All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
	"Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
	Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	x86@kernel.org
Subject: [patch 3/8] PCI/MSI: Enforce that MSI-X table entry is masked for update
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2021 21:11:29 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210721192650.408910288@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210721191126.274946280@linutronix.de>

The specification states:

    For MSI-X, a function is permitted to cache Address and Data values
    from unmasked MSI-X Table entries. However, anytime software unmasks a
    currently masked MSI-X Table entry either by clearing its Mask bit or
    by clearing the Function Mask bit, the function must update any Address
    or Data values that it cached from that entry. If software changes the
    Address or Data value of an entry while the entry is unmasked, the
    result is undefined.

The Linux kernel's MSI-X support never enforced that the entry is masked
before the entry is modified hence the Fixes tag refers to a commit in:
      git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tglx/history.git

Enforce the entry to be masked across the update.

There is no point in enforcing this to be handled at all possible call
sites as this is just pointless code duplication and the common update
function is the obvious place to enforce this.

Reported-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
Fixes: f036d4ea5fa7 ("[PATCH] ia32 Message Signalled Interrupt support")
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
---
 drivers/pci/msi.c |   15 +++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)

--- a/drivers/pci/msi.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/msi.c
@@ -289,13 +289,28 @@ void __pci_write_msi_msg(struct msi_desc
 		/* Don't touch the hardware now */
 	} else if (entry->msi_attrib.is_msix) {
 		void __iomem *base = pci_msix_desc_addr(entry);
+		bool unmasked = !(entry->masked & PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_CTRL_MASKBIT);
 
 		if (!base)
 			goto skip;
 
+		/*
+		 * The specification mandates that the entry is masked
+		 * when the message is modified:
+		 *
+		 * "If software changes the Address or Data value of an
+		 * entry while the entry is unmasked, the result is
+		 * undefined."
+		 */
+		if (unmasked)
+			__pci_msix_desc_mask_irq(entry, PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_CTRL_MASKBIT);
+
 		writel(msg->address_lo, base + PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_LOWER_ADDR);
 		writel(msg->address_hi, base + PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_UPPER_ADDR);
 		writel(msg->data, base + PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_DATA);
+
+		if (unmasked)
+			__pci_msix_desc_mask_irq(entry, 0);
 	} else {
 		int pos = dev->msi_cap;
 		u16 msgctl;


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-07-21 19:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-21 19:11 [patch 0/8] PCI/MSI, x86: Cure a couple of inconsistencies Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-21 19:11 ` [patch 1/8] PCI/MSI: Enable and mask MSIX early Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-21 21:38   ` Raj, Ashok
2021-07-21 22:51     ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-22 21:43   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-07-27 20:33     ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-21 19:11 ` [patch 2/8] PCI/MSI: Mask all unused MSI-X entries Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-21 22:23   ` Raj, Ashok
2021-07-21 22:57     ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-22 13:46       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-28 10:04         ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-22 21:45   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-07-21 19:11 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2021-07-21 22:32   ` [patch 3/8] PCI/MSI: Enforce that MSI-X table entry is masked for update Raj, Ashok
2021-07-21 22:59     ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-22 21:46   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-07-21 19:11 ` [patch 4/8] PCI/MSI: Enforce MSI[X] entry updates to be visible Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-22 21:48   ` Bjorn Helgaas
     [not found]     ` <CAHp75VdNi4rMuRz8UrW9Haf_Ge8KmNJ0w9ykheqkVhmpXHTUyg@mail.gmail.com>
2021-07-23  8:14       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-21 19:11 ` [patch 5/8] PCI/MSI: Simplify msi_verify_entries() Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-21 19:11 ` [patch 6/8] genirq: Provide IRQCHIP_AFFINITY_PRE_STARTUP Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-22 15:12   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-28 10:40     ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-21 19:11 ` [patch 7/8] x86/ioapic: Force affinity setup before startup Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-21 19:11 ` [patch 8/8] x86/msi: " Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-21 21:10 ` [patch 0/8] PCI/MSI, x86: Cure a couple of inconsistencies Raj, Ashok
2021-07-21 22:39   ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-22 15:17 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-22 21:43 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-07-27 20:38   ` Thomas Gleixner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210721192650.408910288@linutronix.de \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --subject='Re: [patch 3/8] PCI/MSI: Enforce that MSI-X table entry is masked for update' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.