-	{'B', '0'}, {'B', '2'},
-	{'C', '0'}
-};
-
-static const struct stepping_info no_stepping_info = { '*', '*' };
-
 static const struct stepping_info *
-intel_get_stepping_info(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
+intel_get_stepping_info(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
+			struct stepping_info *si)
 {
-	const struct stepping_info *si;
-	unsigned int size;
-
-	if (IS_ICELAKE(dev_priv)) {
-		size = ARRAY_SIZE(icl_stepping_info);
-		si = icl_stepping_info;
-	} else if (IS_SKYLAKE(dev_priv)) {
-		size = ARRAY_SIZE(skl_stepping_info);
-		si = skl_stepping_info;
-	} else if (IS_BROXTON(dev_priv)) {
-		size = ARRAY_SIZE(bxt_stepping_info);
-		si = bxt_stepping_info;
-	} else {
-		size = 0;
-		si = NULL;
-	}
-
-	if (INTEL_REVID(dev_priv) < size)
-		return si + INTEL_REVID(dev_priv);
+	const char *step_name = intel_step_name(RUNTIME_INFO(i915)->step.display_step);
 
-	return &no_stepping_info;
+	si->stepping = step_name[0];
+	si->substepping = step_name[1];
+	return si;
 }
 
 static void gen9_set_dc_state_debugmask(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
@@ -616,7 +581,8 @@ static void parse_dmc_fw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
 	struct intel_package_header *package_header;
 	struct intel_dmc_header_base *dmc_header;
 	struct intel_dmc *dmc = &dev_priv->dmc;
-	const struct stepping_info *si = intel_get_stepping_info(dev_priv);
+	struct stepping_info display_info = { '*', '*'};
+	const struct stepping_info *si = intel_get_stepping_info(dev_priv, &display_info);
 	u32 readcount = 0;
 	u32 r, offset;
 	int id;
-- 
2.32.0

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for series starting with [CI,1/2] drm/i915/step: Add macro magic for handling steps
  2021-07-19 21:38 [Intel-gfx] [CI 1/2] drm/i915/step: Add macro magic for handling steps Anusha Srivatsa
  2021-07-19 21:38 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 2/2] drm/i915/dmc: Change intel_get_stepping_info() Anusha Srivatsa
@ 2021-07-19 22:02 ` Patchwork
  2021-08-12  9:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 1/2] " Jani Nikula
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2021-07-19 22:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Anusha Srivatsa; +Cc: intel-gfx

== Series Details ==

Series: series starting with [CI,1/2] drm/i915/step: Add macro magic for handling steps
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/92734/
State : failure

== Summary ==

CALL    scripts/checksyscalls.sh
  CALL    scripts/atomic/check-atomics.sh
  DESCEND objtool
  CHK     include/generated/compile.h
  CC [M]  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.o
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.c: In function ‘intel_step_name’:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.c:187:3: error: expected expression before ‘case’
  (case STEP_##name: \
   ^~~~
./drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.h:21:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘STEP_NAME_CASE’
  func(A0)   \
  ^~~~
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.c:193:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘STEP_NAME_LIST’
  STEP_NAME_LIST(STEP_NAME_CASE);
  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.c:187:3: error: expected expression before ‘case’
  (case STEP_##name: \
   ^~~~
./drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.h:22:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘STEP_NAME_CASE’
  func(A1)   \
  ^~~~
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.c:193:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘STEP_NAME_LIST’
  STEP_NAME_LIST(STEP_NAME_CASE);
  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.c:187:3: error: expected expression before ‘case’
  (case STEP_##name: \
   ^~~~
./drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.h:23:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘STEP_NAME_CASE’
  func(A2)   \
  ^~~~
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.c:193:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘STEP_NAME_LIST’
  STEP_NAME_LIST(STEP_NAME_CASE);
  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.c:187:3: error: expected expression before ‘case’
  (case STEP_##name: \
   ^~~~
./drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.h:24:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘STEP_NAME_CASE’
  func(B0)   \
  ^~~~
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.c:193:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘STEP_NAME_LIST’
  STEP_NAME_LIST(STEP_NAME_CASE);
  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.c:187:3: error: expected expression before ‘case’
  (case STEP_##name: \
   ^~~~
./drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.h:25:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘STEP_NAME_CASE’
  func(B1)   \
  ^~~~
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.c:193:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘STEP_NAME_LIST’
  STEP_NAME_LIST(STEP_NAME_CASE);
  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.c:187:3: error: expected expression before ‘case’
  (case STEP_##name: \
   ^~~~
./drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.h:26:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘STEP_NAME_CASE’
  func(B2)   \
  ^~~~
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.c:193:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘STEP_NAME_LIST’
  STEP_NAME_LIST(STEP_NAME_CASE);
  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.c:187:3: error: expected expression before ‘case’
  (case STEP_##name: \
   ^~~~
./drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.h:27:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘STEP_NAME_CASE’
  func(C0)   \
  ^~~~
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.c:193:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘STEP_NAME_LIST’
  STEP_NAME_LIST(STEP_NAME_CASE);
  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.c:187:3: error: expected expression before ‘case’
  (case STEP_##name: \
   ^~~~
./drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.h:28:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘STEP_NAME_CASE’
  func(C1)   \
  ^~~~
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.c:193:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘STEP_NAME_LIST’
  STEP_NAME_LIST(STEP_NAME_CASE);
  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.c:187:3: error: expected expression before ‘case’
  (case STEP_##name: \
   ^~~~
./drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.h:29:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘STEP_NAME_CASE’
  func(D0)   \
  ^~~~
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.c:193:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘STEP_NAME_LIST’
  STEP_NAME_LIST(STEP_NAME_CASE);
  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.c:187:3: error: expected expression before ‘case’
  (case STEP_##name: \
   ^~~~
./drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.h:30:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘STEP_NAME_CASE’
  func(D1)   \
  ^~~~
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.c:193:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘STEP_NAME_LIST’
  STEP_NAME_LIST(STEP_NAME_CASE);
  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.c:187:3: error: expected expression before ‘case’
  (case STEP_##name: \
   ^~~~
./drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.h:31:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘STEP_NAME_CASE’
  func(E0)   \
  ^~~~
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.c:193:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘STEP_NAME_LIST’
  STEP_NAME_LIST(STEP_NAME_CASE);
  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.c:187:3: error: expected expression before ‘case’
  (case STEP_##name: \
   ^~~~
./drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.h:32:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘STEP_NAME_CASE’
  func(F0)   \
  ^~~~
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.c:193:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘STEP_NAME_LIST’
  STEP_NAME_LIST(STEP_NAME_CASE);
  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.c:187:3: error: expected expression before ‘case’
  (case STEP_##name: \
   ^~~~
./drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.h:33:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘STEP_NAME_CASE’
  func(G0)   \
  ^~~~
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.c:193:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘STEP_NAME_LIST’
  STEP_NAME_LIST(STEP_NAME_CASE);
  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.c:187:3: error: expected expression before ‘case’
  (case STEP_##name: \
   ^~~~
./drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.h:34:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘STEP_NAME_CASE’
  func(H0)   \
  ^~~~
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.c:193:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘STEP_NAME_LIST’
  STEP_NAME_LIST(STEP_NAME_CASE);
  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.c:187:3: error: expected expression before ‘case’
  (case STEP_##name: \
   ^~~~
./drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.h:35:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘STEP_NAME_CASE’
  func(I0)   \
  ^~~~
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.c:193:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘STEP_NAME_LIST’
  STEP_NAME_LIST(STEP_NAME_CASE);
  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.c:187:3: error: expected expression before ‘case’
  (case STEP_##name: \
   ^~~~
./drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.h:36:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘STEP_NAME_CASE’
  func(I1)   \
  ^~~~
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.c:193:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘STEP_NAME_LIST’
  STEP_NAME_LIST(STEP_NAME_CASE);
  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.c:187:3: error: expected expression before ‘case’
  (case STEP_##name: \
   ^~~~
./drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.h:37:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘STEP_NAME_CASE’
  func(J0)
  ^~~~
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.c:193:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘STEP_NAME_LIST’
  STEP_NAME_LIST(STEP_NAME_CASE);
  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
scripts/Makefile.build:271: recipe for target 'drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.o' failed
make[4]: *** [drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.o] Error 1
scripts/Makefile.build:514: recipe for target 'drivers/gpu/drm/i915' failed
make[3]: *** [drivers/gpu/drm/i915] Error 2
scripts/Makefile.build:514: recipe for target 'drivers/gpu/drm' failed
make[2]: *** [drivers/gpu/drm] Error 2
scripts/Makefile.build:514: recipe for target 'drivers/gpu' failed
make[1]: *** [drivers/gpu] Error 2
Makefile:1842: recipe for target 'drivers' failed
make: *** [drivers] Error 2


_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [Intel-gfx] [CI 1/2] drm/i915/step: Add macro magic for handling steps
  2021-07-19 21:38 [Intel-gfx] [CI 1/2] drm/i915/step: Add macro magic for handling steps Anusha Srivatsa
  2021-07-19 21:38 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 2/2] drm/i915/dmc: Change intel_get_stepping_info() Anusha Srivatsa
  2021-07-19 22:02 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for series starting with [CI,1/2] drm/i915/step: Add macro magic for handling steps Patchwork
@ 2021-08-12  9:59 ` Jani Nikula
  2021-08-12 16:05   ` Srivatsa, Anusha
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Jani Nikula @ 2021-08-12  9:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Anusha Srivatsa, intel-gfx; +Cc: Matt Roper, Lucas De Marchi

On Mon, 19 Jul 2021, Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com> wrote:
> With the addition of stepping info for
> all platforms, lets use macros for handling them
> and autogenerating code for all steps at a time.
>
> Suggested-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
> Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.c | 14 ++++++++++++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.h | 37 +++++++++++++++++++------------
>  2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.c
> index 9fcf17708cc8..d150d138e889 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.c
> @@ -182,3 +182,17 @@ void intel_step_init(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
>  
>  	RUNTIME_INFO(i915)->step = step;
>  }
> +
> +#define STEP_NAME_CASE(name)	\
> +	(case STEP_##name:	\
> +		return #name)
> +
> +const char *intel_step_name(enum intel_step step)
> +{
> +	switch (step) {
> +	STEP_NAME_LIST(STEP_NAME_CASE);
> +
> +	default:
> +		return "**";
> +	}
> +}
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.h
> index 88a77159703e..f6641e2a3c77 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.h
> @@ -15,30 +15,39 @@ struct intel_step_info {
>  	u8 display_step;
>  };
>  
> +#define STEP_ENUM_VAL(name)  STEP_##name,
> +
> +#define STEP_NAME_LIST(func)		\
> +	func(A0)			\
> +	func(A1)			\
> +	func(A2)			\
> +	func(B0)			\
> +	func(B1)			\
> +	func(B2)			\
> +	func(C0)			\
> +	func(C1)			\
> +	func(D0)			\
> +	func(D1)			\
> +	func(E0)			\
> +	func(F0)			\
> +	func(G0)			\
> +	func(H0)			\
> +	func(I0)			\
> +	func(I1)			\
> +	func(J0)
> +
>  /*
>   * Symbolic steppings that do not match the hardware. These are valid both as gt
>   * and display steppings as symbolic names.
>   */
>  enum intel_step {
>  	STEP_NONE = 0,
> -	STEP_A0,
> -	STEP_A2,
> -	STEP_B0,
> -	STEP_B1,
> -	STEP_C0,
> -	STEP_D0,
> -	STEP_D1,
> -	STEP_E0,
> -	STEP_F0,
> -	STEP_G0,
> -	STEP_H0,
> -	STEP_I0,
> -	STEP_I1,
> -	STEP_J0,
> +	STEP_NAME_LIST(STEP_ENUM_VAL)
>  	STEP_FUTURE,
>  	STEP_FOREVER,
>  };

It's been merged already, and so be it.

I'll just note that the main reason I don't like adding this kind of
macro abstractions is that it throws off source code tagging tools like
ctags and gnu global. I can no longer navigate the definition and all
the references of STEP_* using the tools, and it degenerates to git grep
which is much worse as it doesn't know about C syntax or semantics. It's
not always about how the code looks, it's also about how people can
navigate the code base.

BR,
Jani.


>  
>  void intel_step_init(struct drm_i915_private *i915);
> +const char *intel_step_name(enum intel_step step);
>  
>  #endif /* __INTEL_STEP_H__ */

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [Intel-gfx] [CI 1/2] drm/i915/step: Add macro magic for handling steps
  2021-08-12  9:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 1/2] " Jani Nikula
@ 2021-08-12 16:05   ` Srivatsa, Anusha
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Srivatsa, Anusha @ 2021-08-12 16:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jani Nikula, intel-gfx; +Cc: Roper, Matthew D, De Marchi, Lucas



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
> Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2021 2:59 AM
> To: Srivatsa, Anusha <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>; intel-
> gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Roper, Matthew D <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>; De Marchi, Lucas
> <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [CI 1/2] drm/i915/step: Add macro magic for handling
> steps
> 
> On Mon, 19 Jul 2021, Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com> wrote:
> > With the addition of stepping info for all platforms, lets use macros
> > for handling them and autogenerating code for all steps at a time.
> >
> > Suggested-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
> > Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.c | 14 ++++++++++++
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.h | 37 +++++++++++++++++++------------
> >  2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.c
> > index 9fcf17708cc8..d150d138e889 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.c
> > @@ -182,3 +182,17 @@ void intel_step_init(struct drm_i915_private
> > *i915)
> >
> >  	RUNTIME_INFO(i915)->step = step;
> >  }
> > +
> > +#define STEP_NAME_CASE(name)	\
> > +	(case STEP_##name:	\
> > +		return #name)
> > +
> > +const char *intel_step_name(enum intel_step step) {
> > +	switch (step) {
> > +	STEP_NAME_LIST(STEP_NAME_CASE);
> > +
> > +	default:
> > +		return "**";
> > +	}
> > +}
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.h
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.h
> > index 88a77159703e..f6641e2a3c77 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.h
> > @@ -15,30 +15,39 @@ struct intel_step_info {
> >  	u8 display_step;
> >  };
> >
> > +#define STEP_ENUM_VAL(name)  STEP_##name,
> > +
> > +#define STEP_NAME_LIST(func)		\
> > +	func(A0)			\
> > +	func(A1)			\
> > +	func(A2)			\
> > +	func(B0)			\
> > +	func(B1)			\
> > +	func(B2)			\
> > +	func(C0)			\
> > +	func(C1)			\
> > +	func(D0)			\
> > +	func(D1)			\
> > +	func(E0)			\
> > +	func(F0)			\
> > +	func(G0)			\
> > +	func(H0)			\
> > +	func(I0)			\
> > +	func(I1)			\
> > +	func(J0)
> > +
> >  /*
> >   * Symbolic steppings that do not match the hardware. These are valid
> both as gt
> >   * and display steppings as symbolic names.
> >   */
> >  enum intel_step {
> >  	STEP_NONE = 0,
> > -	STEP_A0,
> > -	STEP_A2,
> > -	STEP_B0,
> > -	STEP_B1,
> > -	STEP_C0,
> > -	STEP_D0,
> > -	STEP_D1,
> > -	STEP_E0,
> > -	STEP_F0,
> > -	STEP_G0,
> > -	STEP_H0,
> > -	STEP_I0,
> > -	STEP_I1,
> > -	STEP_J0,
> > +	STEP_NAME_LIST(STEP_ENUM_VAL)
> >  	STEP_FUTURE,
> >  	STEP_FOREVER,
> >  };
> 
> It's been merged already, and so be it.
> 
> I'll just note that the main reason I don't like adding this kind of macro
> abstractions is that it throws off source code tagging tools like ctags and gnu
> global. I can no longer navigate the definition and all the references of
> STEP_* using the tools, and it degenerates to git grep which is much worse as
> it doesn't know about C syntax or semantics. It's not always about how the
> code looks, it's also about how people can navigate the code base.

Had not considered that :-/ will keep this in mind from now on.
Thanks for the feedback.

Anusha
> BR,
> Jani.
> 
> 
> >
> >  void intel_step_init(struct drm_i915_private *i915);
> > +const char *intel_step_name(enum intel_step step);
> >
> >  #endif /* __INTEL_STEP_H__ */
> 
> --
> Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [Intel-gfx] [CI 2/2] drm/i915/dmc: Change intel_get_stepping_info()
  2021-07-19 22:13 Anusha Srivatsa
@ 2021-07-19 22:13 ` Anusha Srivatsa
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Anusha Srivatsa @ 2021-07-19 22:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: intel-gfx

Lets use RUNTIME_INFO->step since all platforms now have their
stepping info in intel_step.c. This makes intel_get_stepping_info()
a lot simpler.

Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c | 50 ++++--------------------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c
index f8789d4543bf..1f6c32932331 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c
@@ -247,50 +247,15 @@ bool intel_dmc_has_payload(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
 	return i915->dmc.dmc_info[DMC_FW_MAIN].payload;
 }
 
-static const struct stepping_info skl_stepping_info[] = {
-	{'A', '0'}, {'B', '0'}, {'C', '0'},
-	{'D', '0'}, {'E', '0'}, {'F', '0'},
-	{'G', '0'}, {'H', '0'}, {'I', '0'},
-	{'J', '0'}, {'K', '0'}
-};
-
-static const struct stepping_info bxt_stepping_info[] = {
-	{'A', '0'}, {'A', '1'}, {'A', '2'},
-	{'B', '0'}, {'B', '1'}, {'B', '2'}
-};
-
-static const struct stepping_info icl_stepping_info[] = {
-	{'A', '0'}, {'A', '1'}, {'A', '2'},
-	{'B', '0'}, {'B', '2'},
-	{'C', '0'}
-};
-
-static const struct stepping_info no_stepping_info = { '*', '*' };
-
 static const struct stepping_info *
-intel_get_stepping_info(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
+intel_get_stepping_info(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
+			struct stepping_info *si)
 {
-	const struct stepping_info *si;
-	unsigned int size;
-
-	if (IS_ICELAKE(dev_priv)) {
-		size = ARRAY_SIZE(icl_stepping_info);
-		si = icl_stepping_info;
-	} else if (IS_SKYLAKE(dev_priv)) {
-		size = ARRAY_SIZE(skl_stepping_info);
-		si = skl_stepping_info;
-	} else if (IS_BROXTON(dev_priv)) {
-		size = ARRAY_SIZE(bxt_stepping_info);
-		si = bxt_stepping_info;
-	} else {
-		size = 0;
-		si = NULL;
-	}
-
-	if (INTEL_REVID(dev_priv) < size)
-		return si + INTEL_REVID(dev_priv);
+	const char *step_name = intel_step_name(RUNTIME_INFO(i915)->step.display_step);
 
-	return &no_stepping_info;
+	si->stepping = step_name[0];
+	si->substepping = step_name[1];
+	return si;
 }
 
 static void gen9_set_dc_state_debugmask(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
@@ -616,7 +581,8 @@ static void parse_dmc_fw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
 	struct intel_package_header *package_header;
 	struct intel_dmc_header_base *dmc_header;
 	struct intel_dmc *dmc = &dev_priv->dmc;
-	const struct stepping_info *si = intel_get_stepping_info(dev_priv);
+	struct stepping_info display_info = { '*', '*'};
+	const struct stepping_info *si = intel_get_stepping_info(dev_priv, &display_info);
 	u32 readcount = 0;
 	u32 r, offset;
 	int id;
-- 
2.32.0

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [Intel-gfx] [CI 2/2] drm/i915/dmc: Change intel_get_stepping_info()
  2021-07-19 20:00 [Intel-gfx] [CI 1/2] drm/i915/step: Add macro magic for handling steps Anusha Srivatsa
@ 2021-07-19 20:00 ` Anusha Srivatsa
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Anusha Srivatsa @ 2021-07-19 20:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: intel-gfx

Lets use RUNTIME_INFO->step since all platforms now have their
stepping info in intel_step.c. This makes intel_get_stepping_info()
a lot simpler.

Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c | 50 ++++--------------------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c
index f8789d4543bf..1f6c32932331 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c
@@ -247,50 +247,15 @@ bool intel_dmc_has_payload(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
 	return i915->dmc.dmc_info[DMC_FW_MAIN].payload;
 }
 
-static const struct stepping_info skl_stepping_info[] = {
-	{'A', '0'}, {'B', '0'}, {'C', '0'},
-	{'D', '0'}, {'E', '0'}, {'F', '0'},
-	{'G', '0'}, {'H', '0'}, {'I', '0'},
-	{'J', '0'}, {'K', '0'}
-};
-
-static const struct stepping_info bxt_stepping_info[] = {
-	{'A', '0'}, {'A', '1'}, {'A', '2'},
-	{'B', '0'}, {'B', '1'}, {'B', '2'}
-};
-
-static const struct stepping_info icl_stepping_info[] = {
-	{'A', '0'}, {'A', '1'}, {'A', '2'},
-	{'B', '0'}, {'B', '2'},
-	{'C', '0'}
-};
-
-static const struct stepping_info no_stepping_info = { '*', '*' };
-
 static const struct stepping_info *
-intel_get_stepping_info(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
+intel_get_stepping_info(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
+			struct stepping_info *si)
 {
-	const struct stepping_info *si;
-	unsigned int size;
-
-	if (IS_ICELAKE(dev_priv)) {
-		size = ARRAY_SIZE(icl_stepping_info);
-		si = icl_stepping_info;
-	} else if (IS_SKYLAKE(dev_priv)) {
-		size = ARRAY_SIZE(skl_stepping_info);
-		si = skl_stepping_info;
-	} else if (IS_BROXTON(dev_priv)) {
-		size = ARRAY_SIZE(bxt_stepping_info);
-		si = bxt_stepping_info;
-	} else {
-		size = 0;
-		si = NULL;
-	}
-
-	if (INTEL_REVID(dev_priv) < size)
-		return si + INTEL_REVID(dev_priv);
+	const char *step_name = intel_step_name(RUNTIME_INFO(i915)->step.display_step);
 
-	return &no_stepping_info;
+	si->stepping = step_name[0];
+	si->substepping = step_name[1];
+	return si;
 }
 
 static void gen9_set_dc_state_debugmask(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
@@ -616,7 +581,8 @@ static void parse_dmc_fw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
 	struct intel_package_header *package_header;
 	struct intel_dmc_header_base *dmc_header;
 	struct intel_dmc *dmc = &dev_priv->dmc;
-	const struct stepping_info *si = intel_get_stepping_info(dev_priv);
+	struct stepping_info display_info = { '*', '*'};
+	const struct stepping_info *si = intel_get_stepping_info(dev_priv, &display_info);
 	u32 readcount = 0;
 	u32 r, offset;
 	int id;
-- 
2.32.0

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2021-08-12 16:10 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-07-19 21:38 [Intel-gfx] [CI 1/2] drm/i915/step: Add macro magic for handling steps Anusha Srivatsa
2021-07-19 21:38 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 2/2] drm/i915/dmc: Change intel_get_stepping_info() Anusha Srivatsa
2021-07-19 22:02 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for series starting with [CI,1/2] drm/i915/step: Add macro magic for handling steps Patchwork
2021-08-12  9:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 1/2] " Jani Nikula
2021-08-12 16:05   ` Srivatsa, Anusha
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-07-19 22:13 Anusha Srivatsa
2021-07-19 22:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 2/2] drm/i915/dmc: Change intel_get_stepping_info() Anusha Srivatsa
2021-07-19 20:00 [Intel-gfx] [CI 1/2] drm/i915/step: Add macro magic for handling steps Anusha Srivatsa
2021-07-19 20:00 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 2/2] drm/i915/dmc: Change intel_get_stepping_info() Anusha Srivatsa

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.